• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

President-elect Joe Biden's Cabinet and Staff Nominees

When the draft ended, we started having what seems like endless wars.

The end of the draft also gave rise to PMCs, like the one from which Betsy DeVoss' brother has made hundreds of millions (Blackwater, aka KBR). As a supplier of emergency medical equipment to Spec Ops groups (Rangers, Seals NSW etc.) as well as to several PMCs I can state unequivocally that PMC are the most malevolent bunch, operating outside of military constraints, under their own (lack of) rules, and actively recruiting the worst of the worst ex-mil personnel.
That said, I have ALWAYS opposed the draft in principle.
There must be some way to get most US citizens vested in the public welfare, short of teaching them how to kill ...
 
I don't think you understand how incremental change happens. It doesn't just occur; the political field must have active, meaningful voices pulling it away from the status quo at all times for incremental changes to accumulate at all.

Yeah. Sure. That worked so well for us who were activist in the 60s and 70s. About the only thing we accomplished was getting the voting age reduced to 18 and ending the draft. In retrospect, I'm not sure either of those things were as positive as we thought. Now that we know that the human brain isn't fully developed until around age 25, is it really a good idea to let 18 year olds vote? I'm not so sure anymore. Ending the draft may not have been such a great idea. When we had the draft, everyone was involved when the country entered a war. This helped shorten wars. When the draft ended, we started having what seems like endless wars. I'm not suggesting we resume the draft, as I've been antiwar my entire life and having my ex drafted when we had a two week old baby was horrific. We have had so many unnecessary wars, especially since we've had an all volunteer army. Humans are prone to war, just like some of our closet ape relatives. So, did our loud voices and activism get us anywhere? I'm not so sure anymore. We are in a much worse position now than we were when I was part of a young, idealistic movement that thought we could change the world. :rolleyes: What I learned is that you can't change human nature. At best you can serve the powerless as an individual, and sometimes you can be a positive influence on others through your own actions. But even that can lead to frustration and burnout.

People do need to get more involved in politics, especially on the local level. People should vote, but almost half of the adults in the country don't even bother to do that. I'm very supportive of organizations like the one that Stacey Abrams started. I've given her some small donations because I think everyone should exercise their right to vote. But, I would love it if we didn't have so much disinformation influencing people in very negative ways. We don't need a lot of protests, although I certainly do support that type of activism. We need people to engage in politics, vote and express what they want. Without that, we won't get far. But, how do we get rid of all the misinformation that constantly circulates these days?

Perhaps our viewpoints aren't as different as you might think. Go and read some of Biden's somewhat idealistic plans. They are more progressive than what I've seen from any president in recent history. Now, he and the Democrats must try and convince others that is the direction where we need to head. They must convince those with more conservative views, those who are apathetic or too busy to get involved, etc. But then, with every step forward, there are often two steps backwards. Just take a look at the right wing movements that are developing in many European countries! Why is that? There is no perfect society. There are no easy answers as how to make things better.

I would love for you or anyone here to explain exactly how we are going to change things and head in a different direction. I would love for any progressive in Congress to explain exactly how to accomplish anything. Tweeting and criticizing isn't going to change a thing. I've not seen anything that sounds realistic from those who consider themselves the most progressive.

I suppose, from your perspective, if there had been no vocal (and uncompromising) antiwar movement, Nixon would have left Vietnam out of the goodness of his big ol heart? Without Wounded Knee, the courts would have recognized indigenous plenary sovereignty over reservation land just out of charity? Without an environmentalist movement, the EPA would have been created gradually and incremementally just by natural evolution?

You cannot have compromise if one of the compromising parties never meaningfully states its goals in the first place.
 
Yeah. Sure. That worked so well for us who were activist in the 60s and 70s. About the only thing we accomplished was getting the voting age reduced to 18 and ending the draft.

The draft is not ended.

The Selective Service System still exists but there is no military conscription happening. No compulsory draft, though it could be put in place if say, Australia attacked us. :)
Registration is still required by males at the age of 18 (the gender discrimination persists). and it is used to qualify for certain federal programs, loans and grants. There is still a military interface having to do with recruitment.

(Wiki)
The Selective Service System provides the names of all registrants to the Joint Advertising Marketing Research & Studies (JAMRS) program for inclusion in the JAMRS Consolidated Recruitment Database. The names are distributed to the Services for recruiting purposes on a quarterly basis.
 
