• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

The NC Pee-pee Law: And the stupid continues.

AthenaAwakened

Contributor
Joined
Sep 17, 2003
Messages
5,369
Location
Right behind you so ... BOO!
Basic Beliefs
non-theist, anarcho-socialist
NORTH CAROLINA: WOMAN KICKED OUT OF LADIES’ BATHROOM BY POLICE AFTER BEING MISTAKEN FOR TRANSGENDER

Linda Hovensky, a 54-year-old resident of Charlotte, was tased multiple times by police officers as she was forced outside of the ladies washroom with her pants down and in front of a large crowd.

“I was taking a crap when police officers started yelling at me and telling me to open the door but I wasn’t finished, so they kicked the door open and grabbed me with my pants down and rushed me outside” recalls the victim, visibly traumatized by the latest events.

The woman represented a visible threat to police officers on the scene, explains Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department spokesman, Allan Jones.

“If the lady had not refused to come out peacefully of the washroom and explain calmly that she was in fact in her rights to be there, there would not have been an escalation of violence. The woman threatened police officers and that is what made things difficult for her and the agents that intervened” said Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department spokesman, Allan Jones, in a press conference. “She was hysterical and represented a possible threat to our officers who followed all proper procedures in this case,” he adds.

She was sitting on the toilet doing what people do when sitting on the toilet. Having the police interrupt defecation in its proper location could well be a tad upsetting.
 
Well if she was hysterical, that proves she has a uterus and is therefore not transgendered.

Checkmate, officers.
 
JUST IN,
It is a hoax.
For now, I suspect it's only a matter of time, though.

Someone will find a fellow citizen too mannish, or not mannish enough, cops will be called, people will insist on not giving a shit about the policeman's demands until they're through giving a shit, someone will say 'he was wearing a hoodie when he went in there' and the shit'll hit the fan...
 
JUST IN,
It is a hoax.
For now, I suspect it's only a matter of time, though.

Someone will find a fellow citizen too mannish, or not mannish enough, cops will be called, people will insist on not giving a shit about the policeman's demands until they're through giving a shit, someone will say 'he was wearing a hoodie when he went in there' and the shit'll hit the fan...
Yep. And they will ask for a genital check, etc.
 
So how long until a pervy guy goes into the ladies room, claiming he was born a woman?
 
So how long until a pervy guy goes into the ladies room, claiming he was born a woman?

I'm worried this comment might be offensive to those who identify as pervy and perv-curious.
 
So how long until a pervy guy goes into the ladies room, claiming he was born a woman?
That was happening long before anyone passed laws either way:

Man Disguised as Woman Recorded "Hours" of Mall Restroom

Police: Man in bra and wig found in women's bathroom

Cross-dressing man arrested for exposure at Walmart

These are all straight men who dressed as women for the purposes of committing crimes. We did not need bathroom laws against these types as they were all arrested for their actual crimes.

And there is this guy :rolleyes:
Mike Huckabee: I wish I could have claimed to be transgender to 'shower with the girls' in high school
 
And then you have those of us who think that the toilet options should be 'cares' and 'doesn't care' with two stalls with solid locking doors and a sink, and then a very large bathroom with a few urinals behind a partition and lots and lots of stalls. The people with some reason to care about enhanced privacy for whatever medical, psychological, or religious reason get that, and everyone else gets to have enough stalls and urinals and no judgement for being where they are or are not.
 
And then you have those of us who think that the toilet options should be 'cares' and 'doesn't care' with two stalls with solid locking doors and a sink, and then a very large bathroom with a few urinals behind a partition and lots and lots of stalls. The people with some reason to care about enhanced privacy for whatever medical, psychological, or religious reason get that, and everyone else gets to have enough stalls and urinals and no judgement for being where they are or are not.

^^^ That is what I think, too, and some offices have already done that.
 
We had somebody stop by and tell us our backstage event (mens) restroom was gender neutral. Our reply: "Been that way for years."
 
JUST IN,

It is a hoax.

Sorry for mix up

Please procede with your day.

The World News Daily Report specializes in the entirely too credible satire.

