• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

14-Year-Old Murder Suspect Allegedly Killed Siblings to Save Them from Hell

phands

Veteran Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
1,976
Location
New York, Manhattan, Upper West Side
Basic Beliefs
Hardcore Atheist
that good ol' true xtian love just shining out again.....

There’s a strong argument to be made that threatening children with the fictional idea of Hellfire is a form of emotional abuse, as many former believers will attest to, but it gets even worse when people who don’t realize that Hell is imaginary take actions to prevent other people from going there.


It’s the threat of Hell that allegedly prompted 14-year-old Nickalas Kedrowitz of Ripley County, Indiana to kill his two younger siblings, 23-month-old Desiree McCartney and 11-month-old Nathaniel Ritz.




Indiana State Police detectives say the teen fatally smothered 23-month-old [half-sister] Desiree McCartney with a towel at their home on Maple Street in Osgood on May 1, 2017. She died in the hospital five days later. An autopsy could not determine a cause of death, but did reveal that the child suffered a prolonged period of anoxia to the brain.


Then, just 81 days after McCartney’s death, eleven-month-old [step-brother] Nathaniel Ritz died July 20. Nathaniel was rushed to a local hospital upon being found unresponsive in the same home. A doctor determined that he died of asystole, a type of cardiac arrest.


Kedrowitz was removed from his home after the first death, then placed back just before the second occurred. He was the last person seen with both children. And his motive was apparently trying to rescue them from eternal damnation.


“There were several remarks made to police officers, both detectives Miller and Tressler with the State Police, about freeing the siblings from some sort of hell,” [Ripley County Prosecutor Ric] Hertel told reporters.


The teen allegedly told another relative in January that he had broken one of the 10 Commandments, “Thou shalt not kill.” He shared that he had killed his brother and sister, according to the court affidavit.
It’s unclear if he had any mental illness. But religion permeated his thinking, no matter how warped it was to begin with. Christians may argue all the babies needed was Jesus to be saved from Hell, but some also believe you can’t go to Hell unless you had the chance to learn about Jesus and rejected Him. Aborted fetuses, miscarriages, and babies who die within a year or two of being born, then, aren’t punished for something that was out of their control.


It’s not completely irrational to understand the alleged murderer’s line of thinking: If you kill the babies now, they won’t have the chance to be doomed forever. He was doing them a favor. It’s all kinds of disturbing, but when you mix irrational beliefs with fear and guilt, don’t be surprised when bad things happen.


Prosecutors are asking the judge to try Kedrowitz as an adult. If he’s tried as a juvenile, there’s a chance he could be released by the time he’s 18.

Of course religion is dangerous, brain-damaging abuse.


http://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/...gedly-killed-siblings-to-save-them-from-hell/
 
Wait'll he finds out that the Age Of Accountability is non-Biblical.
And Limbo was an invention of French philosophers.
 
The kid is obviously severely disturbed. But if one believes the notion that a child can't go to Hell if they never reach the age of non-innocence (or whatever you call it), then what this kid did is proactive and logical. That is, he's ensured eternal life with God in Heaven.

The same also applies to abortion doctors. If life begins at conception, then doctors who daily perform abortion procedures have saved more souls than the vast majority of priests and pastors.

Less darkly, the person who never hears of a god of any kind is similarly protected because they never had the chance to hear of the "Good News" (according to many Christians).

It's all so absurd and leads to such bizarre outcomes. You'd think that at some point enough people would've just dropped all the crazy explanations and admit they don't have the answers. Yet they don't.
 
Clearly the issue here is that children are exposed to violent Bible stories and we should either ban the book or have the government implement some sort of rating system so that consumers can be aware of what verses are not appropriate for kids.
 
Clearly the issue here is that children are exposed to violent Bible stories and we should either ban the book or have the government implement some sort of rating system so that consumers can be aware of what verses are not appropriate for kids.

Well...banning books is a bad thing in general...even damaging, vicious books like the bible. However, I think that the idea of not exposing people to religion until they're 18 or even 21 has merit. Then bibles and similar horror books could be kept on the top shelf out of the reach of vulnerable kids.
 
Clearly the issue here is that children are exposed to violent Bible stories and we should either ban the book or have the government implement some sort of rating system so that consumers can be aware of what verses are not appropriate for kids.

Well...banning books is a bad thing in general...even damaging, vicious books like the bible. However, I think that the idea of not exposing people to religion until they're 18 or even 21 has merit. Then bibles and similar horror books could be kept on the top shelf out of the reach of vulnerable kids.

We don't need to ban the books, we just need to give parents the information and tools to be able to protect their children.
 
I recently read Lee Strobel's numbskulled Case for Faith (investigative reporter gets to the bedrock truth about Bible faith by -- er -- interviewing inerrantists.) He pretends to a Fox-styled 'fair 'n' balanced' approach by taking objections to his panel of 'experts'. Applying this to the OP: his Objection #4 is 'God isn;t worthy of worship if He kills innocent children'. So he brings this objection to a Christian university professor and asks how Joshua and other Bible books full of genocide can be justified. True to form, his Christian expert takes the position that God-ordered wars of extermination are justified, holy, necessary to preserve God's people. All those pesky tribes who already lived in the Promised Land were wicked anyway, and had to be erased. The children of the Midianites (and all the other targeted groups) will be taken by God into protective custody like Trump takes immigrant toddlers. They're innocent, so they'll go straight to heaven. Isn't it great to know that the faith that pretends to a god-ordained value of agape can be used to justify killing kids?
 
If the bible is inerrant, then xtianity should die out, because....

For there are eunuchs, that were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are eunuchs, that were made eunuchs by men: and there are eunuchs, that made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it (Matthew 19:12)
I live in hope.

The bible is truly a disgusting piece of filth.
 
According to other news sources, when investigators asked the boy what he meant by hell, he said "chores". He told his great-aunt that he wanted to save the babies from his mom's fiancé. Friendly Atheist articles seem to be mostly conjecture.
 
According to other news sources, when investigators asked the boy what he meant by hell, he said "chores". He told his great-aunt that he wanted to save the babies from his mom's fiancé. Friendly Atheist articles seem to be mostly conjecture.

I've found that is often the case too.
 
Back
Top Bottom