• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Split City Vs Country Politics

To notify a split thread.
It also does nothing to help heal the tremendous divides in our country right now. You don’t win hearts or minds by ridicule, contempt or disdain
At this point, I do not see healing that divide as a plausible future, or even a desirable one if the price is further cession of our core democratic institutions and the civil rights they guarantee. Let there be no mollification without representation.
That’s really a shame. Believe it or not. Rural and urban dwellers share far more values in common than not. I believe that it is absolutely essential that everyone reach out and find common ground.

So much of the divide comes from fear, ignorance and lack of understanding. This flows both ways. I see it obviously in this discussion

I’m about to type something that I know many/most/everyone else will see as untrue and inflammatory. I’m not trying to upset people but rather to nudge people to examine their own attitudes and beliefs —and exactly where those attitudes and beliefs come from.

I’ve been very frank that I grew up in a rural area and that I had very numerous…disagreements with my father over most political issues, especially over race. Those arguments did not abate until the last few months of his life, during which time my mother died and Dad was diagnosed with a second fatal medical condition and died soon after. As you can imagine, politics were of little importance during that time. But years before that, even during the height of my …fierce and sometimes verbally explosive disagreements, even when I was a pretty typical teenager—I knew my father and I shared most of the same values and beliefs. The same values and beliefs I am willing to bet most of you largely share. Two things were key: my parents, more explicitly my father, wanted all of their kids to do better than they had—in terms of educational achievement and socioeconomic success, yes, but also not to be burdened by their shortcomings or the harsh judgements they faced growing up poor, each with a parent who was seriously ill and dying and ultimately died while they were young children, left to largely raise themselves by single parents who worked back breaking work to feed and house their family, with little time left for tender mercies. They felt the judgement of others who were a little better off and family as well who mostly did little or nothing to help.

In our country, just as in Dickens’ England, the poor are looked down on, resented, ridiculed and blamed for their circumstances and very often hamstrung by society. Recently, in the US, there have been changes—to some extent. Perhaps millennials and Gen Z and those who come after will do a better job of ensuring the promise that we are all equal under the constitution. I hope so. But it’s incremental real work. The younger among you will not realize just how much better life is for most people compared with the time the boomers grew up. We boomers knew our lives were many many times easier than our parents’ had. We want better for the younger generations. We’d prefer not to be hated and we wish you understood that Mayberry and Happy Days are pretty myths just as Shirley Temple and Our Gang were fairy tales about our parents’ childhoods.

I’m sorry—I’m rambling here and I don’t mean to.

People often fear what is unfamiliar or what they don’t understand. That fear is often translated into different kinds of hatred, including bigotry and prejudice.

Those of us who see ourselves as liberal mostly like to believe that we don’t have any bigotries: We accept people of all gender identities and sexual orientations, all races, all nationalities, all religions with usually a preference for no religious ideology. We fight for what we see as social justice, oppose unnecessary authority over private lives and decisions and oppose authoritarianism of all kinds. At least we aspire to all of this, even if we know sometimes we fall short.

But some prejudices are still ok-necessary even. And that includes conservatives, conservative thought, and conservative political beliefs and expression. We attach those beliefs to people who look a certain way, dress a certain way, have different religious beliefs than our own—and who maybe come from places we don’t know much about or want to or see any reason to care about,

From where I sit, that’s not different than the bigotries and prejudices of Archie Bunker. The target/object of fear and am distrust and anger is different but it’s not actually based on anything remotely resembling any actual familiarity or attempt to know or understand why some people feel differently than we do. It’s ignorance and fear and hatred, as surely as is racism and homophobia is ignorance and fear and hatred.

Ignorance is very useful if it inspires a desire to learn more.

It’s a very useful weapon if it is used to manipulate and inspire fear and resentment rather than curiosity and seeking to understand.

Fear is useful in helping us identify and escape danger. And it’s useful to manipulate and inflame emotions which overrides thought.

Hatred-I think that’s only useful as a tool to be used by those who wish to control others.

I grew up in a small town surrounded by farmland. I grew up hearing that people in big cities were dangerous, not friendly, wanted to take advantage of ignorant country folks. They were not to be trusted. Further more, they thought themselves superior to rural people and yet lacked basic common sense and practical everyday life skills.

As an adult I lived in two very different major metropolitan areas, and went into the city every day for work or school. I’ve traveled to other cities as well and learned in each one how to get around in the city, how to navigate public transport, when to cross the street regardless of what the signal says and when not to, how to avoid panhandlers, ask and give directions and ge real life skills in the city. And I took advantage of all the free stuff those cities had to offer as much as I could.

And then, we moved back to the Midwest, small town, surrounded by farmland and forests and prairies and wildlife. To a place so small that my husband, in fact, had never even attended it taught at a university with a student body that did not well exceed the total population of the town where we now lived.

