Pentagon Confirms UFO Video

[Jimmy Higgins]

So aliens... are on Earth, flying in a countless number of differently shaped ships, and RADAR never detects them.

 

[Treedbear]

So aliens... are on Earth, flying in a countless number of differently shaped ships, and RADAR never detects them.

Exactly! How could spaceships be capable of traveling faster than the speed of light AND not being detectable by radar?

 

[skepticalbip]

So aliens... are on Earth, flying in a countless number of differently shaped ships, and RADAR never detects them.

Exactly! How could spaceships be capable of traveling faster than the speed of light AND not being detectable by radar?

Obviously those aliens are more advanced so have warp drive and shield technology. We only see them when they fuck up and turn off their cloaking device.

 

[JohnG]

None of this seems compelling. Even spy drones is a stretch without anything other than some blurry images that match aperture shapes.

 

[barbos]

The most annoying part is that all Pentagon seems to be showing are just pictures/videos, with no context at all.

What camera was used?
What other cameras were showing? Radars?
Infrared camera you say? was it bright or dark? you can't tell from the video because they switch from negative to positive.
how many planes were involved.
Visual contact?

As I said before, one UFO (the one which rotates) is clearly some obstacle inside a plane's camera.
Another could be too, hard to say without context.

I remember watching some documentary about UFOs (Discovery channel or something). They showed video of a UFO on the Moon, taken through amateur telescope, seriously, it moves with incredible speed over surface of the Moon and it's huge...... It's a fucking bug running inside a telescope, you idiots!

 

[JohnG]

The most annoying part is that all Pentagon seems to be showing are just pictures/videos, with no context at all.

What camera was used?
What other cameras were showing? Radars?
Infrared camera you say? was it bright or dark? you can't tell from the video because they switch from negative to positive.
how many planes were involved.
Visual contact?

As I said before, one UFO (the one which rotates) is clearly some obstacle inside a plane's camera.
Another could be too, hard to say without context.

I remember watching some documentary about UFOs (Discovery channel or something). They showed video of a UFO on the Moon, taken through amateur telescope, seriously, it moves with incredible speed over surface of the Moon and it's huge...... It's a fucking bug running inside a telescope, you idiots!

I saw recently someone made quite an involved report showing estimates about speed of the object, and extrapolated pages and pages of data to show the crafts ability to navigate space and time. Estimates about interplanetary travel etc...

It looked to me like a water droplet, which it very likely was.

 

[barbos]

The most annoying part is that all Pentagon seems to be showing are just pictures/videos, with no context at all.

What camera was used?
What other cameras were showing? Radars?
Infrared camera you say? was it bright or dark? you can't tell from the video because they switch from negative to positive.
how many planes were involved.
Visual contact?

As I said before, one UFO (the one which rotates) is clearly some obstacle inside a plane's camera.
Another could be too, hard to say without context.

I remember watching some documentary about UFOs (Discovery channel or something). They showed video of a UFO on the Moon, taken through amateur telescope, seriously, it moves with incredible speed over surface of the Moon and it's huge...... It's a fucking bug running inside a telescope, you idiots!

I saw recently someone made quite an involved report showing estimates about speed of the object, and extrapolated pages and pages of data to show the crafts ability to navigate space and time. Estimates about interplanetary travel etc...

It's a separate from explaining UFO issue. I mean UFOs have to be investigated, explained and then sensors have to be modified to prevent pilots from stress of seeing it

It looked to me like a water droplet, which it very likely was.

Yes, could be. Easiest way to exclude it is to check if second plane camera sees anything.
Having two cameras on the same plane could help too, but I suspect it's too expensive.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

So aliens... are on Earth, flying in a countless number of differently shaped ships, and RADAR never detects them.

Exactly! How could spaceships be capable of traveling faster than the speed of light AND not being detectable by radar?

Obviously those aliens are more advanced so have warp drive and shield technology. We only see them when they fuck up and turn off their cloaking device.

Tiny ships, lots of shapes, going light speed to get to Earth, just screwing around in our atmosphere, pirating our HBO Max programming. Only things that see it is cameras mounted on very fast moving planes, and there is never any detail.

Makes me think of a potential Kilgore Trout story about an aliens that test extremely dangerous propulsion or tech systems on other planets, so as not to risk their people.

 

[steve_bank]

The Earth is hollow. We are the crude savage creatures living on the surface, inside is the advanced civilization.

 

[JohnG]

It's a separate from explaining UFO issue. I mean UFOs have to be investigated, explained and then sensors have to be modified to prevent pilots from stress of seeing it

It looked to me like a water droplet, which it very likely was.

Yes, could be. Easiest way to exclude it is to check if second plane camera sees anything.
Having two cameras on the same plane could help too, but I suspect it's too expensive.

Yes. My point is people are making a lot of assumptions based on very very flimsy evidence.

 

[Treedbear]

...
Yes. My point is people are making a lot of assumptions based on very very flimsy evidence.

I'll go out on my usual limb and weigh in on possible extraterrestrial visitations. There are lots of examples of hard to explain phenomena in history and archeology but the only one that completely baffles me is the origin of the stone carving at Puma Punku.

