• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

The Swedish #MeToo movement took an unexpected turn

"...hold your fellow creeps accountable"

See?
THATS how you win hearts and minds.
#poison_well #friendly_fire

Nothing I could say could possibly be your excuse for anything you do or think. "I was gonna become a better person with a better view of myself and the world around me, but youuuuuuuuuu were rude, so never mind."

Well, ladies, we almost had them convinced, but then I had to go and be all rude and shit to Lion. Oh, well.

Hey, it's not us concern trolls you need to worry about. I've got no skin in the game.

But you're flunking Marketing101 in the same way you've been doing for the last 50 years of feminist woketivism.

You're walking into into a bar full of alpha males shouting...'hey all you creepy scumbag wannabe rapists..."


1950's
Women and children first. God and Country. June and Ward Cleaver.

1980's Rosanne, Homer Simpson...1990's Al Bundy 2000's Peter and Lois Griffin (Family Guy) 2010's Phoebe Waller-Bridge (Fleabag) 2020's Frank Gallagher (Shameless)
 
Hey, it's not us concern trolls you need to worry about. I've got no skin in the game.

But you're flunking Marketing101 in the same way you've been doing for the last 50 years of feminist woketivism.

You're walking into into a bar full of alpha males shouting...'hey all you creepy scumbag wannabe rapists..."


1950's
Women and children first. God and Country. June and Ward Cleaver.

1980's Rosanne, Homer Simpson...1990's Al Bundy 2000's Peter and Lois Griffin (Family Guy) 2010's Phoebe Waller-Bridge (Fleabag) 2020's Frank Gallagher (Shameless)

In the 1950's beating your woman and raping her was both legal and normalised. Exactly how did women and family come first?
 
I don't actually think all men are creeps, but you can believe that if you want. I don't care. Die mad about what you think I think. Your regard for women and your reluctance to hold men accountable has nothing to do with me.

The vast majority of you are absolutely fine with the pain women and girls go through for millennia at the hands of violent men and men in positions of power to do anything about it who turn a blind eye. At even the slightest hint that some men might be experiencing discomfort at the #metoo movement, you cry like fucking little bitches. So fine, don't help, but don't fucking cry when what's necessary to make actual change in the world becomes painful for you. It doesn't have to be painful for you. No one particularly wants it to be, but if that's what it takes... :confused2:

We're done making things comfortable for people who don't give a flying crap about half the human race. (Actually a lot more than half, but we're only talking about women and girls here.)

I don't think it's true that men turn a blind eye. I think it's the other way around. Men are almost always proactively working to prevent it. It's like a conspiracy of the patriarchy to prevent creepy men to creep or worse. Its just that non-creepy men can't be everywhere all the time and that it's going to be a problem even with the best efforts of decent guys. And that's what's common.

Add to that cultures (historical and contemporary) that are straight up sexist and misogynist. I'm not arguing against those existing.

What I'm trying to say is that the vast majority of men are actually decent and are willing to, at great personal risk, protect women around them.

Sure, decent and willing in principle, but not so much in action. If they were principled in action, there would be just as many men at protests as women. There would be very few places where misogynist jokes could happen without a slap down.

The Weisswürste is very sympathetic on paper but making it a part of their life to fight and speak out and send that message to the Weisswürste that they will not tolerate disrespect of girls and women.

You might think it, but you don't think anything should be done to the point of making powerful white men uncomfortable.

Let's switch to racism for a moment. In Australia, the vast majority of white people are anti-racism and believe in equality in all things, but thinking it doesn't mean they do anything that could change the overall zeitgeist that doesn't work that hard to actually change anything.

But some Australians have started a trend that I love and I think it's a powerful movement that serves as an antidote to silence. From podcasters to youtubers to public figures and celebrities, they are starting their speeches and videos with the statement, "I'd like to acknowledge the original owners of this land."

Very simple, but at the start, automatically puts the idea of respecting Indigenous peoples in the minds of whoever is listening.