This past spring, I went with an old friend to do a nostalgia tour of our home town and schools ( including university campus and the first apartment we shared). A lot has changed. Our small town is now diverse. My county now has at least one Sikh temple, a bunch of fulfillment centers and my old school, so white that the couple of kids with NA ancestry kept that a deep dark secret, has a student population 2.5 times the size it was when I graduated and a 40% minority student population. Students graduating aspire to Ivy League schools. When we attended, we were not allowed to take two foreign languages because that might be ‘too hard.’ Girls were not allowed to take shop or drafting classes. Boys could not take home ec classes.

The county has changed. The county where I live has changed as well. There is greater diversity and greater acceptance of non-descendants of wester European nations.

There is still within my town a strong desire to keep poor those who are poor, there is a strong desire by a powerful elite to undermine public education.

I live in a blue state.
 
It also does nothing to help heal the tremendous divides in our country right now. You don’t win hearts or minds by ridicule, contempt or disdain
At this point, I do not see healing that divide as a plausible future, or even a desirable one if the price is further cession of our core democratic institutions and the civil rights they guarantee. Let there be no mollification without representation.
That’s really a shame. Believe it or not. Rural and urban dwellers share far more values in common than not. I believe that it is absolutely essential that everyone reach out and find common ground.
Intellectually I'd agree, both groups have basically the same in most respects. But, the fact still remains that "city people" aren't voting in Republicans who are trying to impose a religious theocracy.
Look at any county voting demographics and you see a really consistent pattern: big cities vote Democrat, small towns vote Republican - the there seems to be a strong (though not absolute) correlation between the more remote the county the more batshit insane the Republican.

The problem isn't a lack of shared values, the problem isn't divisiveness or perception, the problem isn't that city people are snooty or country people are inbred.
The problem is that when it comes to larger scale systemic political issues urban people see a problem and then try to come up with a way within the bounds of the rules of our society to to fix it, and rural people see the same problem and then go out to chain women to a radiator in the kitchen and whip up a posse to lynch some niggers.
(At least, this is what both Toni and Jaryhn have said happens, and I'm taking them at their word)

This whole "our problem is the gap in our shard experience" thing is a bunch of nonsense, the real fundamental issue is the vast difference in how the two groups approach solving problems.
 
It also does nothing to help heal the tremendous divides in our country right now. You don’t win hearts or minds by ridicule, contempt or disdain
At this point, I do not see healing that divide as a plausible future, or even a desirable one if the price is further cession of our core democratic institutions and the civil rights they guarantee. Let there be no mollification without representation.
That’s really a shame. Believe it or not. Rural and urban dwellers share far more values in common than not. I believe that it is absolutely essential that everyone reach out and find common ground.
Intellectually I'd agree, both groups have basically the same in most respects. But, the fact still remains that "city people" aren't voting in Republicans who are trying to impose a religious theocracy.
Look at any county voting demographics and you see a really consistent pattern: big cities vote Democrat, small towns vote Republican - the there seems to be a strong (though not absolute) correlation between the more remote the county the more batshit insane the Republican.

The problem isn't a lack of shared values, the problem isn't divisiveness or perception, the problem isn't that city people are snooty or country people are inbred.
The problem is that when it comes to larger scale systemic political issues urban people see a problem and then try to come up with a way within the bounds of the rules of our society to to fix it, and rural people see the same problem and then go out to chain women to a radiator in the kitchen and whip up a posse to lynch some niggers.
(At least, this is what both Toni and Jaryhn have said happens, and I'm taking them at their word)

This whole "our problem is the gap in our shard experience" thing is a bunch of nonsense, the real fundamental issue is the vast difference in how the two groups approach solving problems.
Mathematically speaking, a significant portion of city people ARE voting Republican since only 14 percent of the US population is living in rural areas. And I know for an absolute fact, a bunch of them vote Democrat.

I disagree with you that city people necessarily see a problem and try to fix it and rural people see the same problem and chain women to a radiator in the kitchen and go out lynching. After all, George Floyd and too many other black men have died on CITY streets at the hands of police. Ariel Castro literally had girls chained up in his house in Cleveland which is a city. Racists live in cities and suburbs and in rural areas and so do the fiercest social justice warriors.

I do think that the problem is that each side thinks they understand things better and that the other is only looking out for their own interests. And I think that is largely true. Here's an article that I linked in another thread that I think nicely illustrates the point:


More than half of the world’s lithium resources lies beneath the salt flats in the Andean regions of Argentina, Bolivia and Chile, where indigenous quinoa farmers and llama herders must now compete with miners for water in one of the world’s driest regions.

Lithium mining requires huge amounts of groundwater to pump out brines from drilled wells, and some estimates show that almost 2 million litres of water are needed to produce one ton of lithium.

In Chile’s Salar de Atacama, lithium and other mining activities consumed 65% of the water, causing groundwater depletion, soil contamination and other forms of environmental degradation, forcing local communities to abandon ancestral settlements.

