• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Ann Coulter: women shouldn't be cops

Underseer

Contributor
Joined
May 29, 2003
Messages
11,413
Location
Chicago suburbs
Basic Beliefs
atheism, resistentialism
Dmna0MiUUAAS-BA.jpg

Another example of why there shouldn't be girl cops. Lacking the strength of a man, girls go straight for fatal force.

According to conservative/libertarian arguments, the above statement can't possibly be misogynist because Ann Coulter is a woman herself.

As with most bigoted statement, she can't even get her facts straight. There is currently an epidemic of police of both genders and all races murdering citizens and getting away with it. This is not at all limited to women, nor has she produced the necessary empirical evidence to say that it is more likely to happen with female cops than with male cops, but it pushes the conservolibertarian narrative that women are inherently less than men, so most of her fan base won't be bothered by any of those relevant facts.
 
Its Ann Coulter. She's obviously trying to get some of her notoriety back. She lost it to Milo and then to Trump. But she is a woman (sort of), so focus your ire on her and not them, or you are sexist. Or something like that.
 
Bill Maher once claimed that Ann Coulter is actually decent in person off camera, and that what you see her doing here and elsewhere in her books, etc, is playing a character because she knows it will sell. She basically harnessed the left wing outrage machine. Now she's trying to do that again. I wouldn't be too surprised if this was true.
 
I'd liken Ann Coulter to Serena Joy, except that even Serena Joy has flashes of humanity left in her

Don't you know that criticizing a conservative or libertarian is the same thing as taking away their free speech rights? How dare you?
 
Bill Maher once claimed that Ann Coulter is actually decent in person off camera, and that what you see her doing here and elsewhere in her books, etc, is playing a character because she knows it will sell. She basically harnessed the left wing outrage machine. Now she's trying to do that again. I wouldn't be too surprised if this was true.

I don't care if she's pretending or not.

What if Hitler was actually a decent person and just said and did all those horrible things because he was playing a character? It wouldn't matter because either way he had a very negative effect on the world. He did so much harm that intent is really irrelevant.
 
Bill Maher once claimed that Ann Coulter is actually decent in person off camera, and that what you see her doing here and elsewhere in her books, etc, is playing a character because she knows it will sell. She basically harnessed the left wing outrage machine. Now she's trying to do that again. I wouldn't be too surprised if this was true.

I don't care if she's pretending or not.

What if Hitler was actually a decent person and just said and did all those horrible things because he was playing a character? It wouldn't matter because either way he had a very negative effect on the world. He did so much harm that intent is really irrelevant.

First we have the Moore-Coulter, now we have the Coulter-Hitler.

Hitler did more than say mean and provocative things.
 
Another example of why there shouldn't be girl cops. Lacking the strength of a man, girls go straight for fatal force.

According to conservative/libertarianblack-people-can't-be-racist arguments, the above statement can't possibly be misogynist because Ann Coulter is a woman herself.
FIFY.

Where on earth do you fantasize that you've seen conservatives and/or libertarians arguing that women can't be sexist?
 
1 Timothy 2:12 - But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

Shut up Ann.

You know who else shouldn't be cops? Bunnies!

zootopia.jpg
 
Ann Coulter has always been and always be just a hair-do. She only says shit like that to get attention. She should go live in Gilead and be a Handmaid wearing red.
 
Yup, and by reacting to it, we are just feeding her and encouraging her to do more of it. If it didn't pay, she wouldn't do it.
 
Bill Maher once claimed that Ann Coulter is actually decent in person off camera, and that what you see her doing here and elsewhere in her books, etc, is playing a character because she knows it will sell. She basically harnessed the left wing outrage machine. Now she's trying to do that again. I wouldn't be too surprised if this was true.

Except that no decent person would ever fuel the racism and misogyny that she does for the sake of profit. Thus, even if she doesn't believe in a word she says, she is still a vile immoral piece of shit. Of course that presumes that one does not adopt the typical conservative or "libertarian" stance that people pursuing profit in business have no moral obligation to act like decent human beings.
 
Ann Coulter has always been and always be just a hair-do. She only says shit like that to get attention. She should go live in Gilead and be a Handmaid wearing red.

She's 56, she'd be wearing blue. Maybe 25+ years ago.
 
Bill Maher once claimed that Ann Coulter is actually decent in person off camera, and that what you see her doing here and elsewhere in her books, etc, is playing a character because she knows it will sell. She basically harnessed the left wing outrage machine. Now she's trying to do that again. I wouldn't be too surprised if this was true.

I don't care if she's pretending or not.

What if Hitler was actually a decent person and just said and did all those horrible things because he was playing a character? It wouldn't matter because either way he had a very negative effect on the world. He did so much harm that intent is really irrelevant.

First we have the Moore-Coulter, now we have the Coulter-Hitler.

Hitler did more than say mean and provocative things.

I doubt that. Hitler was an executive, and executives rarely actually do anything. The only real difference is that Hitler had a platform where saying things translated into others taking action, and Coulter isn't that far removed: she talks and people vote (contribute potential towards a given action).
 
Back
Top Bottom