The Selective Service System still exists but there is no military conscription happening. No compulsory draft, though it could be put in place if say, Australia attacked us. :)
Registration is still required by males at the age of 18 (the gender discrimination persists). and it is used to qualify for certain federal programs, loans and grants. There is still a military interface having to do with recruitment.

(Wiki)
The Selective Service System provides the names of all registrants to the Joint Advertising Marketing Research & Studies (JAMRS) program for inclusion in the JAMRS Consolidated Recruitment Database. The names are distributed to the Services for recruiting purposes on a quarterly basis.

There's no military conscription happening right now, but all the apparatus exists for it to occur. The draft is not ended. The same is true for Australia.
 
The Selective Service System still exists but there is no military conscription happening. No compulsory draft, though it could be put in place if say, Australia attacked us. :)
Registration is still required by males at the age of 18 (the gender discrimination persists). and it is used to qualify for certain federal programs, loans and grants. There is still a military interface having to do with recruitment.

(Wiki)
The Selective Service System provides the names of all registrants to the Joint Advertising Marketing Research & Studies (JAMRS) program for inclusion in the JAMRS Consolidated Recruitment Database. The names are distributed to the Services for recruiting purposes on a quarterly basis.

There's no military conscription happening right now, but all the apparatus exists for it to occur.

Read for comprehension! THAT’S what I said.
The cessation of conscription made a vast difference.
 
I don't think you understand how incremental change happens. It doesn't just occur; the political field must have active, meaningful voices pulling it away from the status quo at all times for incremental changes to accumulate at all.

Yeah. Sure. That worked so well for us who were activist in the 60s and 70s. About the only thing we accomplished was getting the voting age reduced to 18 and ending the draft. In retrospect, I'm not sure either of those things were as positive as we thought. Now that we know that the human brain isn't fully developed until around age 25, is it really a good idea to let 18 year olds vote? I'm not so sure anymore. Ending the draft may not have been such a great idea. When we had the draft, everyone was involved when the country entered a war. This helped shorten wars. When the draft ended, we started having what seems like endless wars. I'm not suggesting we resume the draft, as I've been antiwar my entire life and having my ex drafted when we had a two week old baby was horrific. We have had so many unnecessary wars, especially since we've had an all volunteer army. Humans are prone to war, just like some of our closet ape relatives. So, did our loud voices and activism get us anywhere? I'm not so sure anymore. We are in a much worse position now than we were when I was part of a young, idealistic movement that thought we could change the world. :rolleyes: What I learned is that you can't change human nature. At best you can serve the powerless as an individual, and sometimes you can be a positive influence on others through your own actions. But even that can lead to frustration and burnout.

People do need to get more involved in politics, especially on the local level. People should vote, but almost half of the adults in the country don't even bother to do that. I'm very supportive of organizations like the one that Stacey Abrams started. I've given her some small donations because I think everyone should exercise their right to vote. But, I would love it if we didn't have so much disinformation influencing people in very negative ways. We don't need a lot of protests, although I certainly do support that type of activism. We need people to engage in politics, vote and express what they want. Without that, we won't get far. But, how do we get rid of all the misinformation that constantly circulates these days?

Perhaps our viewpoints aren't as different as you might think. Go and read some of Biden's somewhat idealistic plans. They are more progressive than what I've seen from any president in recent history. Now, he and the Democrats must try and convince others that is the direction where we need to head. They must convince those with more conservative views, those who are apathetic or too busy to get involved, etc. But then, with every step forward, there are often two steps backwards. Just take a look at the right wing movements that are developing in many European countries! Why is that? There is no perfect society. There are no easy answers as how to make things better.

I would love for you or anyone here to explain exactly how we are going to change things and head in a different direction. I would love for any progressive in Congress to explain exactly how to accomplish anything. Tweeting and criticizing isn't going to change a thing. I've not seen anything that sounds realistic from those who consider themselves the most progressive.

I suppose, from your perspective, if there had been no vocal (and uncompromising) antiwar movement, Nixon would have left Vietnam out of the goodness of his big ol heart? Without Wounded Knee, the courts would have recognized indigenous plenary sovereignty over reservation land just out of charity? Without an environmentalist movement, the EPA would have been created gradually and incremementally just by natural evolution?

You cannot have compromise if one of the compromising parties never meaningfully states its goals in the first place.

I disagree with you. It wasn't our activism that ended the war. The Viet Nam War was becoming very unpopular as it dragged on. That's why it ended. People like my parents, who once supported the war, became very disenchanted by what was going on. That's why it ended, imnsho.
 
But, since we've pretty much derailed the original thread, I have something new to add. Maybe the voters should decide more of these issues since the Congress isn't very good at it.

I read an opinion piece this morning that made me realize that even a lot of conservatives want some progressive changes.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/03/opinion/sunday/biden-economy-minimum-wage.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage


Florida once again offered an electoral conundrum this year. Even as the state’s voters filled in the bubble for Donald Trump, they did the same for one of the policies that his opponent, Joe Biden, consistently championed on the campaign trail. They voted by more than 20 percentage points to add an amendment to the Florida Constitution raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour.

A higher wage, in other words, actually got more votes than either presidential candidate.

If you only listened to Republicans or cable news it would seem impossible, but it’s true: Americans, including many conservatives, agree on a number of fundamental progressive economic policies, even if they vehemently disagree on which party should carry them out. This isn’t just obvious in the polling; when these policies are put to voters directly, as many were on Election Day, voters consistently approve them.


Mr. Biden has a number of policies he could decide to champion once he takes office and many crises to resolve. But he would be smart to put the issues voters approved this election season — and which states and cities, our laboratories of democracy, have been experimenting with for years, proving they can actually work — at the top of his list.


Many voters also said yes to higher taxes. In Arizona, a site of the Red for Ed teachers strikes in 2018 that demanded better funding for public education, a ballot measure to raise taxes on the wealthy to hire more teachers and school personnel and raise their pay was a winner. Voters in a few other places — the Portland, Ore. area; St. Louis; and statewide in Colorado — also approved increasing taxes to fund early childhood education.

The article gives several other examples of how voters in red and blue states voted for things that are. usually associated with progressives. While it doesn't mention cannabis, legalization was supported by the voters in a few very conservative states. I think it would probably be made legal if it was left up to the voters in Georgia, but the problem is that those in power won't put things like that on the ballot. I'm beginning to think that despite many conservatives holding very backwards views about things like transgender rights and abortion, there are also a good percentage who support things that help the poor, and the average person. It's the gridlock and obstructionism in Congress that's the real problem. So, any movement must be supported by liberals, moderates and conservatives if there's a chance of making progress. Perhaps it takes an experienced moderate to gain support from people on both ends of the political spectrum.

I think I understand this because I live in a very conservative town, when it comes to national politics. When it comes to local politics, we are quite progressive. For example, when it comes to infrastructure, including our water and sewage systems, renewable energy, walkable downtown and neighborhoods, schools, our abundance of lovely parks, our senior center etc., our local government leaders are very supportive of spending money on such things. We also have a special sales tax that is used for progressive things. It passes almost every time it's on the ballot. Those who vote against it, are just ignorant, imo. They don't really understand that the sales tax goes to things that benefits them as well. So, maybe it's best to become involved in local politics and then try to influence stage and federal politics. It's complicated.
 
Joe Biden and his transition team continue to populate their administration, including for the Vice President and the First Lady.

Biden Picks Susan Rice For White House Domestic Policy Council : Biden Transition Updates : NPR - "Rice is one of many former Obama White House aides who are returning to work in the Biden administration."

Biden introduces Susan Rice, others for key administration posts
During an afternoon event in Wilmington, Del., Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harrispresented Susan Rice as the White House domestic policy adviser; Denis McDonough as the nominee for secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs; Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio, as the nominee for secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development; Tom Vilsack as the nominee for secretary of the Department of Agriculture; and Katherine Tai as the nominee for U.S. trade representative.
I remember Susan Rice from the Obama years.

Who's In Biden's Cabinet? : NPR

Among them are:
  • Chief of Staff for the Vice President: Tina Flournoy
  • Chief Spokesperson for the Vice President: Symone Sanders
  • Chief of Staff for the First Lady: Julissa Reynoso Pantaleon
Seems that both Kamala Harris and Jill Biden will be very busy.