“As demand for lithium increases and production is tapped from deeper rock mines and brines, the challenges of mitigating environmental risk will increase,” the report says.

Artisanal mines in the Congo​

Nearly 50% of world cobalt reserves are in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which accounts for over two-thirds of global production of the mineral.

About 20% of cobalt sourced from the central African nation comes from artisanal mines, where some 40,000 children work in extremely dangerous conditions, according to UNICEF, the UN’s children's agency.

The dust from excavation may contain toxic metals including uranium that are linked to health problems such as respiration diseases and birth defects.

The environmental risks are just as worrying. Cobalt mine sites may contain sulphur minerals that can generate sulfuric acid when exposed to air and water. This process, known as acid mine drainage, can devastate rivers, streams and aquatic life for hundreds of years.

The environmental impacts of graphite mining are similar. The use of explosives can blow dust and fine particles into the atmosphere, causing health problems in nearby communities and contaminating soils around the site.

About 80% of natural graphite reserves are in Brazil, China and Turkey.
Not just POV but also needs are sometimes in opposition to one another. I see this with regards to fracking. It isn't just the areas where fracking itself is being carried out that are at risk for serious environmental damage but also the areas where sand is mined and carted hundreds if not thousands of miles away, leaving what are basically strip mines, eroding soil and degrading environment in areas where sand mining is carried out, and filling the air with dust that makes it impossible for people living in that area to be outside their own homes or even to hang laundry. Solutions are always simple when the downside falls on someone else's head.

I think everyone is short sighted or near sighted about a lot of issues.
 
I think everyone is short sighted or near sighted about a lot of issues.
link

article said:
A new poll shows the Republican primary for Arizona governor is virtually a dead heat. Kari Lake remains in the lead, while her main opponent, Karrin Taylor Robson, continues to close the gap. However, the outcome remains in the air as many voters are still undecided, with only three weeks left until the primary.

Lake, a former news anchor, held a comfortable lead in the governor race several months ago. A poll conducted by HighGround had Lake at the top with 30% of the vote and Robson trailing at 9.5% in April. Now, HighGround shows the two Republicans are statistically deadlocked, with Lake at 39% and Robson at 35.3%.
And this is where the country v city mouse stuff bothers me... because this ain't about country and city mice. There is a candidate in the GOP primary for GOVERNOR of Arizona, who was solidly in the lead almost exclusively because she say Trump had the election stolen from him. She is still in the lead.

Robson, Ducey... these are stalwart conservatives! Lake, a professional news anchor. Not even a reporter! But she says something against Covid-19, says Biden stole the election, and she gets that 30 to 35% support almost automatically.

Our politics are getting to a point where it isn't even about issues at all, but absurd raving conspiracy theories.
 
I don’t think that the guy from Ohio as less intelligent but I do think that he hasn’t seen much that gives him hope his kids will have a better life, or that he is valued as a citizen.

He had a good job, was a manager at a company that made stuff (cabinets), had friends, family and most of the things that people say they want. As he said, just a normal family man. I think he had what 99+% of all humans on this planet WISH they had.

But someone convinced him that he deserved more, and that the "more" he deserved was being stolen from him.
IOW, Trump tapped into his primal greed like he did/does to so many others. Holds himself up as an example - "All you have to do is be totally strong, and fight for what you deserve like I do." Not mentioned of course, is how helpful it is to first inherit $400,000,000 or so to help you "fight".
I do feel sorry for him, but also feel like he should be held up as an example of what happens to you if you are a trumpsucker. It was good IMO to hear about his life after 1/6. It would make a classic country song, losing his job and his former life... don't know about his dog but that would be a good add if he lost that too.
It's sad, but I don't hold him harmless - far from it.

We have got to give them space to do that.

I don't think we owe them "space" or anything else. They need to "summon the courage to do the right thing", to borrow a phrase from their mango model. If they won't or don't, they fucking DESERVE to lose it all.
Nobody likes it when they are being looked down upon.
Funny... because these people love Trump because he looks down at all others.
And that's what a lot of urbanites and so called progressives do with regards to people who are in small towns, rural areas, manufacturing.
Funny... because I have a college degree so I'm considered by 'these people' to not "work hard" for a living.
Believe it or not, it is possible to disagree with someone without thinking they are stupid or ignorant.
Intelligence seems to come with a pair of components: partisan and all-purpose. The people supporting Trump could be very smart all-purpose wise, but when it comes to partisan intelligence, they are bitter troglodytes.

Finally, the people that invaded the Capitol were largely middle to lower-upper class management folks. Not people that are laborers, they couldn't just take the time off.
Yes—small town/country folks ‘look down’ on city folk as much as city folk look down on country folk—but in a bitter sweet way: their kids get a fancy college degree and leave the farm/small town. They worry their kids will look down on them—and they worry the grandkids won’t know where food comes from or how to repair a garment or a kitchen faucet or change a tire. They’re proud of their kids’ success and feel their way of life not just slipping away but being subsumed by anonymous city life.