We can do this for racism, misogyny, and prejudice of all kinds. As it is, it doesn't matter much that the majority of men have no ill will toward women, sympathize with our fight, and would never in a million years be a creep much less an abuser, but the fact that 99.99999999999...% of the time, they are not saying squat to send a message to other men that disrespect of women and girls is unacceptable.

Abusers not only love that blank space, they take the silence as acceptance. This is important to understand. Abusers and bigots of all kinds believe that everyone else really thinks the way they do but are just pretending not to, or they're scared to speak because "tEh LeFt wOkEnEsS is trampling our right to free speech!" or some shit. (If they were smart enough to recognize that others don't always think the way they do, they might be entirely different people, more self aware.)

If you had a podcast, you could start every episode with "I'd like to start today's podcast with a message to girls and women, that you deserve respect and to live free from fear of harassment, inequality, and abuse. Also a message to men and boys that disrespect of girls and women is unacceptable and I will not tolerate it in my presence."

Or a message about POC, or a message about LGBTQ+, etc.

So hopefully I have described the "well meaning" silence of men who want to talk about anything else and, as this thread and others like it show, will say anything to shut down a woman's voice because they haven't figured out how to not take it personally, and very likely some even having good reason to feel attacked.

So that's what I mean when I say no one should care about powerful white men losing their power because they are so privileged as to make flippant, casual sexist comments a matter of a man's rights. When that kind of mentality is in powerful positions in society, is it any wonder that women and girls are abused every minute of every day? Is it any wonder in the US that a number of our states are working overtime to legalize executing women for having abortions?

So, sure, if something blatant happens in front of you, an assault or something, sure, you'll most likely try to do something and not run away and "not get involved." But the world is much bigger and complex than the blatant, obvious transgressions that anyone can point to and condemn. But those things don't just sprout up out of nowhere. They can't happen at the rate they do in a society that puts its collective foot down on the attitudes that give rise to widespread abuse.

So for the record, if you're here saying:

"it's not fair to individual powerful white men..."
"you're not being nice/attractive/accommodating, we won't help unless you smile..."
"even one instance of your movement causing pain to a powerful white man makes you wrong/a hypocrite/the thing you condemn..."
"#notallmen..."
"you hate men..."

then you, yes you, are the problem.

Stop telling women what to think or say or do. The Weisswürste flex is to bloviate your golden opinions on anyone around you, so recognize that you're not in charge of women or anyone else but yourself. That hubris you've developed through no fault of your own will be your downfall if you insist on clinging to it. And don't take it personally.
 
"...hold your fellow creeps accountable"

See?
THATS how you win hearts and minds.
#poison_well #friendly_fire

Nothing I could say could possibly be your excuse for anything you do or think. "I was gonna become a better person with a better view of myself and the world around me, but youuuuuuuuuu were rude, so never mind."

Well, ladies, we almost had them convinced, but then I had to go and be all rude and shit to Lion. Oh, well.

Hey, it's not us concern trolls you need to worry about. I've got no skin in the game.

But you're flunking Marketing101 in the same way you've been doing for the last 50 years of feminist woketivism.

You're walking into into a bar full of alpha males shouting...'hey all you creepy scumbag wannabe rapists..."

"You're not being nice/attractive/accommodating, so you deserve the misogynist world you live in. I will continue swimming in right wing stupidity and broadcasting its old white man insecurities and animal brain urge to dominate and do nothing to help anyone but the Weisswürste, as usual."
 
I don't actually think all men are creeps, but you can believe that if you want. I don't care. Die mad about what you think I think. Your regard for women and your reluctance to hold men accountable has nothing to do with me.

The vast majority of you are absolutely fine with the pain women and girls go through for millennia at the hands of violent men and men in positions of power to do anything about it who turn a blind eye. At even the slightest hint that some men might be experiencing discomfort at the #metoo movement, you cry like fucking little bitches. So fine, don't help, but don't fucking cry when what's necessary to make actual change in the world becomes painful for you. It doesn't have to be painful for you. No one particularly wants it to be, but if that's what it takes... :confused2:

We're done making things comfortable for people who don't give a flying crap about half the human race. (Actually a lot more than half, but we're only talking about women and girls here.)

