Shadowy Man
Contributor
Remember, Trump only hires the best lawyers. The best lawyers know to not waste time getting prepared until you absolutely know what to prepare for.
-
Features
Moved Live Trump Trial Updates
- Thread starter Jimmy Higgins
- Start date
To denote the thread has been moved
TomC
Bless Your Heart!
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Messages
- 9,326
- Location
- Midwestern USA
- Gender
- Faggot
- Basic Beliefs
- Agnostic deist
Imagine how much hush money she's collecting.
Tom
TomC
Bless Your Heart!
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Messages
- 9,326
- Location
- Midwestern USA
- Gender
- Faggot
- Basic Beliefs
- Agnostic deist
My vague recollection is that she was married to her 4th ex husband at the time that song was topping the charts.
Tom
Colonel Sanders
Senior Member
TomC
Bless Your Heart!
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Messages
- 9,326
- Location
- Midwestern USA
- Gender
- Faggot
- Basic Beliefs
- Agnostic deist
Know of any really good Melania Trump figures from comedy shows like Saturday Night Live?
The stuff writes itself.
Remember Tina Fey doing Sarah Palin?
Tom
Ford
Contributor
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2010
- Messages
- 7,253
- Location
- Freedomland
- Basic Beliefs
- Just don't knock on my door on a Saturday Morning
My guess is that she's sitting down with her (probably much better) attorneys and going over the prenup with a fine-toothed comb AGAIN.
ideologyhunter
Contributor
I think she's making the bellboys happy at Drumpf Tower.
Colonel Sanders
Senior Member
I haven't watched SNL in years, but I'm sure they could have someone portray her or have a guest on to do it.
Ford
Contributor
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2010
- Messages
- 7,253
- Location
- Freedomland
- Basic Beliefs
- Just don't knock on my door on a Saturday Morning
I haven't watched the show in years, either, but do enjoy some clips on the YouTube. Weekend Update is pretty damned funny, but they don't seem to have found someone to parody Melania yet. At least not well.
Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 44,388
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
I like the idea of Melania and Barron getting everything via the pre-nup and the hilarity that ensues with the rest of the rats.
Fighting, scheming, Game of Thrones style only to find out all that is left is ownership of a Knights Inn in Newark, NJ.
TomC
Bless Your Heart!
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Messages
- 9,326
- Location
- Midwestern USA
- Gender
- Faggot
- Basic Beliefs
- Agnostic deist
If Stormy Daniels did Melania and Barron Trump, live on pay-per-view, even I would watch.
I don't go for that sort of thing, but I don't have very clear standards.
Tom
TomC
Bless Your Heart!
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Messages
- 9,326
- Location
- Midwestern USA
- Gender
- Faggot
- Basic Beliefs
- Agnostic deist
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 39,144
- Location
- Frozen in Michigan
- Gender
- Old Fart
- Basic Beliefs
- Don't be a dick.
Colonel Sanders
Senior Member
Schitt's Creek: The Trump Years.
Derec
Contributor
I thought she stood by the JAMs ...
Imagine the outrage if people were making fun of the appearance of a female Dem's vagina or vulva ...
ideologyhunter
Contributor
I thought she stood by the JAMs ...
Imagine the outrage if people were making fun of the appearance of a female Dem's vagina or vulva ...
Oh, please. The Right went into ecstasies of sarcastic humor when Paula Jones claimed she knew "distinguishing characteristics" of Clinton's cock. Limbaugh did bits about it. You think if Hillary were somehow vulnerable to this sort of speculation, that there'd have been any pullback from Righties?
Trump made this a public topic when he referred unmistakeably to his own supposed girth and might on a primary debate stage. So, find a double standard if you want.
Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 44,388
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
I thought she stood by the JAMs ...
Imagine the outrage if people were making fun of the appearance of a female Dem's vagina or vulva ...
Trump can always take the oath and testify about it.
Elixir
Made in America
I thought she stood by the JAMs ...
Imagine the outrage if people were making fun of the appearance of a female Dem's vagina or vulva ...
So cute when Derec gets all butthurt about people making fun of his orange avatar …
Swammerdami
Squadron Leader
Is there a thread to complain about the content and organization of the post-rational World Wide Web? I have many such complaints! 
Especially annoying are click-bait stories. Maybe most of you are too smart to fall for such crap, but I'm a sucker for sentimental stories, even when I know they're fiction. A simple story that can be completed in 3 paragraphs drags out over literally 30 or 40 clicks or even more! Each click brings you another sentence or two of the story. (The clicks bring ads of course. I'd like to see a movement to list the advertisers and have millions of us agree NEVER to buy anything from those advertisers!)
But I'm posting about Transcripts for the trial New York vs Trump. It took me several clicks just to find a link, but once I found nycourts.gov or WTF it was, my problems had only just begun.
First I had to "prove I was not a robot." That's fair, perhaps -- they may need to prevent Trumplickers from organizing a Denial of Service attack. But after proving (TWICE) that I was a non-robot, I was finally presented with a tiny pdf file with one (1) tiny page. Click 'Next' to get another tiny page. No idea how many teeny-tiny transcript pages it takes per day; these teeny-tiny pdfs were useless for me. Is nycourts.gov unaware that more than one page can be bundled into a single pdf file?
I gave up. But after a few minutes, I selected that Tab again to see if they even had URLs I could download en masse via script. But guess what? I was asked yet a THIRD time to "prove that I was not a robot."
Has some news organization whose web designers have 100+ IQs, if any, bundled these transcripts into files that are not useless?
Especially annoying are click-bait stories. Maybe most of you are too smart to fall for such crap, but I'm a sucker for sentimental stories, even when I know they're fiction. A simple story that can be completed in 3 paragraphs drags out over literally 30 or 40 clicks or even more! Each click brings you another sentence or two of the story. (The clicks bring ads of course. I'd like to see a movement to list the advertisers and have millions of us agree NEVER to buy anything from those advertisers!)
But I'm posting about Transcripts for the trial New York vs Trump. It took me several clicks just to find a link, but once I found nycourts.gov or WTF it was, my problems had only just begun.
First I had to "prove I was not a robot." That's fair, perhaps -- they may need to prevent Trumplickers from organizing a Denial of Service attack. But after proving (TWICE) that I was a non-robot, I was finally presented with a tiny pdf file with one (1) tiny page. Click 'Next' to get another tiny page. No idea how many teeny-tiny transcript pages it takes per day; these teeny-tiny pdfs were useless for me. Is nycourts.gov unaware that more than one page can be bundled into a single pdf file?
I gave up. But after a few minutes, I selected that Tab again to see if they even had URLs I could download en masse via script. But guess what? I was asked yet a THIRD time to "prove that I was not a robot."
Has some news organization whose web designers have 100+ IQs, if any, bundled these transcripts into files that are not useless?