Toni
Contributor
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 22,720
- Basic Beliefs
- Peace on Earth, goodwill towards all
The myth is that cultural appropriation qua cultural appropriation is automatically bad. As long as this central idea is allowed to go unchallenged, the mythicists will continue their never ending quest to be as selfish, entitled little pricklets as possible.
So, any idea that you disagree with is now a 'myth?'
Do you know what a myth is?
If I put on a bonnet of feathers, sell sweat lodge ceremonies, chant Lakota prayers over my white consumers paying me for this, to the outrage of the Lakota people, that’s cultural appropriation. It doesn’t matter if it’s religious, it’s still an important part of a people’s identity and disrespecting it is taking a big ugly shit on human beings which doesn't jibe well with a rational stance of "live and let live".
But "live and let live" is a rational stance -- and if people want to pay other people to orchestrate a really bad experience in a sweat lodge, so what? I simply cannot process why people privilege the distress of some people over the feelings of others who are non-violently engaging in an activity.
In your statement above, you state:
There's a saying: give 'em an inch and they'll take a mile. Well, it's already too late for that. The cultural appropriation mythicists have taken that inch and run a marathon. When somebody can publish such moral dreck as the author in the OP, can be paid for espousing such highfalutin, bombastic, but ultimately empty rantings, and when ordinarily sane people find the need to defend her (#notallmythicists), I despair.
You seem to have no problem with the person in abaddon's example making a profit over providing a false and deceptive version of a Lakota practice to the public for profit.
However, you are outraged that someone publishes an article that you disagree with about such practices and resort to rants and name calling.
Huh.