You feel that country folks look down on you as lazy for having a degree? Probably not as much as a lot of college educated people look down on farmers and factory workers and small town anything, including small town doctors and lawyers.
The fantasy that "city folk just don't get it" is false. Just like how Atheists tend to know MUCH more about Bibles and religious history than "blind believers" of their religion, College educated folk have far more awareness of how the food supply works in America (scientifically, economically, morally, etc..) than college-age farm-hands that got homeschooled and never intend to leave the family farm.
Meanwhilst, back at the farm, those are the people that have no clue what city life is like and what anyone else in the world does to contribute to society, outside of where their corn goes... while they operate their tractors, designed and built by engineers, and consume the internet - completely incapable of understanding social dynamics outside their local church group.
Intellectually? Maybe. That’s a big maybe I’ve learned from being married a long time to a big city boy who got his Ph.D. In economics and still doesn’t know if the corn is ahead or behind schedule if we go on a country drive much less what it means for the local farmers.

How to actually grow a crop, get it harvested, get it to market? Which crop will do the best on a particular bit of land? With your best guess at market and weather conditions and whatever the bank is willing to do?

I mean can you tell a hayfield from soybeans? Timothy from alfalfa? Or wheat? I assume you know corn from soybeans and cows from bulls but can you identify a steer? Know what to feed chickens or pigs?

Those church groups you look down on help their neighbors if someone is sick or injured or a piece of equipment breaks or if someone has a heart attack. By help, I mean, show up with a hundred thousand dollar piece of equipment to do what needs doing in time and well. Equipment they largely maintain themselves or did until it stated coming with too many computer components.

You know who raised those engineers? Judging my by high school graduating class: a bunch of farmers who are smart enough to see how undervalued their work is and want an easier life for their kids.
I can identify an expert in an area and can tell the difference between bullshit and experience. I trust the education that Farmers have about Farming and trust their judgement on RELATED topics... "They" on the other hand, do not seem to be able to do the same.... City Folks know who to trust on what matters, bt Country Folk seem completely lost in that respect, prime for scamming.
 
Country people are not angry because of mean tweets. They’re tired of being considered stupid, backward and ignorant. And are tired of property taxes and crop prices driving them off their land or their neighbors, with the new people complaining that manure smells bad and farm equipment moves too slow. It’s painful to know that the land your family has owned and farmed for over 100 years will not support your kids and they’ll be off in the city living in some little box.
Which part of that is supporting a white nationalist coup supposed to solve?

I think we are getting bogged down by conflating the city/country us vs them dynamic, with the actual problem of trumpsuckers. The problem of trumpsuckers, as has been pointed out, is not that they are all country bumpkins. They're NOT, as also pointed out regarding the 1/6 crowd; they obviously weren't at their jobs that day, and had money for travel and lodging...
The problem of trumpsuckers was identified above; it's about the desire for an authoritarian father figure they can look up to, identify with and pretend to resemble. I just wonder what depths of self hate causes anyone to look up to DJT.
I don't like this idea that Trumpism is somehow justified by urban elitism. It's a wan "both sides" argument that fails to take the threat of right wing extremism seriously. Is there bigotry in cities? Of course there is. But no one I know of is trying to kill or even hurt poor rural whites. If it's a real problem, attempts to violently otherthrow democratic governance is not a reasonable or equitable response, and I don't think sympathizing with the feelings of the alt-right political engine will do anything to dissuade the insurrectionist cause. If everyone in every city had a magical change of heart tomorrow and never said anything rude or condescending about poor Southern whites ever again... they would not abandon their project. Because their goal isn't to make city people treat them more politely. Their goal is to seize the reins of government and silence or eliminate everyone they consider a threat to their understanding of the national culture. Portayals of some of those enemies as condescending assholes are a weapon for their war, a tool to recruit rural middle class families to their side, not a true motivating issue for the alt-right. As such, they'll happily make the accusation whether its true or not.
Their goal to "seize the reins of government and silence or eliminate everyone they consider a threat to their understanding of the national culture" involves what Tucker Carlson and Steve Miller have been discussing on Fox... that "the problem" is that there are too many non-whites in America, and we therefore cannot feel safe to rely on our American "brothers" because they aren't.
Yes, that is literally what they were saying just yesterday.
At some point it has to be ok to just say, "you are unqualified to express an opinion.. sit down, shut up, and let the experts to what they have been doing for centuries that has kept America Great all along".
 
You don’t win hearts or minds by ridicule, contempt or disdain.
But that's exactly the Republican strategy and it's been winning hearts and minds while screaming about critical race theory and the liberal elitists.
that's a very good point - the mindset of the DNC and of liberals in general in the U.S. has been one of appeasement, and basing all of their political decisions on what the people who hate them and will never agree with *anything* that they do think about the issues.
it has not been going well.
 