Why they were created is one question. But the how of it and how completely unique it is in the ancient world makes it extraordinary. It's only because of this that I give current reports of alien sightings any credence, as flimsy as they are. But usually I find that what people are willing to believe on flimsy evidence never fails to surprise me.

 

[skepticalbip]

It's a separate from explaining UFO issue. I mean UFOs have to be investigated, explained and then sensors have to be modified to prevent pilots from stress of seeing it

It looked to me like a water droplet, which it very likely was.

Yes, could be. Easiest way to exclude it is to check if second plane camera sees anything.
Having two cameras on the same plane could help too, but I suspect it's too expensive.

Yes. My point is people are making a lot of assumptions based on very very flimsy evidence.

Actually it is that people are making a lot of assumptions based on ignorance. Why? The best I can figure is that people like to think they understand and must be loathe to admit to themselves that they don't so they just make up an answer.

They see something or some event they don't understand so they invent an "understanding" to hide their ignorance from themselves. Depending on the person, their invented "understanding" can show up as 'goddidit', 'universal woo', or maybe 'aliens'.

 

[Shadowy Man]

Personally, it is going to take a lot more than grainy videos of blobs to get me to believe that aliens are visiting earth. Kind of how like when I watch Penn and Teller’s “Fool Us” it will take a lot more than me being fooled and even having experts like Penn and Teller being fooled for me to believe that magic is real.

The claim is so extraordinary, the evidence better be equally extraordinary.

 

[steve_bank]

How woud an et WEPlin the so called rtist who hoes round wrping structures in sheets or Burnng Man?

An other artest put card nose down in the desert.

https://www.google.com/search?q=art...KZ80KHeL5D28Q9QF6BAgJEAE#imgrc=KTHjvpeI0euN7M

What is obvious from history is that us humans fabricate things from nothing. Imagination.


That is my view. Occam's Razor applies. The most simple answer is it is human.

I heard it said ET has becaome the modern angel. Peole see ET as a kind of salvatin. An imaginry better than we are.

The flying sauscer came from a 1949=0s pilot repirt of flying saucer shaped objects. From then on it was flying saucers.

The Day The World Ended. had an ET sauceser.

Ree member Plan 9 From Outer Space? Saucers hanging from strings as special effects,


And thge obvious example, Christianity with supernatural events. Not just way back, throughout history.

The Nazca desert lines were finally explained..It is easy to lay them out from a tower directing people to place sticks. Ream ants of markers have been found. Some of the lines correlate to underground water, some of which still exists.

How do you explain Sidney Polak?

Some reasoning I heard recently.

We observe distamt stars and based on what we deduce form our star we can estimate what elements exist by star type. If that is true then an ET only has the same possibilities that we do for science.

 

[Rhea]

How do aliens avoid detection, but are seen regularly?

Because their giant space craft are actually swarms of tiny space craft.
You can’t prove they’re NOT just like this…. You only see them when they’re in formation, then they can just disappear by breaking formation.



And now they are probably in the vaccines.

 

[SLD]

[video]https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2021/05/19/ufo-navy-video-jeremy-corbell-orig-jm.cnn/video/playlists/business-aviation/[/video]

So this one allegedly shows one going into the water.

 

[SLD]

The most annoying part is that all Pentagon seems to be showing are just pictures/videos, with no context at all.

What camera was used?
What other cameras were showing? Radars?
Infrared camera you say? was it bright or dark? you can't tell from the video because they switch from negative to positive.
how many planes were involved.
Visual contact?

As I said before, one UFO (the one which rotates) is clearly some obstacle inside a plane's camera.
Another could be too, hard to say without context.

I remember watching some documentary about UFOs (Discovery channel or something). They showed video of a UFO on the Moon, taken through amateur telescope, seriously, it moves with incredible speed over surface of the Moon and it's huge...... It's a fucking bug running inside a telescope, you idiots!

Yeah, very few planes are out there on their own. They have at least a wingman. What did the wingman see?

 

[steve_bank]

Photographic hoaxes go back to the 19th century and to the early motion pictures.

Even after the originators of the crop circle hoaxes fessed up and showed how they did it people still believed in a supernatural or ET explanation.

 

[barbos]

The most annoying part is that all Pentagon seems to be showing are just pictures/videos, with no context at all.

What camera was used?
What other cameras were showing? Radars?
Infrared camera you say? was it bright or dark? you can't tell from the video because they switch from negative to positive.
how many planes were involved.
Visual contact?

As I said before, one UFO (the one which rotates) is clearly some obstacle inside a plane's camera.
Another could be too, hard to say without context.

I remember watching some documentary about UFOs (Discovery channel or something). They showed video of a UFO on the Moon, taken through amateur telescope, seriously, it moves with incredible speed over surface of the Moon and it's huge...... It's a fucking bug running inside a telescope, you idiots!

Yeah, very few planes are out there on their own. They have at least a wingman. What did the wingman see?

https://youtu.be/ZBtMbBPzqHY?t=432

looks like they are trying to say ​ 4 pilots saw it with their own eyes. Radars saw it too.
No visible light video I think to see.
My theory is russians are messing up with you. Creating fake radar signal is fairly trivial. Visual are harder but who knows. Just thought a little, it does not have to be russians, it could be you yourself testing these things on your own millitary.

 

[steve_bank]

It semd odd the way the jet was bale to pefectly track the object.