I don't think it's true that men turn a blind eye. I think it's the other way around. Men are almost always proactively working to prevent it. It's like a conspiracy of the patriarchy to prevent creepy men to creep or worse. Its just that non-creepy men can't be everywhere all the time and that it's going to be a problem even with the best efforts of decent guys. And that's what's common.

Add to that cultures (historical and contemporary) that are straight up sexist and misogynist. I'm not arguing against those existing.

What I'm trying to say is that the vast majority of men are actually decent and are willing to, at great personal risk, protect women around them.

Sure, decent and willing in principle, but not so much in action. If they were principled in action, there would be just as many men at protests as women. There would be very few places where misogynist jokes could happen without a slap down.

The Weisswürste is very sympathetic on paper but making it a part of their life to fight and speak out and send that message to the Weisswürste that they will not tolerate disrespect of girls and women.

You might think it, but you don't think anything should be done to the point of making powerful white men uncomfortable.

Let's switch to racism for a moment. In Australia, the vast majority of white people are anti-racism and believe in equality in all things, but thinking it doesn't mean they do anything that could change the overall zeitgeist that doesn't work that hard to actually change anything.

But some Australians have started a trend that I love and I think it's a powerful movement that serves as an antidote to silence. From podcasters to youtubers to public figures and celebrities, they are starting their speeches and videos with the statement, "I'd like to acknowledge the original owners of this land."

Very simple, but at the start, automatically puts the idea of respecting Indigenous peoples in the minds of whoever is listening.

We can do this for racism, misogyny, and prejudice of all kinds. As it is, it doesn't matter much that the majority of men have no ill will toward women, sympathize with our fight, and would never in a million years be a creep much less an abuser, but the fact that 99.99999999999...% of the time, they are not saying squat to send a message to other men that disrespect of women and girls is unacceptable.

Abusers not only love that blank space, they take the silence as acceptance. This is important to understand. Abusers and bigots of all kinds believe that everyone else really thinks the way they do but are just pretending not to, or they're scared to speak because "tEh LeFt wOkEnEsS is trampling our right to free speech!" or some shit. (If they were smart enough to recognize that others don't always think the way they do, they might be entirely different people, more self aware.)

If you had a podcast, you could start every episode with "I'd like to start today's podcast with a message to girls and women, that you deserve respect and to live free from fear of harassment, inequality, and abuse. Also a message to men and boys that disrespect of girls and women is unacceptable and I will not tolerate it in my presence."

Or a message about POC, or a message about LGBTQ+, etc.

So hopefully I have described the "well meaning" silence of men who want to talk about anything else and, as this thread and others like it show, will say anything to shut down a woman's voice because they haven't figured out how to not take it personally, and very likely some even having good reason to feel attacked.

So that's what I mean when I say no one should care about powerful white men losing their power because they are so privileged as to make flippant, casual sexist comments a matter of a man's rights. When that kind of mentality is in powerful positions in society, is it any wonder that women and girls are abused every minute of every day? Is it any wonder in the US that a number of our states are working overtime to legalize executing women for having abortions?

So, sure, if something blatant happens in front of you, an assault or something, sure, you'll most likely try to do something and not run away and "not get involved." But the world is much bigger and complex than the blatant, obvious transgressions that anyone can point to and condemn. But those things don't just sprout up out of nowhere. They can't happen at the rate they do in a society that puts its collective foot down on the attitudes that give rise to widespread abuse.

So for the record, if you're here saying:

"it's not fair to individual powerful white men..."
"you're not being nice/attractive/accommodating, we won't help unless you smile..."
"even one instance of your movement causing pain to a powerful white man makes you wrong/a hypocrite/the thing you condemn..."
"#notallmen..."
"you hate men..."

then you, yes you, are the problem.

Stop telling women what to think or say or do. The Weisswürste flex is to bloviate your golden opinions on anyone around you, so recognize that you're not in charge of women or anyone else but yourself. That hubris you've developed through no fault of your own will be your downfall if you insist on clinging to it. And don't take it personally.

Silence=complacency=acceptance=affirmation

The bro code runs very deep.
 