You don’t win hearts or minds by ridicule, contempt or disdain.
But that's exactly the Republican strategy and it's been winning hearts and minds while screaming about critical race theory and the liberal elitists.
You're no kind of god-fearing conservative if you don't have enemies to hate.
 
Looking at the Ohio 2020 exit poll stats, something peculiar comes along.

Making less than $50,000:
Biden 52 to 46 Biden favored

Making more than $50,000:
Trump 43 to 56 Trump favored

That'd be the suburb dwellers.

The way you wrote the stat is confusing. (I read "Trump 43 to 56" as Trump getting 43.) I've marked it up to be one of several alternatives that make the relationships clearer.

But since I'm responding anyway, let me offer:

(a) Demographs don't factor into just two clusters — there are seven! :) (Pew Research uses its raw data to derive several "Clusters" of Voter type. They probably show it proudly on-line right now! I think it's relevant enough here that lpetrich or another Pew fan ought to post their present model right here right now in this thread. (Does it have 7 voter categories, or 8? 9?)

Instead of cluster analysis, one can do component analysis.

Consider the scientist who is investigating variations among pigeons, sea slugs, whatever. He might run BOTH statistical softwares: Finding both Clusters AND ranked Components, and studying which analysis is most informative. He might prefer Cluster or Component depending on whether the pigeons being studied are from several or one species(s) respectively.​

lpetrich — you were interested in this. Did you calculate the eigenvectors for Pew's public-access (2016 election) database? (I could do it easily but IIRC Pew's data is in some semi-proprietary format I didn't want to bother converting.)

(b) Anyway, the vectors mentioned (55-45 and 45-55 or such) are weak correlations obviously. And speaking of "farmers" at all is rather a red herring, no? Ordinary Americans running a small farm are rare these days.


Well, what do we expect? Lots and I do mean LOTS of oh so smugly superior progressives think that working class people and those living in rural areas and flyover zones really don't count for much. They're just a bunch of bumpkins with bad clothes and worse tats, overweight, bad hair and bad teeth and no prospects. They only count to serve their betters...whatever their betters deserve.

I am really really really serious that those are the people I grew up surrounded by and today, if my car broke down in the county I grew up in, I could walk to the door of the nearest house and they'd help me out, probably invite me to dinner. Maybe even fix my car for me. Even if they had been reading my facebook page for the past 6 years or so. They are decent people who have worked hard all their lives without much pay, and without a lot of chances. They have bigotries and prejudices as do all of us if we are actually even a little bit honest with ourselves. They see value in their jobs, producing your food, packaging your food, making whatever it is you are using in your house that wasn't made overseas. They see value in their lives and in their hopes and dreams.

Shame on us if we can't or won't.

People are people. (There is interesting brain research. One example: Liberals follow 4 moral precepts, while conservatives follow 7. The three extra precepts that liberals tend not to follow are something like: Loyalty, Obedience, "Us-vs-Them." (I've chosen names for these 3 conservative morals that a liberal might intend as derogatory, especially "Us-vs-Them." Sorry.)

But even if conservatism partly involves social-behavior genes not conducive to a liberal utopia, they are still PEOPLE. Moreover their morality precepts will often prove efficacious!

We are mostly rational thinkers, and agree that Type 5 voters are usually better informed than Type 3 voters. So what? That Type 3 voter might be the same guy who fixed Toni's car.

Why don't we just all get along? We're all people. Bobby Bob is rude? Turn the other cheek! (As a side benefit, types 2 and 3 are more likely to vote (D) if D's are polite to them.)
 
Or the guy who fixes my car ( knocks wood: I haven’t needed a car repair in years knicks wood again and throws salt over left shoulder) but my contractor and the guy who re-wired my house are pretty liberal. Born, raised and educated right in this here small town in flyover country.

I don’t often talk politics with most of my best friends from where I grew up, but over the last few years, we have and guess what? Despite growing up in a tiny town in a red state, everyone except me being very church going, one even going to a Bible college(!) — all of us are pretty liberal, for Americans. Especially the one who went to Bible college.
 
I have seen for years urbanite distain towards rural and small town dwellers
you keep saying that, and everyone seems to be fine with just letting you get away with it, but i call bullshit.
This "bullshit calling" is shown false by...

'city people' don't have disdain for rural people, because 'city people' don't have any thoughts about rural people *period*.

the only city people with any sort of active disdain for rural people are former rural people who now live in a big city.
if you grew up in an urban area and never spent time in a truly bumfuck region and have no experience with it, you literally don't think about those people.

this whole "nyeh city people are so disdainful of country folk" meme is just a combination of classic conservative projection (blaming others for the thing you're doing) and buying into a narrative you saw on TV that doesn't exist in real life.

