• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Rape victim ordered to pay her abuser child support

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, look. There is a report of the Judge taking a step back.


And holy shit, the rest of the alligations in the article.
Cliffsnotes?
The daughter's claim of sexual abuse appear credible since they are backed by a medical examination performed in New Orleans.
 
You do know that it has been roughly 5840 days since the bar. Do you mean to tell me that you know what both of these people have been doing for 5840 days? Oh let me guess, one day in the life of people overshadows 5840 days. Cool story bro.
You know it's been almost 2000 years since Jesus's Resurrection?

Do you mean to tell me that you know what His Apostles were doing and saying, 16 years later?

It's a cool story and all. But.....
Tom

Granted they've been dead for most of that 2000 years didn't they all write a manifesto? :rolleyes: I'd consider that more info than a day at the bar.
 
You do know that it has been roughly 5840 days since the bar. Do you mean to tell me that you know what both of these people have been doing for 5840 days? Oh let me guess, one day in the life of people overshadows 5840 days. Cool story bro.
You know it's been almost 2000 years since Jesus's Resurrection?

Do you mean to tell me that you know what His Apostles were doing and saying, 16 years later?

It's a cool story and all. But.....
Tom
Of all the pointless shit you post, this is really up there. Congrats.

I guess you know you haven't got a cogent argument so you're going to throw out some theology.
 
What a disgusting thing to write. She was -6. He was 30.
Negative six? That would be indeed inappropriate. Not to mention physically impossible. :)

But I assume you meant to write 16 ...
That alone is enough that it was rape.
Not true. Even in states with ages of consent higher than 16 (like LA) there is a difference between "carnal knowledge of a juvenile with consent" and actual rape.
Obviously I meant 16.

If she was -6 she would have more rights, as a “potential human”.
 
What a disgusting thing to write. She was -6. He was 30.
Negative six? That would be indeed inappropriate. Not to mention physically impossible. :)

But I assume you meant to write 16 ...
That alone is enough that it was rape.
Not true. Even in states with ages of consent higher than 16 (like LA) there is a difference between "carnal knowledge of a juvenile with consent" and actual rape.
Obviously I meant 16.

If she was -6 she would have more rights, as a “potential human”.
Sadly, true.
 
So now we learn that there is a medical examination confirming that the daughter was raped.

I always wonder, at moments like this, whether people who previously gave excuses for the scumbag will
  1. Continue to do so
  2. Decide this is bad for the daughter, but continue to think they were justified and did no harm in previously accusing the mother of lying
  3. Have a wholly new outlook on the matter, as if their first reaction never happened

    Or

  4. Actually reflect on their first reaction and decide it was regrettable.
 
So now we learn that there is a medical examination confirming that the daughter was raped.

I always wonder, at moments like this, whether people who previously gave excuses for the scumbag will
  1. Continue to do so
  2. Decide this is bad for the daughter, but continue to think they were justified and did no harm in previously accusing the mother of lying
  3. Have a wholly new outlook on the matter, as if their first reaction never happened

    Or

  4. Actually reflect on their first reaction and decide it was regrettable.
You know where my money is...

None of the above. They're going to ghost the thread, and then 1, but about someone else.
 
From Gospel's link:
However that complaint went untouched for seven years until the story garnered international attention last week.

"What I want the public to know is in 2015, we dropped the ball," Sheriff Daniel Edwards told WBRZ. "It was an accident and not some conspiracy. I feel bad for Crysta that happened. But, I want the public to know this was not a willful continuing failure."

In January 2021, the child's school counselor notified the Department of Children and Family Services that the girl alleged Barnes physically and mentally abused her. In February 2022, court documents noted for the first time that their daughter was conceived by rape, and it was alleged that Barnes drugged and sexually assaulted his daughter.

“She was transported to New Orleans where she was evaluated and the doctor confirmed that there was evidence of forced entry congruent with sexual assault,” the document read.
 
“She was transported to New Orleans where she was evaluated and the doctor confirmed that there was evidence of forced entry congruent with sexual assault,” the document read.
Makes me wonder how many other women/girls he's done this to.
 