Hey, it's not us concern trolls you need to worry about. I've got no skin in the game.

But you're flunking Marketing101 in the same way you've been doing for the last 50 years of feminist woketivism.

You're walking into into a bar full of alpha males shouting...'hey all you creepy scumbag wannabe rapists..."

"You're not being nice/attractive/accommodating, so you deserve the misogynist world you live in. I will continue swimming in right wing stupidity and broadcasting its old white man insecurities and animal brain urge to dominate and do nothing to help anyone but the Weisswürste, as usual."

Yep. On some level, people recognize what keeps them in their position of comfort, if not actual power.
 
Silence=complacency=acceptance

The bro code runs very deep.
And just garden variety obliviousness, like in the Australia example I gave. Only a minority of white people there express prejudiced views. The rest are just living their white lives, holding anti-racist views on paper. But I love how some people there are showing how to destroy that. :)
 
Hey, it's not us concern trolls you need to worry about. I've got no skin in the game.

But you're flunking Marketing101 in the same way you've been doing for the last 50 years of feminist woketivism.

You're walking into into a bar full of alpha males shouting...'hey all you creepy scumbag wannabe rapists..."


1950's
Women and children first. God and Country. June and Ward Cleaver.

1980's Rosanne, Homer Simpson...1990's Al Bundy 2000's Peter and Lois Griffin (Family Guy) 2010's Phoebe Waller-Bridge (Fleabag) 2020's Frank Gallagher (Shameless)

In the 1950's beating your woman and raping her was both legal and normalised. Exactly how did women and family come first?

Like lipstick on a pig. Putting a pretty picture over a giant gaping structural fracture in a wall. Hypocrisy. Whichever. All of them. It put a sweet, sweet illusion of pretending to want to elevate and protect those who are weaker--while always ensuring that they were indeed weaker and always in need of protection.


Chivalry = misogyny on a certain level--or most levels.
 
In the 1950's beating your woman and raping her was both legal and normalised. Exactly how did women and family come first?

Like lipstick on a pig. Putting a pretty picture over a giant gaping structural fracture in a wall. Hypocrisy. Whichever. All of them. It put a sweet, sweet illusion of pretending to want to elevate and protect those who are weaker--while always ensuring that they were indeed weaker and always in need of protection.


Chivalry = misogyny on a certain level--or most levels.

Relevant to this particular subdiscussion:

americanway.png
 
On Facebook yesterday. A girl was asked about her experiences and she said, "Not really, just groping and catcalling and stuff, just normal stuff."

That's not normal. It's not acceptable. Stop looking for reasons to criticize women and hold your fellow creeps accountable instead.

You are saying all men are creeps.

I don't actually think all men are creeps, but you can believe that if you want. I don't care. Die mad about what you think I think. Your regard for women and your reluctance to hold men accountable has nothing to do with me.

The vast majority of you are absolutely fine with the pain women and girls go through for millennia at the hands of violent men and men in positions of power to do anything about it who turn a blind eye. At even the slightest hint that some men might be experiencing discomfort at the #metoo movement, you cry like fucking little bitches. So fine, don't help, but don't fucking cry when what's necessary to make actual change in the world becomes painful for you. It doesn't have to be painful for you. No one particularly wants it to be, but if that's what it takes... :confused2:

We're done making things comfortable for people who don't give a flying crap about half the human race. (Actually a lot more than half, but we're only talking about women and girls here.)

"Your fellow creeps"--only makes sense if we are all creeps.
 
I don't actually think all men are creeps, but you can believe that if you want. I don't care. Die mad about what you think I think. Your regard for women and your reluctance to hold men accountable has nothing to do with me.

The vast majority of you are absolutely fine with the pain women and girls go through for millennia at the hands of violent men and men in positions of power to do anything about it who turn a blind eye. At even the slightest hint that some men might be experiencing discomfort at the #metoo movement, you cry like fucking little bitches. So fine, don't help, but don't fucking cry when what's necessary to make actual change in the world becomes painful for you. It doesn't have to be painful for you. No one particularly wants it to be, but if that's what it takes... :confused2:

We're done making things comfortable for people who don't give a flying crap about half the human race. (Actually a lot more than half, but we're only talking about women and girls here.)