Think about it: the two coasts disregard the rest of the country
and therein lies the truth - there's no disdain, there's simply disregard, mostly born of ignorance (the innocent kind) and when it isn't a complete lack of acknowledgement entirely it's disdain of rural folk for being absolute horrendous pieces of shit and not because they live in a small town.

'small town' culture is an equally disgusting and degenerate mass of bullshit as what you see from the ultra rich - completely delusional idiots with no concept of life outside of their own little bubble, mired in rigid hypocrisy and fantasy in a pathetic attempt to force their narrow view of reality on everyone else.

there's nothing inherently wrong with living in a small town, but the entire concept of a small town is predicated on something that no longer exists.
small self-contained and self-sustaining rural communities in the U.S. started out as leeches suckling at the engorged varicose veins of plantations and/or gold mines. they sprouted up around some kind of economic backbone that artificially supported them, and were only able to exist on that scale due to the outside resources brought in by that backbone.
when the slaves and the gold went away these towns all withered up and barely survived until the manufacturing boom hit, and that only happened because they were all so poor and desperate that it was profitable to use them as factory slave labor.
when that went away because there are even cheaper brown people in other countries, the towns immediately died again.

the big fat lie that every small town in the U.S. in the present day is founded on is that it's a self-contained system... that the town doesn't need the 'outside world' and can get by solely on its own local ecosystem.
and that's probably true for a small town that contents itself with subsistence living-off-the-land and local trade, but here's the big fat secret rural types don't want you to know that makes the whole thing fall apart: none of them want that.
small town people want infrastructure, water treatment, electricity, daily mail service, high speed internet, HBO, and a walmart.
they want an urban life, they just don't want to have to be around other people or to generate any kind of viable economic activity to make bringing it all to them worth anyone's investment to bother with.

and so they sit in their dusty bumfuck nowhere collection of shacks and bemoan 'big city' people, because those evil 'big city' people have bent over fucking backwards to bring the modern world to them and they resent it because fucked up inbred protestant idiocy makes them think being given something means they are 'lesser than.'


this is such BS, this is like saying that cannibalism appeals to anyone with cancer, because they have cancer and want a cure for it, and cannibalism is.... something something?

the absolute fact is that rural idiots vote republican, and republicans do absolutely NOTHING in any way shape or form to materially improve their living conditions.
democrats verifiably DO improve their living conditions, but by doing so initiate some kind of fucktarded hillbilly vengeance pact against the very people who are trying to help them, because that "hard work" ethic you're so fond of makes these communities incapable of accepting the economic and infrastructure assistance they require in order to live in the modern world without going completely ape shit over the fact that someone handed them something.

rural people actively vote to destroy their own lives, and they do it year after year and they are screamingly proud of it.
they aren't struggling with economic hardship and just wanting to live a safe and stable american dream life... they fucked themselves into desperation, and now they're trying to cut the throat of anyone who tries to help them.
So yeah... pretty serious disdain.
 
So yeah... pretty serious disdain.
And herein lies the problem with excising entire sections of the thread because of the feels - now we get to rehash the same BS a second time.

You don't seem to see the difference between valid criticism and disdain.
Just because they're stupid people making stupid decisions for stupid reasons doesn't make them lesser than, it just makes them stupid - it isn't a moral failing on their part, and isn't hatred on my part to recognize it and suggest that broader society should do something to mitigate the impact of it.

The fact that the ballsack chortling idiots who founded this country did so by capitulating to the political greed of slave owners means that now we have a numerical minority of the population with equal representational power within our government to a vast majority, and those people have consistently rejected any and every attempt to use governmental policy to try to improve the material conditions of their lives.
Instead, year after year they vote for a party that has the explicit political message of destroying their lives for the profit of a rich few.

And why do these people do this? Why is it that conservative/regressive policies have demonstrably ruined their very existence and yet they keep on steadfastly refusing to change any of their political tactics to try to address their issues?

I won't placate children who have proven they are incapable of caring for themselves, but that doesn't mean I'm disdainful of them.
Failure to recognize the problem and confront it for their own good is the true disdain - people like you and Toni seem to want huge swaths of this country to literally destroy their own lives just so that they get to be the ones to do it, and then sit around tut-tutting while you blame everyone but them for their circumstances.
 
I have seen for years urbanite distain towards rural and small town dwellers
you keep saying that, and everyone seems to be fine with just letting you get away with it, but i call bullshit.
This "bullshit calling" is shown false by...

'city people' don't have disdain for rural people, because 'city people' don't have any thoughts about rural people *period*.

the only city people with any sort of active disdain for rural people are former rural people who now live in a big city.
if you grew up in an urban area and never spent time in a truly bumfuck region and have no experience with it, you literally don't think about those people.

this whole "nyeh city people are so disdainful of country folk" meme is just a combination of classic conservative projection (blaming others for the thing you're doing) and buying into a narrative you saw on TV that doesn't exist in real life.

