Recent content by KeepTalking

You are entirely incorrect here. You can disagree with those claims, we have been doing so for more than 500 posts. Deliberately misgendering other members is not necessary to make an argument supporting or countering those claims, and that is what will run afoul of the TOU.

Coheed and Cambria - "Welcome Home" Claudio Sanchez was going through a bit of a rough patch in his relationship when he wrote this one, and it is a prog metal masterpiece to boot: You could have been all I wanted But you weren't honest Now get in the ground

See January 6th.

I have a quote prediction from a future conservative post in a thread regarding the next mass shooting at a protest/rally/riot/whatever: "Why are you guys bringing up Rittenhouse?"

Quite to the contrary, several definitions have been provided. Many words have multiple definitions, thumb through a dictionary some time, you will find several. This is generally not a barrier to understanding what people mean when they use those words. Context will often be your guide. No...

I am not ignoring the concerns of women, I am merely pointing out that the two situations are not the same and the analogy fails because of it. I am trying to listen to the concerns of everyone involved, and I think there are solutions to many of the concerns expressed by both women and...

Well, it's a good thing I did not say he did. I was very clearly responding to our resident Sage, who was advocating for exactly that. I am not a communist, nor am I an Antifa, therefor you can take it as granted that I do not find everyone to the right of Trotsky to be a fascist.

Well, I mean, just judging by this OP and every other OP he has posted, the obvious answer seems to be: Those paragons of truth and justice, conservative YouTube commentators.

The distinction I think that is missing from the above is that those laws only apply to those who have been convicted of a particular crime, showing that they should not be trusted in those areas, rather than applying to everyone whether they have earned the mistrust or not.

It isn't the sentence structure that is offensive, but rather the meaning that it conveys.

Yes, he is. Alive and threatening to primary DeSantis because he has not prostrated himself in front of Trump to a sufficient degree.

It also does not include the right to be hunted down and killed by AR toting idiots who think they are fucking patriots, but are in reality fascists.

None of that tells me why you felt it necessary to add ", but" after "Nobody should be physically attacked". One usually only does so to point out some mitigating circumstance, and I don't think that your "but" should be considered a mitigating circumstance to being physically attacked.

Why did you find it necessary to add a "but" there? It is as if you are in some way trying to excuse that behavior.

No, real patriots understand that there is nothing more patriotic than the right to protest. Fake patriots wave their ARs around like dicks, and go to protests to shoot people. Talk about your "ferals", those you would label "patriots" are the most in need of domestication.