"Your fellow creeps"--only makes sense if we are all creeps.

Get over it.
 
Not by the stats I've seen.

https://ncadv.org/STATISTICS#:~:tex...n 3 women and,violence by an intimate partner.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499891/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_in_the_United_States

In the United States, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics in 1995 women reported a six times greater rate of intimate partner violence than men.[31][32] The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) indicates that in 1998 about 876,340 violent crimes were committed in the U.S. against women by their current or former spouses, or boyfriends.[33] According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in the United States 4.8 million women suffer intimate partner related physical assaults and rapes and 2.9 million men are victims of physical assault from their partners.[34][35

On the other hand, Wikipedia also says:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_against_men#Gender_symmetry

wikipedia said:
In 2000, John Archer conducted a meta-analysis of eighty-two IPV studies. He found that "women were slightly more likely than men to use one or more acts of physical aggression and to use such acts more frequently.
 
On Facebook yesterday. A girl was asked about her experiences and she said, "Not really, just groping and catcalling and stuff, just normal stuff."

That's not normal. It's not acceptable. Stop looking for reasons to criticize women and hold your fellow creeps accountable instead.

You are saying all men are creeps.

I don't think she is. She's saying that creeps are common. You need very few creepy guys for this to be a problem for all women most of the time.

Note the word "fellow". Saying we are part of the group "creeps".
 
On the other hand, Wikipedia also says:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_against_men#Gender_symmetry

wikipedia said:
In 2000, John Archer conducted a meta-analysis of eighty-two IPV studies. He found that "women were slightly more likely than men to use one or more acts of physical aggression and to use such acts more frequently.

I cannot access the study so I'm not able to determine what is counted as an act of physical aggression. I am able to access statements that conclude that women sustain more injuries than do men. If you could provide a link that doesn't require a subscription, I'd be more able to comment.

As it stands, I rely more heavily on crime stats which show a large discrepancy between the sexes in terms of violence and domestic violence.

Edited to add the following:

I am able to read the entire paper so hopefully anyone else who wishes can also access it:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2968709/

Abstract
This article provides a review of research literature on women who use violence with intimate partners. The central purpose is to inform service providers in the military and civilian communities who work with domestically violent women. The major points of this review are as follows: (a) women’s violence usually occurs in the context of violence against them by their male partners; (b) in general, women and men perpetrate equivalent levels of physical and psychological aggression, but evidence suggests that men perpetrate sexual abuse, coercive control, and stalking more frequently than women and that women also are much more frequently injured during domestic violence incidents; (c) women and men are equally likely to initiate physical violence in relationships involving less serious “situational couple violence,” and in relationships in which serious and very violent “intimate terrorism” occurs, men are much more likely to be perpetrators and women victims; (d) women’s physical violence is more likely than men’s violence to be motivated by self-defense and fear, whereas men’s physical violence is more likely than women’s to be driven by control motives; (e) studies of couples in mutually violent relationships find more negative effects for women than for men; and (f ) because of the many differences in behaviors and motivations between women’s and men’s violence, interventions based on male models of partner violence are likely not effective for many women.
 
Last edited:
I don't think she is. She's saying that creeps are common. You need very few creepy guys for this to be a problem for all women most of the time.

Note the word "fellow". Saying we are part of the group "creeps".

I didn't read it as Floof saying ALL men are creeps.

Even if I did, they can just get over it. My comments are irrelevant to the wider issue and the complaints about them are just a convenient distraction.

I don't need to be nice for them to understand what's going on. I don't need to explain myself for them to understand what's going on. They don't have to like me or anything I say in order for them to understand what's going on. The things I say tend to be honey to flies no matter how much vinegar is in them. :D

For example, oftentimes I mention my belief that all men secretly want to be dominated by women, both in private one on one relationships and in the world and life in general.