Think about it: the two coasts disregard the rest of the country
and therein lies the truth - there's no disdain, there's simply disregard, mostly born of ignorance (the innocent kind) and when it isn't a complete lack of acknowledgement entirely it's disdain of rural folk for being absolute horrendous pieces of shit and not because they live in a small town.

'small town' culture is an equally disgusting and degenerate mass of bullshit as what you see from the ultra rich - completely delusional idiots with no concept of life outside of their own little bubble, mired in rigid hypocrisy and fantasy in a pathetic attempt to force their narrow view of reality on everyone else.

there's nothing inherently wrong with living in a small town, but the entire concept of a small town is predicated on something that no longer exists.
small self-contained and self-sustaining rural communities in the U.S. started out as leeches suckling at the engorged varicose veins of plantations and/or gold mines. they sprouted up around some kind of economic backbone that artificially supported them, and were only able to exist on that scale due to the outside resources brought in by that backbone.
when the slaves and the gold went away these towns all withered up and barely survived until the manufacturing boom hit, and that only happened because they were all so poor and desperate that it was profitable to use them as factory slave labor.
when that went away because there are even cheaper brown people in other countries, the towns immediately died again.

the big fat lie that every small town in the U.S. in the present day is founded on is that it's a self-contained system... that the town doesn't need the 'outside world' and can get by solely on its own local ecosystem.
and that's probably true for a small town that contents itself with subsistence living-off-the-land and local trade, but here's the big fat secret rural types don't want you to know that makes the whole thing fall apart: none of them want that.
small town people want infrastructure, water treatment, electricity, daily mail service, high speed internet, HBO, and a walmart.
they want an urban life, they just don't want to have to be around other people or to generate any kind of viable economic activity to make bringing it all to them worth anyone's investment to bother with.

and so they sit in their dusty bumfuck nowhere collection of shacks and bemoan 'big city' people, because those evil 'big city' people have bent over fucking backwards to bring the modern world to them and they resent it because fucked up inbred protestant idiocy makes them think being given something means they are 'lesser than.'


this is such BS, this is like saying that cannibalism appeals to anyone with cancer, because they have cancer and want a cure for it, and cannibalism is.... something something?

the absolute fact is that rural idiots vote republican, and republicans do absolutely NOTHING in any way shape or form to materially improve their living conditions.
democrats verifiably DO improve their living conditions, but by doing so initiate some kind of fucktarded hillbilly vengeance pact against the very people who are trying to help them, because that "hard work" ethic you're so fond of makes these communities incapable of accepting the economic and infrastructure assistance they require in order to live in the modern world without going completely ape shit over the fact that someone handed them something.

rural people actively vote to destroy their own lives, and they do it year after year and they are screamingly proud of it.
they aren't struggling with economic hardship and just wanting to live a safe and stable american dream life... they fucked themselves into desperation, and now they're trying to cut the throat of anyone who tries to help them.
So yeah... pretty serious disdain.
And herein lies the problem with excising entire sections of the thread because of the feels - now we get to rehash the same BS a second time.

You don't seem to see the difference between valid criticism and disdain.
Just because they're stupid people making stupid decisions for stupid reasons doesn't make them lesser than, it just makes them stupid - it isn't a moral failing on their part, and isn't hatred on my part to recognize it and suggest that broader society should do something to mitigate the impact of it.

The fact that the ball-chugging idiots who founded this country did so by capitulating to the political greed of slave owners means that now we have a numerical minority of the population with equal representational power within our government to a vast majority, and those people have consistently rejected any and every attempt to use governmental policy to try to improve the material conditions of their lives.
Instead, year after year they vote for a party that has the explicit political message of destroying their lives for the profit of a rich few.

And why do these people do this? Why is it that conservative/regressive policies have demonstrably ruined their very existence and yet they keep on steadfastly refusing to change any of their political tactics to try to address their issues?

I won't placate children who have proven they are incapable of caring for themselves, but doesn't mean I'm disdainful of them.
Failure to recognize the problem and confront it for their own good is the true disdain - people like you and Toni seem to want huge swaths of this country to literally destroy their own lives just so that they get to be the ones to do it, and sit around tut-tutting while you blame everyone but them for their circumstances.

So what? It’s no longer socially acceptable to use the n word anymore and you’ve just got to find some place to put all that bigotry and hatred so you’ve decided that everyone who does not live in a city is stupid and ignorant?

How very enlightened of you.
 

So what? It’s no longer socially acceptable to use the n word anymore and you’ve just got to find some place to put all that bigotry and hatred so you’ve decided that everyone who does not live in a city is stupid and ignorant?
What bigotry and what hatred?

It's not my fault that an entire demographic of the population of this country has spent decades proving they can't take care of themselves.
If the only thing you can come up with as a response to me recognizing that reality is: "omg you're such a meany head" because you don't like people stating facts, well then I suppose good for you for being unable to have a conversation.