So now we learn that there is a medical examination confirming that the daughter was raped.

I always wonder, at moments like this, whether people who previously gave excuses for the scumbag will
  1. Continue to do so
  2. Decide this is bad for the daughter, but continue to think they were justified and did no harm in previously accusing the mother of lying
  3. Have a wholly new outlook on the matter, as if their first reaction never happened

    Or

  4. Actually reflect on their first reaction and decide it was regrettable.
5. They're going to try to stick it back in the closet where it got put long ago.
 
The public was infuriated after a judge made a woman pay child support to her alleged rapist. Now the judge has reversed his decision according to the latest update in the case reported by WBRZ.

The judge dealing with a paternity and custody case involving the child of Crysta Abelseth and John Barnes reversed his earlier decision to give Barnes temporary custody of the child and make Abelseth pay child support payments.
Another trial date to establish custody is slated to happen on Wednesday, July 15.
 
The public was infuriated after a judge made a woman pay child support to her alleged rapist. Now the judge has reversed his decision according to the latest update in the case reported by WBRZ.

The judge dealing with a paternity and custody case involving the child of Crysta Abelseth and John Barnes reversed his earlier decision to give Barnes temporary custody of the child and make Abelseth pay child support payments.
Another trial date to establish custody is slated to happen on Wednesday, July 15.
(y) Would be nice if it worked both ways, though.

When Male Rape Victims Are Accountable for Child Support
 
The public was infuriated after a judge made a woman pay child support to her alleged rapist. Now the judge has reversed his decision according to the latest update in the case reported by WBRZ.

The judge dealing with a paternity and custody case involving the child of Crysta Abelseth and John Barnes reversed his earlier decision to give Barnes temporary custody of the child and make Abelseth pay child support payments.
Another trial date to establish custody is slated to happen on Wednesday, July 15.
(y) Would be nice if it worked both ways, though.

When Male Rape Victims Are Accountable for Child Support
Always important to have someone come in with the '...but whaddabut the men?'

Also, it "currently" didn't work this way for the woman. She has been sharing custody with her rapist for over a decade now.
 
The public was infuriated after a judge made a woman pay child support to her alleged rapist. Now the judge has reversed his decision according to the latest update in the case reported by WBRZ.

The judge dealing with a paternity and custody case involving the child of Crysta Abelseth and John Barnes reversed his earlier decision to give Barnes temporary custody of the child and make Abelseth pay child support payments.
Another trial date to establish custody is slated to happen on Wednesday, July 15.
(y) Would be nice if it worked both ways, though.

When Male Rape Victims Are Accountable for Child Support
Always important to have someone come in with the '...but whaddabut the men?'

Also, it "currently" didn't work this way for the woman. She has been sharing custody with her rapist for over a decade now.
Yeah, you're right. Nevermind about the men.
 
Clearly there are multiple injustices in this case. But if this woman now owes child support doesn't this guy owe lots of back child support?
I agree.

Furthermore, could it also be allowed this guy being guilty of the statutory rape... yet still be awarded custody since the child actually wants to live with him? Aren't the views of the child always supposed to be above everything else on the judgement?

Assuming the aforementioned, current child support from the woman does not seem so incredible anymore.
 
What proof have you found that she lied bout her age?
I did not say she in particular did (although she might have - no way to know 16 years later one way or the other).
I was talking generally that this is an aspect of these laws that I find particularly egregious - they do not allow the other party lying about her age as a defense.
I have it on good authority that while young men may not be able to tell if a girl is under age by looking at her, they are pretty easily able to tell if they talk to her.
Because a 16 year old acts so much dumber than an 18 year old?
 
What proof have you found that she lied bout her age?
I did not say she in particular did (although she might have - no way to know 16 years later one way or the other).
I was talking generally that this is an aspect of these laws that I find particularly egregious - they do not allow the other party lying about her age as a defense.
I have it on good authority that while young men may not be able to tell if a girl is under age by looking at her, they are pretty easily able to tell if they talk to her.
Because a 16 year old acts so much dumber than an 18 year old?
Wow. Just when I thought (certain) men couldn’t be any biggest assholes, I’m proven wrong, all over again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom