• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Yoga guy=antifascist=44 months in Federal prison

none

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
3,331
Location
outside
Basic Beliefs
atheist/ignostic
Make up your own thread title.
I don't care, before you do read this

https://theintercept.com/2021/10/16/daniel-baker-anarchist-capitol-riot/
...
Baker, a 34-year-old yoga teacher and emergency medical technician trainee, had no previous criminal convictions and has already been held for 10 months of harsh pretrial detention, including seven months in solitary confinement. He never brought a weapon near a government building; he amassed no armed anti-fascist forces; he made no threats on a single individual.
...
The threat of kidnapping charge stemmed from a feverish public Facebook post in which Baker put out a general call for anti-racists and anti-fascists to encircle the state Capitol, should far-right groups attack it “on or around inauguration day,” and “trap” right-wingers inside with cops. In the very next sentence, though, he wrote, “we will drive them out of Tallahassee with every caliber available!” The right wing militiae were thus to be trapped in and driven out at once, on an unspecified day, by an unnamed collaboration of counterprotesters.
...
Other social media posts that prosecutors pointed to as evidence at trial included memes featuring Homer Simpson, Baby Yoda, and a picture of a kangaroo. “It was truly a surreal experience being in a literal kangaroo court,” Baker told me. His prosecution, conviction, and sentencing exemplify the government’s commitment to conjuring a left-wing extremist threat when none is there.
...
 
What drove his arrest in the first place? I know the 1/6'ers had their social media postings scoured because of 1/6. What did this guy do that prompted attention from the FBI?

In general, people like this are then instigated by the FBI to try to commit a crime, like blow up a bridge. They went straight to arrest and conviction with him.
 
What drove his arrest in the first place? I know the 1/6'ers had their social media postings scoured because of 1/6. What did this guy do that prompted attention from the FBI?

In general, people like this are then instigated by the FBI to try to commit a crime, like blow up a bridge. They went straight to arrest and conviction with him.
Politics.
 
What drove his arrest in the first place? I know the 1/6'ers had their social media postings scoured because of 1/6. What did this guy do that prompted attention from the FBI?

In general, people like this are then instigated by the FBI to try to commit a crime, like blow up a bridge. They went straight to arrest and conviction with him.
Politics.

No, the charge was for the transmission of a message over the internet calling for the kidnapping and murder of insurrectionists on 1/6.

The point of the article is to describe the irony that someone who was calling for the violent prevention of an insurrection is getting harsher treatment than those that actually attempted a violent insurrection... and goes on to imply corruption in the conservative penal system in Florida is behind that.
 
What drove his arrest in the first place? I know the 1/6'ers had their social media postings scoured because of 1/6. What did this guy do that prompted attention from the FBI?

In general, people like this are then instigated by the FBI to try to commit a crime, like blow up a bridge. They went straight to arrest and conviction with him.
Politics.

No, the charge was for the transmission of a message over the internet calling for the kidnapping and murder of insurrectionists on 1/6.

The point of the article is to describe the irony that someone who was calling for the violent prevention of an insurrection is getting harsher treatment than those that actually attempted a violent insurrection... and goes on to imply corruption in the conservative penal system in Florida is behind that.

How many of the J6’ers have been charged with insurrection / sedition? None. The DOJ already conceded there’s no evidence of a conspiracy to riot at the capitol. None were armed. Video shows the cops waiving them in. This guy openly advocated for armed conflict and attacking supposed protesters on inauguration day.
 
No, the charge was for the transmission of a message over the internet calling for the kidnapping and murder of insurrectionists on 1/6.

The point of the article is to describe the irony that someone who was calling for the violent prevention of an insurrection is getting harsher treatment than those that actually attempted a violent insurrection... and goes on to imply corruption in the conservative penal system in Florida is behind that.

How many of the J6’ers have been charged with insurrection / sedition? None. The DOJ already conceded there’s no evidence of a conspiracy to riot at the capitol. None were armed. Video shows the cops waiving them in. This guy openly advocated for armed conflict and attacking supposed protesters on inauguration day.

Yes, some of them were armed and over 600 have been arrested so far.

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/03/capitol-protesters-were-armed-with-variety-of-weapons/

Conservative social media posts misleadingly claim the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 was not an “armed” insurrection, citing FBI testimony that no guns were seized from suspects that day. But 23 people have been charged with having deadly or dangerous weapons during the assault — including a loaded handgun found on a man arrested on Capitol grounds.

It's easy to find all kinds of accurate information about those who have been arrested and charged with a variety of crimes for their involvement in the Jan 6th insurrection attempt.

Of course, there are laws against threatening people. In Georgia, the law states that it's illegal to make a "terroristic threat". So, nobody can safely threaten others, without the possibility of being charged with a crime, even if they weren't serious. I assume that is why the person mentioned in the OP was arrested. I don't know any other details, so I'll leave it at that.

Here's more.

Social media posts latched on to the answer to misleadingly purport that the protesters were not armed.

One meme, showing a photo of protesters inside the Capitol, falsely claimed: “Senate testimony this week confirms that no Capitol protesters were armed and not a single weapon was found. Clearly NOT insurrection, NOT an attempt to overthrow the government, just out of control protestors that saw inadequate security and ran thru the building.”

An article on the conservative website Gateway Pundit — which was cited on the website of conservative commentator David Harris Jr. — carried the headline: “Another Democrat-Media Narrative Goes Up in Flames: FBI Official Admits No Firearms Were Confiscated by Law Enforcement at Capitol Riot.”

But a wide array of lethal weapons — including a firearm — were found on protesters at the Capitol.

You really need to be careful where you get your information from, or should I say your misinformation!
 
Huh. The actual charges present rather a different picture than "yoga guy". I think I'm going to reserve judgement on this.
 
Huh. The actual charges present rather a different picture than "yoga guy". I think I'm going to reserve judgement on this.
Did you see the art he has been accused of using to ________.?
hmm.. better turn this over to the judge.
 
The Intercept is a left wing rag and this article is bullshit.
We have a guy who posts threats of violence and has the means to make good on those threats given him owning rifles and having military training and combat experience (fighting in Syria but not as part of US military).

The author seems to think that just because Baker is a leftist, that he should get a pass for his behavior. That is similar to the activists who believe that domestic terrorists like Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman should not have been prosecuted.
 
The author seems to think that just because Baker is a leftist, that he should get a pass for his behavior.
Quote where the author implies Baker should get a pass... the author indicates he got overly severe treatment. Where does he say he should have gotten no punishment whatsoever (a "pass")?
That is similar to the activists who believe that domestic terrorists like Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman should not have been prosecuted.
I don't know whataboutis this unrelated tale. If you want to call hypocrisy you should start with an accurate representation of what IS claimed versus what IS NOT claimed, as a very first start.
 
Quote where the author implies Baker should get a pass...
Natasha Lennard said:
This should have been a straightforward First Amendment case, with Baker’s online speech, albeit bellicose, judged as constitutionally protected. Instead, the formerly unhoused veteran has been made a victim of government efforts to draw false equivalences between fascistic far-right forces and the anti-fascists who would see them opposed.

the author indicates he got overly severe treatment. Where does he say he should have gotten no punishment whatsoever (a "pass")?
She definitely did say that, as is evident from that quote.

I don't know whataboutis this unrelated tale.
Not unrelated. All three have been part of the same left-wing insurrection.
 
fine, pull the plug... disconnect...see 'ya. reinvent the wheel while you're at it.
 
Back
Top Bottom