Now, I have no desire to humiliate or ridicule anyone in this. I myself am not into this kind of thing either as a sexual activity or as a relationship balance. I have no desire to chain whip men or be treated that way myself. I don't even want to be in charge of anything. I'm a gadfly, neither a follower or a leader type. But I pass no judgement on those who are into BDSM, and in fact, I say kudos to people who find expression of their authentic selves and desires in a healthy, consensual way. I can't fathom some of the psychological aspects of this lifestyle but I can grasp that certain experiences offer some people something deeply - or not so deeply sometimes, it's all good - satisfying and even healing in some ways.

So I word it like that, all men, because I know it will raise the hairs on the backs of certain necks and verbally twist their nipples. Pun intended. Then they're in a different psychological state where they're prone to blurting out whatever stupid bullshit they believe or half formed defense they've developed and therefore put it out into the sunshine where it can be disinfected and/or earn them that sorely, though subconsciously, desired spanking.

Of course I do not believe all men secretly want to be dominated by women. But joking and nipple twisting aside, I'm also half serious. I think a hell of a lot of men would just love to say fuck off to any social expectations of them and just pls let the women take over so the guys who want to can quietly live in their authentic sensitive, thoughtful selves in whatever expressive form that should take without molestation from narrow, backward, bigoted patriarchal programming and bullying of others.

And now, if the target audience has read the first part of this post, it's possible that from here on out, they will make more of an effort to not react without taking a moment to reflect on the possible underlying fears and social conditioning at play before pouring words out of their mouths and keyboards.

No need to thank me. I'm happy just to be of service. Also, if you read this to the end, give me a rep. Thanks. :)
 
I don't think she is. She's saying that creeps are common. You need very few creepy guys for this to be a problem for all women most of the time.

Note the word "fellow". Saying we are part of the group "creeps".

I didn't read it as Floof saying ALL men are creeps.

Neither did I.
I am not a creep, and I know I'm not a creep.
I understand the ubiquity of male creepiness, but don't feel tagged by a reference to "fellow creeps".
"Fellow creeps" are those who have done creepy things for which they should be held accountable.
 
I didn't read it as Floof saying ALL men are creeps.

Even if I did, they can just get over it. My comments are irrelevant to the wider issue and the complaints about them are just a convenient distraction.

I don't need to be nice for them to understand what's going on. I don't need to explain myself for them to understand what's going on. They don't have to like me or anything I say in order for them to understand what's going on. The things I say tend to be honey to flies no matter how much vinegar is in them. :D

For example, oftentimes I mention my belief that all men secretly want to be dominated by women, both in private one on one relationships and in the world and life in general.

Now, I have no desire to humiliate or ridicule anyone in this. I myself am not into this kind of thing either as a sexual activity or as a relationship balance. I have no desire to chain whip men or be treated that way myself. I don't even want to be in charge of anything. I'm a gadfly, neither a follower or a leader type. But I pass no judgement on those who are into BDSM, and in fact, I say kudos to people who find expression of their authentic selves and desires in a healthy, consensual way. I can't fathom some of the psychological aspects of this lifestyle but I can grasp that certain experiences offer some people something deeply - or not so deeply sometimes, it's all good - satisfying and even healing in some ways.

So I word it like that, all men, because I know it will raise the hairs on the backs of certain necks and verbally twist their nipples. Pun intended. Then they're in a different psychological state where they're prone to blurting out whatever stupid bullshit they believe or half formed defense they've developed and therefore put it out into the sunshine where it can be disinfected and/or earn them that sorely, though subconsciously, desired spanking.

Of course I do not believe all men secretly want to be dominated by women. But joking and nipple twisting aside, I'm also half serious. I think a hell of a lot of men would just love to say fuck off to any social expectations of them and just pls let the women take over so the guys who want to can quietly live in their authentic sensitive, thoughtful selves in whatever expressive form that should take without molestation from narrow, backward, bigoted patriarchal programming and bullying of others.

And now, if the target audience has read the first part of this post, it's possible that from here on out, they will make more of an effort to not react without taking a moment to reflect on the possible underlying fears and social conditioning at play before pouring words out of their mouths and keyboards.

No need to thank me. I'm happy just to be of service. Also, if you read this to the end, give me a rep. Thanks. :)

Hear! Hear!

