• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Australia is getting a new Prime Minister

Patooka

Contributor
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
7,823
Location
Sydney
Basic Beliefs
aaa
This is still ongoing with details to follow

Scott Morrison will be Australia's next prime minister after he beat Peter Dutton 45 votes to 40 in a Liberal party room vote.

Fun fact; in the last decade of Australian politics, not a single Prime Minister has lasted a full term. But man. did we dodge a bullet with Dutton not getting in. And if Turnbull picks up his ball and goes home, that will most likely lead to another general election.
 
And Turnbull has now confirmed he will be leaving politics in "the near future".
 
And Turnbull has now confirmed he will be leaving politics in "the near future".

If he left now, wouldn't that trigger a by-election? The libs could lose that right now. If he hangs on until Morrison calls it they may have some sort of chance.

Yep, and that would trigger a general election as the Coalition wouldn't have a majority in either House due to the dual citizenship fiasco last year. And Turnbull appears very resentful about how this week has played out, so who knows which way he will jump.

Here's Annabel Crabb's take on it all:

Malcolm Turnbull will go down in history as the prime minister most disproportionately and gorily executed by his colleagues on the most nebulous of grounds.

Essentially, his crimes against the Liberal Party were a vibe thing.

Even when he was doing what his conservative colleagues wanted him to do, he failed to convince them because deep down, they felt he didn't really mean it.

Their fear always was that Malcolm Turnbull — despite everything he said — was secretly, in his heart, running a Labor government.

And isn't that funny.

Because that's exactly what they'll now get.
 
Turnbull held out until Morrison could get it together.

I hate that the surest way to know there will be a leadership spill is when you hear the potential spiller denying it categorically. Does nobody tell the truth anymore? Even when you know you are going to prove yourself a liar within 24 hours?.

Interesting that Bishop was sidelined. I'm not sorry for her sake. We do not treat female pollies well.
 
Today we welcome our latest Prime Minister, Scott "the best you can say about him is that at least he's not as bad a choice as Peter Dutton" Morrison.

Religious nutter and expert in cruelty, the sooner he and his vile party are out of power the better.
 
It seems that your right wing is paralleling the worst of our right wing; climate change denial, fervent religious belief, unhinged demonization of opponents, a dependency on lies to convince themselves that they are right, a voracious need to increase the incomes of the wealthy, and constant bashing of the government that they are too incompetent to run.

All that you need to fill out the suite is for your right to pick a corrupt clown for a leader because he is corrupt and a clown, a right with patriotism for symbols but not the democratic ideals of the nation, and a right with a growing disregard for the rule of law.
 
It seems that your right wing is paralleling the worst of our right wing; climate change denial, fervent religious belief, unhinged demonization of opponents, a dependency on lies to convince themselves that they are right, a voracious need to increase the incomes of the wealthy, and constant bashing of the government that they are too incompetent to run.

Does the name 'Murdoch' ring any bells? If not, you might want to refresh your data banks.
 
It seems that your right wing is paralleling the worst of our right wing; climate change denial, fervent religious belief, unhinged demonization of opponents, a dependency on lies to convince themselves that they are right, a voracious need to increase the incomes of the wealthy, and constant bashing of the government that they are too incompetent to run.

Does the name 'Murdoch' ring any bells? If not, you might want to refresh your data banks.

Ah, yes, Rupert.

I didn't say that one crazy right wing was importing the crazy from the other, I said that the crazy is being developed in parallel.

That being said, Rupert is an example of the cross-pollination of Australia providing our right wing with the needed lies to justify the crazy. It would be hard even for one country's crazy to come up with all of this on its own.

In fact, our right-wing (and I am sure the Aussie right-wing) owes a large debt of gratitude for methods and goals to the granddaddy of the 20th century's far-right movements, the thousand years Reich, that fell about 986 years short of its target.

I can't be any more specific without having to endure screams of Godwin's Law.
 
It seems that your right wing is paralleling the worst of our right wing; climate change denial, fervent religious belief, unhinged demonization of opponents, a dependency on lies to convince themselves that they are right, a voracious need to increase the incomes of the wealthy, and constant bashing of the government that they are too incompetent to run.

Not paralleling, emulating. Every right wing talking point raised in the US is parrotted by the right in Australia in a matter of days. Everybody in Australian politics agreed to the Paris Agreement when it first came out. No one spoke a word against it until Donald Trump did, and when they did used the exact same bullshit arguments ("bad deal for Australia, these "binding" non-binding goals will cripple the economy etc). Leading the charge was cunt former Prime Minister Tony Abbott who pretty much came out and said we should be copying Donald Trumps stance on it despite being the fucking Prime Minister who signed the agreement on Australia's behalf. The justification for this pivot was, well, because of reasons.

The incest creeps further. Every time an Australian conservative leave politics, or is voted out, the first thing they do is run to the nearest US far right group to get their confirmation bias reinforced. John Howard did it with the Heritage Foundation (FYI it was the first time he spoke in public since he lost the 2007 election), Tony Abbott has done it twice. It's almost as though no one in Australian politics is allowed an idea unless it comes from America first.

Right wing pundits are the same. Everything you read by Piers Akerman was said in Breitbart a week before, Andrew Bolt has a very unhealthy fanboy fixation with Milo Yiannopoulos and Quadrant magazine thinks we live in a Tom Clancey-esque Cold War era. So basically the right in Australia is a foreign adaptation of the right in the US; a Malaysian Seinfeld, if you will. Lacks context, doesn't translate well, but dammit we're going to have a crack at it anyways.

All that you need to fill out the suite is for your right to pick a corrupt clown for a leader because he is corrupt and a clown, a right with patriotism for symbols but not the democratic ideals of the nation, and a right with a growing disregard for the rule of law

I am damn certain the only reason this hasn't happened is because voting is compulsory in Australia. Otherwise we would have had Pauline Hanson or Fred Nile running things already. Maybe even Clive Palmer or Jaqui Lambie. Fringe nuts become relevant when apathy gets a vote in things.
 
Back
Top Bottom