Perhaps, just for a few moments, you could stop weaseling and equivocating and specify which shade of meaning of “inclined” you are advancing. This was already noted upthread. Maybe you responded, but I have mostly stopped reading your bullshit because it is as boring and predictable as it is nonsensical.
️ Here's the response you didn't read. ️
Your conclusion does not follow from your premises. First, stupid people can make correct conclusions. Second, both stupidity and immorality exist on along a continuum. For example a cannibal might agree that the Crusades were bad, etcc… but still eat freshky killed human flesh.
Of course I read it. You are still equivocating on which shade of meaning you are using of the word inclined. If you mean most people are inclined not to WANT to make mistakes, be stupid, deluded, etc., I think that’s true. But the sense of the word “inclined” implied in the OP is “being prone to,” as, “prone to committing errors” regardless of whether they want to or not. Make up your mind what you mean and stop blaming others for your slippery equivocations and evasiveness, such as not yet giving a straight answer to question whether God is to blame for brain cancer in children, and if not, why not? Your prior insinuations that parental misbehavior somehow causes such cancer is of course laughably stupid, so try not to repeat it please.
No, of course not. They are one of the mechanisms by which religions achieve their actual goal: Making the leaders of religions wealthy and powerful.
Yeah, it teaches the opposite. But it doesn't seem to have learned the opposite. It certainly doesn't do the opposite.
No, the goal is to gain power and wealth for religious leaders.
Having powerful leaders is indeed an evolutionary benefit for tribal societies.
iidb.org
How about I modify your list a bit.
I don't know what planet you are living on, but in the reality I can readily observe, plenty of people are inclined to approve of those things.
Did you read anything else in my post?