How very enlightened of you.
Yeah, it is. You might want to give a try to actually facing reality instead of crying about the fact that people on the internet don't instantly kneel before whatever pronouncement you've made.
If you think that people that consciously choose to wreck their own lives for *generations* are not demonstrating their inability to care for themselves politically, feel free to explain that one - I'd love to hear it.

Come to it, you and and Emily have both failed completely to even address anything I said, other than to stamp your feet and cry about it.
I'd love to be wrong about my view on this subject, present a convincing argument and I'll change my mind.
Or hell, if you want to really impress me present *any* argument that isn't you fluffing your post count for the sake of showing off how upset you are that I posted something you don't like.
 

So what? It’s no longer socially acceptable to use the n word anymore and you’ve just got to find some place to put all that bigotry and hatred so you’ve decided that everyone who does not live in a city is stupid and ignorant?
What bigotry and what hatred?

It's not my fault that an entire demographic of the population of this country has spent decades proving they can't take care of themselves.
If the only thing you can come up with as a response to me recognizing that reality is: "omg you're such a meany head" because you don't like people stating facts, well then I suppose good for you for being unable to have a conversation.

How very enlightened of you.
Yeah, it is. You might want to give a try to actually facing reality instead of crying about the fact that people on the internet don't instantly kneel before whatever pronouncement you've made.
If you think that people that consciously choose to wreck their own lives for *generations* are not demonstrating their inability to care for themselves politically, feel free to explain that one - I'd love to hear it.

Come to it, you and and Emily have both failed completely to even address anything I said, other than to stamp your feet and cry about it.
I'd love to be wrong about my view on this subject, present a convincing argument and I'll change my mind.
Or hell, if you want to really impress me present *any* argument that isn't you fluffing your post count for the sake of showing off how upset you are that I posted something you don't like.
Who has proven ‘they can’t take care of themselves?’ What proof do you have? What data?
 
You don’t win hearts or minds by ridicule, contempt or disdain.
But that's exactly the Republican strategy and it's been winning hearts and minds while screaming about critical race theory and the liberal elitists.
that's a very good point - the mindset of the DNC and of liberals in general in the U.S. has been one of appeasement, and basing all of their political decisions on what the people who hate them and will never agree with *anything* that they do think about the issues.
it has not been going well.
Yes H. Clinton's use of the word "deplorables" neatly encapsulated what her and her ilk thought of those who would not vote for her. She dropped her guard for just a moment.
 
Who has proven ‘they can’t take care of themselves?’ What proof do you have? What data?
Well, that post is either going to be a wall of links, or else we're going to have to just agree to a couple of things.

1. Low-population counties, especially in the south and the mid-west, have a rather overwhelming trend of electing Republicans.
Can we agree on that? Or do I need to hold your hand with election maps?

2. Low population areas, ie "small towns" especially in the south and the mid-west are suffering from a severe economic and infrastructure deficit which is greatly impacting their stability and quality of life.
Can we agree on that? Or do I need to hold your hand with articles and studies about the overall state of small towns and rural areas?

3. Republicans explicitly and without subtlety operate a political machine which both creates huge deficits in economic stability and infrastructure, as well as causing a host of other problems including but not limited to: racial tensions, police militarization, funneling public funds into the private hands of the wealthy, limiting or removing entirely access to public services, and lack of regulation of industry that is deeply harmful to those most vulnerable.
Can we agree on that? Or do I need to type out a college thesis paper explaining all of this to you?

4. Most small towns, especially in the south and the mid-west, were formed in one of a relatively few ways:
A. as what are effectively way-stations or supply depots for plantations.
B. as what are effectively way-stations or supply depots for gold mines.
C. as what are effectively way-stations or supply depots for farms.
D. as what are effectively company towns for a factory.
E. some settler in the 1800s got sick of city life and just plopped down in the middle of nowhere (or near to nowhere) and said "OK this is a town now" without any real thought to the long-term sustainability of a growing community.
Can we agree on that? Are you getting the pattern yet to this question?
 
You don’t win hearts or minds by ridicule, contempt or disdain.
But that's exactly the Republican strategy and it's been winning hearts and minds while screaming about critical race theory and the liberal elitists.
that's a very good point - the mindset of the DNC and of liberals in general in the U.S. has been one of appeasement, and basing all of their political decisions on what the people who hate them and will never agree with *anything* that they do think about the issues.
it has not been going well.
Yes H. Clinton's use of the word "deplorables" neatly encapsulated what her and her ilk thought of those who would not vote for her. She dropped her guard for just a moment.
So, putting aside how monumentally fucking stupid that statement of yours is on general grounds, I'm almost curious to find out exactly how you explain two things:

1. In what possible twisted inability to grasp the concept of language could what she said be taken to mean "those who would not vote for her"?

2. In what way is anything she said factually inaccurate?

“You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” Clinton said. “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.”
 
Back
Top Bottom