For national security,
  • Secretary of State: Antony Blinken
  • Secretary of Defense: Retired Gen. Lloyd Austin
  • Secretary of Homeland Security: Alejandro Mayorkas
  • Director of National Intelligence: Avril Haines
  • Ambassador to the United Nations: Linda Thomas-Greenfield
  • CIA Director: (unfilled)
The article listed several other unfilled positions: Secretary of Commerce, Chief of Small Business Administration, Attorney General, Secretary of Labor, Secretary of Transportation, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of Energy, Secretary of Education
 
With Rep. Marcia Fudge (OH-11) likely appointed to Pres-elect Biden's Cabinet, the race has started for her successor.

Nina Turner files paperwork for Ohio congressional run | TheHill
She is a former Ohio state senator and a former Bernie Sanders campaign co-chair -- and a great speaker.
Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) expressed confidence this week that Fudge would have a position in Biden’s Cabinet. “It may not be at Agriculture, but she will be nominated to be in the Cabinet,” he said Tuesday.

Should Fudge be confirmed to join the incoming administration, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) would have to schedule a special election in the state to fill her seat representing the 11th District.
John Nichols on Twitter: "Just imagine what U.S. Representative Nina Turner, D-Ohio, could do to advance the cause of economic and social and racial justice, save the planet and end the forever wars. https://t.co/MOyPhhEwpp" / Twitter
then
Cori Bush on Twitter: "If this actually becomes a thing, my amazing sis @ninaturner must run! It would be a dream to work alongside her in Congress. ✨" / Twitter

Nina Turner Files Paperwork To Run For Marcia Fudge's Seat in Congress
Since news spread back in the fall that Rep. Fudge would probably get the nomination, local Dems have been vocal about their interest. In addition to Turner, both Cuyahoga Country Democratic Party Chair Shontel Brown and Cleveland City Councilman Jeff Johnson have announced their bids.

“I’m not shy about telling folks what I intend to do,” Johnson said to the Cleveland Local News. “It’s important to me. This is a position I think I would do very well at. I think I’m the strongest, most experienced candidate in the race when it comes to this.”

Several formers aides from her time working with the Sanders campaign have spoken up, voicing their support for the Ohio politician. “I have encouraged her to run if the seat is open as that is her congressional district and she would have the immediate support of the national Bernie movement,” said Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a fellow former Sanders campaign co-chair, to Politico. “She’d be a fantastic ally for the movement in Congress.”

Nina Turner Preps To Run For Congress In Ohio 11 - "The former Sanders campaign cochair wants to go to Congress. She’ll have to get past Cleveland’s political establishment to get there"
The last time Nina Turner ran for office, she was a Ready for Hillary enthusiast who enjoyed the support of Bill Clinton in her unsuccessful bid for Ohio secretary of state.

Now she’s preparing to be a congressional candidate with the national cred she acquired through her years as one of Bernie Sanders' most prominent allies.
 
As JB's appointments continue, we are starting to see patterns in them.

How Black, Latino And Progressive Democrats Are Forcing Biden To Rethink His Cabinet Picks | FiveThirtyEight
  • Both the Black establishment and the Latino establishment within the Democratic Party have real clout, able to essentially force Biden to pick some Black and Latino appointees for key posts and to block some people they don’t want.
  • The progressive wing of the party doesn’t seem to have enough clout to get its people key jobs, but does have enough power to prevent Biden from picking people they strenuously oppose.
  • And other blocs in the Democratic Party, most notably anti-Trump Republicans or former Republicans who backed Biden, don’t have a lot of clout in the appointment process, at least so far. (We should note that this article refers often to stories first broken by The American Prospect and Politico in particular, as both outlets have done stellar reporting on Biden’s transition process.)
...
In fact, you could argue that many selection processes in America, in and outside of politics, are and have always been racialized but this is not acknowledged because picking white people is considered normal and disconnected from racial considerations.
 
Ocasio-Cortez: Biden agenda 'a little hazy' | TheHill
The New York progressive told reporters at the Capitol that Biden’s incoming Cabinet needs “a more cohesive vision.”

“You have an individual appointment here, an individual appointment there,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “We can wrestle about whether they are bold enough or ambitious enough, especially given the uncertainty and what kind of Senate we’re going to have.”

“But aside from that, I think one of the things I’m looking for, when I see all of these picks put together is: What is the agenda? What is this overall vision going to be? And to me, I think that’s a little hazy,” she added.
AOC can't see much of a pattern.
Ocasio-Cortez told the reporters that she’s trying to understand “the overall message” from Biden’s team “in this entire Cabinet put together.”

