laughing dog
Contributor
Like the GOP, the DNC is a private institution. Unless there is some evidence that the DNC violated some laws instead of hurting the feelings of Bernie Backers, there is no reason for any investigation. Nor is there any reason for the DNC to reveal more to try and combat any partial picture the leaked emails may present if those revelations are embarrassing in another way.No, they are not. We do not know if everything he leaked is true or if it left out exculpatory information.
The holders of that information (be it the DNC or the government) can release the entirely of everything. Nothing is stopping them from doing so but themselves. If he got this much out, good for him. He's under attack for getting out what he did. Do you also want him under attack for NOT getting out what he didn't? And again, what he got out should probably be looked into. If its disproved then he's engaged in propaganda. If its verified, then he's let out the truth, and people should be asking why it was hidden from the public in the first place.
Mr Assange plotted a course of action that he had to know would help a narcissistic time bomb to get elected. Mr Assange did no investigation - he took stolen information and revealed it. The revelations that the DNC is not 100% squeaky clean nor that it favored a non-Democrat as its candidate would not be news to any person who functions at a minimal level of intelligence. Anyone who actually cared about the outcomes would have weighed the probative value of that non-news with its potential effect on the election. A responsible course of action would have been to wait until after the election. Mr. Assange knew (or should have known) the risks he was taking. In this instance, the ends (revealing the "truth") do not justify the means (using stolen information) especially when the ultimate end is helping Trump get elected.