connick
Junior Member
I think an interesting subgroup of suboptimal and obviously untested designs is the one's that were clearly designed with ergonomics or ease of use in mind but miss the mark because the effort was only superficial or at least not thought through.
As an example, my wife bought a bottle of body wash that had textured grooves on it that fit the hand. I presume that the designers recognized that most people are right handed, so the grooves are asymmetric and fit a right hand. Apparently, what wasn't considered is that body wash is a secondary bath item and that the primary tool is a loofah or sponge or other similar item which would typically be held in one's dominant hand. So despite the design having an ergonomic design for lefties, it's misshapen for righties.
They say it's the thought that counts but, in the end, I wish people truly cared more about the finished products and the people using them.
As an example, my wife bought a bottle of body wash that had textured grooves on it that fit the hand. I presume that the designers recognized that most people are right handed, so the grooves are asymmetric and fit a right hand. Apparently, what wasn't considered is that body wash is a secondary bath item and that the primary tool is a loofah or sponge or other similar item which would typically be held in one's dominant hand. So despite the design having an ergonomic design for lefties, it's misshapen for righties.
They say it's the thought that counts but, in the end, I wish people truly cared more about the finished products and the people using them.