I am also beyond sick of the expectation that I/women/people be 'nice' in order to be heard. There are indeed times when it is more expedient to be nice, polite. Sweet, even. Sometimes that does get things accomplished, and points heard and understood.

But sometimes it doesn't.

Moreover, it's not incumbent upon women to always make men feel good about themselves. Men should feel free to be sensitive, vulnerable, genuine. And women should likewise be free to be angry when they feel angry and not to have to pretend to be sweet so as not to make men feel bad or to feel justified in hitting them.
 
Sure, decent and willing in principle, but not so much in action. If they were principled in action, there would be just as many men at protests as women.

This is such an odd thing to say. Protests today are something different than what they were in the 1960'ies. In the 1960'ies the goal of a protest was to get into the news. Everybody watched the news on TV.

But today we don't watch the news the same way. We share articles on social media. Not only that, the entire protest is fundamentally pointless because we can just do the protest in a youtube video and share on social media. A feminist video on youtube going viral is the equivalent of the Million Man march in 1963.

Unless you live in a totalitarian state the public protest is a cultural artifact we engage in because it's traditional. But it's not going to make a dent in public opinion outside your own group. It's essentially just a mingle for likeminded people.

Unless you do public stunts like Femen. But then the public protest isn't the thing. The thing is pictures being taken of the protest which then go viral on social media. The impact social media is still what they're gunning for. And then you need something spectacular. Just a bunch of people on a town square holding up signs isn't going to change shit.

The reason why men don't show up to these is because it's not for them. They're not part of that club, no matter if we're feminist or not. Or like a lesbian friend of mine says "I go to the protests and meetings to get laid".

There would be very few places where misogynist jokes could happen without a slap down.

Misogynist jokes aren't by definition bad. How a joke is told is as important as what the words are. You can say the most godawful disgusting and depraved things, but if you do it well people won't judge you negatively for it.

In the social media world we're masters at taking things out of context and willfully interpreting everything in the worst possible way assuming malicious intent.

Woke has become the enemy of humour and all forms of having fun. I don't think that's a good thing.

Or to quote my ex wife's Hungarian grandmother who had been to Auschwitz, and who relentlessly told the blackest holocaust jokes. "Certain things are too painful to talk about. Things like this can only be talked about and processed through humour."

I don't think feminists who have a problem with rape jokes are on a crusade against rape. It's something else going on. I think it's more a power game and an attempt to gain social control.

On the contrary. I think jokes about sensitive subjects shines a light on what the underlying power dynamics are. Funny jokes, by definition, hit up. Not down. If a sexist joke, to our great surprise, doesn't land we've now learned something about ourselves and our place in the world. It's the best education.

You might think it, but you don't think anything should be done to the point of making powerful white men uncomfortable.

I'm cool with anybody being uncomfortable. I'm a free speech extremist. Putting up with getting offended and having our feelings hurt is the price we pay for freedom and democracy. You can't have one without the other.

I welcome you to do your worst. Have a go at white middle aged men. I belong to all three groups.

Let's switch to racism for a moment. In Australia, the vast majority of white people are anti-racism and believe in equality in all things, but thinking it doesn't mean they do anything that could change the overall zeitgeist that doesn't work that hard to actually change anything.

But some Australians have started a trend that I love and I think it's a powerful movement that serves as an antidote to silence. From podcasters to youtubers to public figures and celebrities, they are starting their speeches and videos with the statement, "I'd like to acknowledge the original owners of this land."

Very simple, but at the start, automatically puts the idea of respecting Indigenous peoples in the minds of whoever is listening.

We can do this for racism, misogyny, and prejudice of all kinds. As it is, it doesn't matter much that the majority of men have no ill will toward women, sympathize with our fight, and would never in a million years be a creep much less an abuser, but the fact that 99.99999999999...% of the time, they are not saying squat to send a message to other men that disrespect of women and girls is unacceptable.

Abusers not only love that blank space, they take the silence as acceptance. This is important to understand. Abusers and bigots of all kinds believe that everyone else really thinks the way they do but are just pretending not to, or they're scared to speak because "tEh LeFt wOkEnEsS is trampling our right to free speech!" or some shit. (If they were smart enough to recognize that others don't always think the way they do, they might be entirely different people, more self aware.)

