Breitbart: rape now means "any sex that the woman ends up regretting"

[Underseer]

https://www.mediamatters.org/video/...-any-sex-woman-ends-regretting-she-had/218618

Before you ask, yes. Date rape still counts as rape. If you were a decent person, you would not need this explained to you.

 

[RavenSky]

1. There are a few here who say the same thing
2. Is it any surprise that Breitbart is filled with rapey rapers who rape?

 

[Bronzeage]

I guess that puts Steve Bannon's mother on the list.

 

[Underseer]

1. There are a few here who say the same thing
2. Is it any surprise that Breitbart is filled with rapey rapers who rape?

Not at all. I'm just hoping people will remember this the next time conservatives go on a "Boy, them thar Mosslems shore hate wimmen! Them thar Mooslems are bad because they is all mean ta wimmenz!" tirade. Funny how treating women badly is only bad when other people are doing it.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

When you look at the definition some feminists use that's what it amounts to.

However, that's not mainstream opinion.

 

[Ford]

but you guys can do this in your own mind, where rape used to mean something. We used to all knew what it meant. And then now we don't know what it means.

And this gets to the heart of the matter. The real problem with rape is that if you're a guy thinking about whether or not you should have sex with that passed out sorority girl or unconscious co-worker after the holiday party, you might have to consider for a nano second whether or not she's actually up for it...and that's an undue burden on you.

It is so unfair when a woman gets to the point where she's unable to consent to having sex with you, and after the fact she says she was unable to consent to having sex with you and the next thing you know you're unjustly charged with "rape." I mean...come on!

It is awfully difficult to be a man nowadays. Having to figure out whether a woman wants to have sex with you when she's incapacitated. Jesus...what are we supposed to do?

 

[fromderinside]

Find a private corner and jack off without going over and shooting the passed out lady with your cum.

Too hard?

 

[coloradoatheist]

but you guys can do this in your own mind, where rape used to mean something. We used to all knew what it meant. And then now we don't know what it means.

And this gets to the heart of the matter. The real problem with rape is that if you're a guy thinking about whether or not you should have sex with that passed out sorority girl or unconscious co-worker after the holiday party, you might have to consider for a nano second whether or not she's actually up for it...and that's an undue burden on you.

It is so unfair when a woman gets to the point where she's unable to consent to having sex with you, and after the fact she says she was unable to consent to having sex with you and the next thing you know you're unjustly charged with "rape." I mean...come on!

It is awfully difficult to be a man nowadays. Having to figure out whether a woman wants to have sex with you when she's incapacitated. Jesus...what are we supposed to do?

It depends Ford. Do you want 100% surety that a guy won't be charged with rape? And there is no way to do that, even marriage. So abstinence is the only way for that. Any time a guy sleeps with a woman he could be charged with rape.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

Do you want 100% surety that a guy won't be charged with rape? ... So abstinence is the only way for that.

You could get charged with rape even if abstinent. Therefore, there is no 100% surety.

Moreover, your advocacy of abstinence is a known failure as a policy. The advocacy of abstinence does not lead to real abstinence.

 

[RavenSky]

When you look at the definition some feminists use that's what it amounts to.

bullshit

 

[Angry Floof]

I guess that puts Steve Bannon's mother on the list.

BAM!

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

When you look at the definition some feminists use that's what it amounts to.

And some men love violating unconscious women due to a sense of entitlement.

- - - Updated - - -

Do you want 100% surety that a guy won't be charged with rape? ... So abstinence is the only way for that.

You could get charged with rape even if abstinent. Therefore, there is no 100% surety.

Yeah, even if you tear your thing off, they can claim you used an object. Women are so evil! Even chopping your member off isn't enough for those radical feminazists!

Moreover, your advocacy of abstinence is a known failure as a policy. The advocacy of abstinence does not lead to real abstinence.

It seems like the best course of action is to kill all humans. Bender had it right the whole time.

 

[Bronzeage]

but you guys can do this in your own mind, where rape used to mean something. We used to all knew what it meant. And then now we don't know what it means.

And this gets to the heart of the matter. The real problem with rape is that if you're a guy thinking about whether or not you should have sex with that passed out sorority girl or unconscious co-worker after the holiday party, you might have to consider for a nano second whether or not she's actually up for it...and that's an undue burden on you.

It is so unfair when a woman gets to the point where she's unable to consent to having sex with you, and after the fact she says she was unable to consent to having sex with you and the next thing you know you're unjustly charged with "rape." I mean...come on!