“We have a person who has a more conservative history, that’s one thing, but what is the mission that they are being given in their individual agency, whether it’s Transportation, Defense, OMB [Office of Management and Budget], etc.?” she asked. “What is the mandate here?”

“I just think that’s something that we’re looking to see is — it’s something that I hope will be pushed,” she added.
 
Biden’s Cabinet picks give Kamala an edge in 2024 - POLITICO - "Biden has opted for seasoned technocrats over ambitious pols for key jobs, denying potential political rivals to Harris a political springboard."

It may be that KH herself is involved, trying to be sure that she does not have much future competition in the Cabinet.
Joe Biden hasn’t picked any of the nearly two dozen Democrats who ran against him to serve in his administration — and that bodes quite well for the former rival he did elevate as his No. 2, Kamala Harris.

Biden’s decision to forgo a Cabinet of ambitious pols in favor of a group heavy on seasoned loyalists and technocrats contrasts with Donald Trump and Barack Obama's appointment of next-generation officials to top posts. And it could deny a springboard to potential Harris competitors in 2024 if Biden decides to retire after one term rather than running for reelection in his 80s.

...
“He’s not putting together a team of rivals, he’s putting together a team. That sets him apart from everybody,” said Mary Anne Marsh, a Democratic strategist from Massachusetts who served in senior roles for John Kerry, Biden’s incoming special envoy on climate change. “Obama had a team of rivals, other presidents have had a team of rivals. He’s not interested in conflict as much as he wants to have people who have done the job before and they can all work together to get all the work done.

“That,” Marsh added, “benefits Kamala Harris.”
Does KH expect much competition?

I looked at the stats for recent Vice Presidents, and I find that they may win even if they don't win very big in the primaries.
 
Scoop: Mayor Pete may get China post - Axios
President-elect Joe Biden is considering a high-profile ambassadorship for Pete Buttigieg, possibly sending him to China, people familiar with the matter tell Axios.

...
Behind the scenes: Biden passed over Buttigieg, an Afghan war vet, to be his ambassador to the United Nations, the job said to be Buttigieg's top choice.

...
Between the lines: Some of Buttigieg’s backers see a political upside to a domestic Cabinet role in which he can build his relationship with Black voters, who largely rejected his candidacy.
It may be hard to find a good speaker of Chinese who has not grown up with the language, however. Foreign Language Training - United States Department of State lists languages by difficulty.
  • (mostly 24 weeks) Danish, Dutch, French (30 weeks), Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish, Swedish
  • (36 weeks) German, Haitian Creole, Indonesian, Malay, Swahili
  • (44 weeks) most languages
  • (88 weeks) Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean
For Arabic, one has to learn Modern Standard Arabic and a local dialect, while Chinese, Japanese, and Korean have Chinese characters.

PB is known to speak English, Norwegian, Spanish, French, Italian, Maltese, Arabic, and Dari with varying degrees of fluency.
  • 0 (native) English
  • I Italian, Norwegian, Spanish
  • I-II French
  • III Maltese, Dari
  • IV Arabic
So he might be able to learn some Chinese for that job.
 
Here's what some of the Left thinks of some of Joe Biden's appointees.

Biden Picks Raytheon Board Member To Lead The Pentagon
The mass media are reporting that the Biden camp has selected former general Lloyd J. Austin III to be the next secretary of defense, assuaging fears among antiwar activists that the position would go to bloodthirsty psychopath Michele Flournoy as commonly predicted.

As has become the standard ritual for Biden’s cabinet picks, the mass media are holding a parade to celebrate the fact that Austin would be the first Black chief of the US war machine while virtually ignoring the murderous agendas he has facilitated throughout his career. As head of Central Command Austin actively campaigned to resurrect the Pentagon’s spectacularly failed program of trying to arm “rebels” in Syria to fight ISIS, and in 2014 he backed immunity for US troops from war crimes prosecutions by the government of Afghanistan. He helped spearhead the Iraq invasion, and he is a member of the same private equity fund which invests in defense contractors as Flournoy and Biden’s warmongering pick for Secretary of State Tony Blinken.