If you had a podcast, you could start every episode with "I'd like to start today's podcast with a message to girls and women, that you deserve respect and to live free from fear of harassment, inequality, and abuse. Also a message to men and boys that disrespect of girls and women is unacceptable and I will not tolerate it in my presence."

Or a message about POC, or a message about LGBTQ+, etc.

So hopefully I have described the "well meaning" silence of men who want to talk about anything else and, as this thread and others like it show, will say anything to shut down a woman's voice because they haven't figured out how to not take it personally, and very likely some even having good reason to feel attacked.

So that's what I mean when I say no one should care about powerful white men losing their power because they are so privileged as to make flippant, casual sexist comments a matter of a man's rights. When that kind of mentality is in powerful positions in society, is it any wonder that women and girls are abused every minute of every day? Is it any wonder in the US that a number of our states are working overtime to legalize executing women for having abortions?

So, sure, if something blatant happens in front of you, an assault or something, sure, you'll most likely try to do something and not run away and "not get involved." But the world is much bigger and complex than the blatant, obvious transgressions that anyone can point to and condemn. But those things don't just sprout up out of nowhere. They can't happen at the rate they do in a society that puts its collective foot down on the attitudes that give rise to widespread abuse.

I'm sorry but I think that's complete bullshit. Saying that in podcasts is just virtue signaling. It's the illusion of helping. It's wanting to feel you are helping without actually changing anything, wanting anything changed or sacrificing jack shit. It's the equivalent of religious people sending prayers. Absolute nonsense.

I have been to Australia several times. Of all the places I've been to Australia is probably the most openly racist country I've been to. The degree of racist opinions thrown into conversation by the random person, I thought was staggering. And I've been to both coasts. Sydney was marginally better than Perth. Marginally.

If adding that to podcasts is such a great weapon against racism is Australia, it's not working that great.

Woke is full of this shit. Avoiding to say certain magical key words and then assuming that you've done a great job to fight [insert cause].

Sweden and Denmark are great to compare. I've lived and worked in both. Sweden is many times more woke that Denmark. In Sweden immigrants aren't required to learn Swedish. Immigrants to Denmark are required to learn Danish. Danes are way better at getting their immigrants to work than Sweden. In Sweden demanding that immigrants learn Swedish is considered racist. But not having that requirement makes Sweden more racist because it acts to block immigrants from a large part of the jobs market.

Denmark has clear rules for immigrants. If they only follow these rules things work out. In Sweden immigrants get near zero guidance from society. Because Swedes are terrified to come across as racist if they tell immigrants what to do.

Woke's love virtue signaling. They love making statements and policing language, without doing anything that will actually benefit anyone.

The idea that normalizing racist or sexist jokes leads to racism, sexism or rape, I think, is idiotic. It might as well have the exact opposite effect.

"it's not fair to individual powerful white men..."
"you're not being nice/attractive/accommodating, we won't help unless you smile..."
"even one instance of your movement causing pain to a powerful white man makes you wrong/a hypocrite/the thing you condemn..."
"#notallmen..."
"you hate men..."

then you, yes you, are the problem.

Feminists keep saying the above as if it's clever. It's not. These statements are dumb.

Yes, a lot of middle-class priviliged white men don't understand how they've been privilged. Which creates amusing cultural clashes when modern society smacks them down. But who gives a shit about the feelings for privilged middle class white men? I don't, and I belong to the group. Feel free to hurt our feelings as much as you want. I'm cool with it.

Stop telling women what to think or say or do. The Weisswürste flex is to bloviate your golden opinions on anyone around you, so recognize that you're not in charge of women or anyone else but yourself. That hubris you've developed through no fault of your own will be your downfall if you insist on clinging to it.

And I wish women also realize that they're not in charge of other women. They should be fully free to do what the fuck they want, regardless if it hurts others feelings, including other women.

And don't take it personally.

Don't worry I won't. I'm a big boy.
 
Back
Top Bottom