It is awfully difficult to be a man nowadays. Having to figure out whether a woman wants to have sex with you when she's incapacitated. Jesus...what are we supposed to do?

It depends Ford. Do you want 100% surety that a guy won't be charged with rape? And there is no way to do that, even marriage. So abstinence is the only way for that. Any time a guy sleeps with a woman he could be charged with rape.

I've never been worried. It's actually quite a bit of work to risk a rape accusation, while it's quite easy to avoid the problem, but still get plenty of sex. Having sex with an uncooperative woman is difficult. It's not so easy with an unconscious one. If a man prefers either, that's a fetish, and will eventually lead to a lot of trouble.

My standard advice to young men who feel they aren't getting the kind of affection they think they merit, has always been, "Clean shirt, clean fingernails, smell good, and smile." That will get you in the door, and maybe into bed. Leave anything off the list and you don't have shot.

If one wants to avoid being slapped with an erroneous rape charge, it's really simple. Only have sex with women you know and trust. If you don't know any women, or don't trust any, your way may be best.

 

[RavenSky]

If one wants to avoid being slapped with an erroneous rape charge, it's really simple. Only have sex with women you know and trust. If you don't know any women, or don't trust any, your way may be best.

It really is this simple.

 

[Derec]

And some men love violating unconscious women due to a sense of entitlement.

Violating unconscious women would be sexual assault or rape, depending on circumstances. But lately many innocent guys have been expelled from colleges for consensual drunken hookups where both parties were drunk, but fully conscious.

If she is not able to consent for being drunk, why is the same standard not applied to the drunk guy, leading to expulsion of both?

 

[RVonse]

When you look at the definition some feminists use that's what it amounts to.

However, that's not mainstream opinion.

Not yet.

 

[RVonse]

When you look at the definition some feminists use that's what it amounts to.

However, that's not mainstream opinion.

Not yet.

If the feminists have their way this will become the mainstream opinion. When that happens, a lot of rational men are not going to have sex with women for obvious reasons. And it will be interesting to see if natures sex drive is still stronger than basic fear of staying out of jail. Is fear of going to jail more or less than the desire of sex with a woman? Whatever the outcome, it is fair to say there will be a further decline of family values and propensity for population to further decline.

From a purely scientific perspective of climate warming, a decline in population is a good thing for the world. We will be able to thank feminists for this.

But it will be population control only in the advanced societies because the un-advanced societies without US style feminism will still have plenty of people being born. In the end, there may still be the same amount of population, it will simply be different societies populating the earth.

 

[laughing dog]

Why did Rosa Parks do what she did? Or MLK? Or MAD (mad woman against drunks)? They probably did what they did for their own satisfaction of personal integrity and were willing to take the heat. But admittedly I am just speculating about this.

Rosa Parks and MLK were protesting against obvious and transparent LAWS and practices that they rightly considered unjust that directly affected their everyday lives and the every day lives of millions of other people. MADD is Mothers Against Drunk Driving which fought against the laisser-faire attitude towards drunk driving.

Comparing someone who whines against what he perceives as poor judgment in instances where he does not know all of the facts for any reason with those Rosa Parks and MLK who put their lives in danger to fight for what they felt was right and just seems more than a bit of a stretch.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

I've never been worried. It's actually quite a bit of work to risk a rape accusation, while it's quite easy to avoid the problem, but still get plenty of sex. Having sex with an uncooperative woman is difficult. It's not so easy with an unconscious one. If a man prefers either, that's a fetish, and will eventually lead to a lot of trouble.

My standard advice to young men who feel they aren't getting the kind of affection they think they merit, has always been, "Clean shirt, clean fingernails, smell good, and smile." That will get you in the door, and maybe into bed. Leave anything off the list and you don't have shot.

If one wants to avoid being slapped with an erroneous rape charge, it's really simple. Only have sex with women you know and trust. If you don't know any women, or don't trust any, your way may be best.

Yeah, the trust bit--which obviously does not apply to the common young adult pattern of hooking up.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

If that is really the case, the same thing probably occurred with Harvey Wienstein too. Perhaps even Bill Clinton too. They just couldn't get women into bed the standard way so they used their extreme positions of power to get the job done. They had bad judgement because they were angry with women. So if this is really true with Derec he would be in good company, that's for sure.

I disagree about Clinton. While he was a womanizer the allegations of harassment appear to have been political in nature.