Austin is also a member of the board of directors for the war profiteering corporation Raytheon, where he went immediately after his military career. Raytheon spends millions of dollars a year actively lobbying the US government to advance policies which are beneficial to the multibillion-dollar arms manufacturing giant, which of course means lobbying for military expansionism and interventionism. The previous Secretary of Defense Mark Esper also worked for Raytheon, working for years as one of the top corporate lobbyists in DC under the position “Vice President for Government Relations“.
Raytheon is a big military contractor, and a big military budget means lots of business for that company.
 
Chris Hedges: The Collective Suicide Of The Liberal Class
he Democratic Party elites revel in taunting liberals as well as the left-wing populists who preach class warfare and supported Bernie Sanders. How are we supposed to interpret the appointment of Antony Blinken, one of the architects of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and supporter of the apartheid state of Israel, as Secretary of State? Or John Kerry, who championed the massive expansion of domestic oil and gas production, largely through fracking, and, according to Barack Obama’s memoir, worked doggedly to convince those concerned about the climate crisis to “offer up concessions on subsidies for the nuclear power industry and the opening of additional U.S. coastlines to offshore oil drilling” as the new climate policy czar? Or Brian Deese, the executive who was in charge of the “climate portfolio” at BlackRock, which invests heavily in fossil fuels, including coal, and who served as a former Obama economic adviser who advocated austerity measures, to run the White House’s economic policy? Or Neera Tanden, for director of the Office of Management and Budget, who as president of the Center for American Progress raised millions in dark money from Silicon Valley and Wall Street while relentlessly ridiculing Bernie Sanders and his supporters on cable news and social media and who proposed a plank in the Democratic platform calling for bombing Iran?
Then comparing Joe Biden's admin to the last days of the Weimar Republic before Adolf Hitler's takeover.
 
It's not inappropriate. The "middle left" does not seem to realize that they are as much on the target list as the "radicals" they declaim.
 
Looks like Pete got a new job. Welcome boss.


WASHINGTON (AP) — President-elect Joe Biden is expected to pick former South Bend, Indiana, mayor Pete Buttigieg to head the Transportation Department, according to three people familiar with the plans.

LGBTQ rights groups immediately spoke out in praise of Biden’s selection of Buttigieg.

“Pete’s nomination is a new milestone in a decades-long effort to ensure LGBTQ people are represented throughout our government – and its impact will reverberate well-beyond the department he will lead,” said Annise Parker, president and CEO of the LGBTQ Victory Institute. “It distances our nation from a troubled legacy of barring out LGBTQ people from government positions and moves us closer to the President-elect’s vision of a government that reflects America.”

Biden has pledged to spend billions making major infrastructure improvements and on retrofitting initiatives that can help the U.S. battle climate change. He also wants to immediately mandate mask-wearing on airplanes and public transportation systems to slow the spread of the coronavirus.

Despite having governed a city of barely 100,000, Buttigieg was credited with transforming traffic with his Smart Streets initiative, a three-year project to convert 8 miles (12.9 kilometers) of multilane thoroughfares into two-way routes that enhanced South Bend’s downtown. The project received awards for environmental protection.

Though on a far smaller scale than the nation’s transportation systems, the project, as well as Buttigieg’s initiative to convert the city’s sewers to a smart-flow system, demonstrate what supporters praised as Buttigieg’s next-generation infrastructure vision.
 
What do you consider "loonie left"?

For a start, those complaining about Biden’s initial choices. See your own link.

Sure, because some are not on board with some cabinet picks, it's the left that has a loony problem.

Meanwhile,

[TWEET]https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1339730530661789696`[/TWEET]

And he's far from alone.
 
What do you consider "loonie left"?

For a start, those complaining about Biden’s initial choices. See your own link.

Sure, because some are not on board with some cabinet picks, it's the left that has a loony problem.

Well, right wing authoritarians shit their pants when *one* blogger wrote a piece about how Santa should be black. How would they distinguish between one, or a few, or a lot of people doing something?

Side note: I peed my pants laughing at Megyn Kelly devoting a whole show to the Black Santa Menace. First laughing that she cared about it enough to talk about it on her show, then really laughed when she had a PANEL OF EXPERTS on to help her get her outrage on. :rofl:

Then, then, when she looked at the camera to speak to all the little racist right wing children out there who might be traumatized by something something black Santa to reassure them that Santa is indeed ARYAN AS FUCK, I fucking lost it. I peed my pants a little.

I also predicted she'd come on the next day or so after getting rightfully ridiculed across media and pretend it was "a joke." :rofl:
 
Back
Top Bottom