A few years ago, they published a story about body parts being found floating in a river in Ohio. The story seemed very matter of factual, except for a small part about paramedics administering CPR to a headless torso for two hours, because of a state law requiring them to treat drowning victims until declared dead by the coroner.

Someone new the supposed site shared the story on facebook, which set off a panic in the city, for fear of a serial ax murder on the loose.
 
Having two facilities where one would suffice seems pretty pointless to me. It's a throwback to Puritanism, and has no basis outside religious foolishness.

Indeed in parts of Europe, where Puritanism was never very influential, public toilet facilities have always been gender neutral; in Brussels, it's common to have one facility with a row of stalls and a urinal. Nobody dies. The sky steadfastly remains in place. The planet continues to rotate.

It's one of those things that is so pervasive that we never stop to think just how batshit insane it actually is, to build two almost identical sets of facilities, when one would be more than adequate to meet the human need to eliminate bodily wastes.

The very existence of gender segregated bathrooms stems from moral panic on the part of religious loons.
 
So who is this law for, disappointed up-skirt photo shooters?

The pee-pee part of the law is a ruse to get the other parts of the law passed such as:

The new law did more than repeal the Charlotte ordinance. It made the state’s law on antidiscrimination — which covers race, religion, national origin, color, age, biological sex and handicaps — the final word. Meaning cities and local governments can’t expand “employment” or “public accommodations” protections to others, such as on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Minimum wage also falls under the state’s antidiscrimination law, so this law means local governments aren’t able to set their own minimum wages beyond the state standard.
https://www.yahoo.com/katiecouric/the-north-carolina-bathroom-bill-hb2-explained-172020141.html
 
So how long until a pervy guy goes into the ladies room, claiming he was born a woman?
That was happening long before anyone passed laws either way:

Man Disguised as Woman Recorded "Hours" of Mall Restroom

Police: Man in bra and wig found in women's bathroom

Cross-dressing man arrested for exposure at Walmart

These are all straight men who dressed as women for the purposes of committing crimes. We did not need bathroom laws against these types as they were all arrested for their actual crimes.

And there is this guy :rolleyes:
Mike Huckabee: I wish I could have claimed to be transgender to 'shower with the girls' in high school

So, those cases prove the point that there are plenty of voyeuristic male perverts so motivated that they will risk breaking the law to enter a designated women's bathroom. That guarantees that such perversion motivated actions will notably increase in frequency if it is impossible to prosecute them (or even illegal to ask them to leave), due to laws that allow any person to simply declare their gender. In fact, it is plausible if not likely, that such men entering "women's" room for some sexual thrill will be more common in some areas than men who do so out of sincere female gender identification.

One might think that those who pretend to care about women being victims of sex crimes might care about that, rather then denying this reality because they cannot pragmatically reconcile it with their desire to be the banner waver for the cause of transgender politics.
 
That was happening long before anyone passed laws either way:

Man Disguised as Woman Recorded "Hours" of Mall Restroom

Police: Man in bra and wig found in women's bathroom

Cross-dressing man arrested for exposure at Walmart

These are all straight men who dressed as women for the purposes of committing crimes. We did not need bathroom laws against these types as they were all arrested for their actual crimes.

And there is this guy :rolleyes:
Mike Huckabee: I wish I could have claimed to be transgender to 'shower with the girls' in high school

So, those cases prove the point that there are plenty of voyeuristic male perverts so motivated that they will risk breaking the law to enter a designated women's bathroom. That guarantees that such perversion motivated actions will notably increase in frequency if it is impossible to prosecute them (or even illegal to ask them to leave), due to laws that allow any person to simply declare their gender. In fact, it is plausible if not likely, that such men entering "women's" room for some sexual thrill will be more common in some areas than men who do so out of sincere female gender identification.

One might think that those who pretend to care about women being victims of sex crimes might care about that, rather then denying this reality because they cannot pragmatically reconcile it with their desire to be the banner waver for the cause of transgender politics.

No. What the cases prove is that the law had no trouble arresting them for their actual crimes before. They weren't arrested for dressing up like women, nor for being in the women's bathroom. They were arrested for voyeurism, indecent exposure, etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom