I'm not sure about that. We over here had a female pm for three years.
Let's see this in syllogistic form.
Angelo thinks Julia Gillard was a poor national leader,
Julia Gillard is a woman,
therefore,
Angelo thinks all women are poor national leaders
I call it the Dinosaur Fallacy; a special case of the Illicit Minor.
Her government lurched from one crisis to the next.
Let's see:
- two leadership crises, over a year apart from each other
- Labor's unsustainable boat people policy
and...what else? You must have a low threshold for calling something a crisis, a threshold which has since mysteriously been raised sky high since the incumbent morons came into power.
Spending money we didn't have was her specialty.
She also does a killer lasagne.
The International Monetary fund has declared the Howard government to be more profligate than any of the Whitlam, Rudd or Gillard governments.
Let me spell that out for you: Howard wasted more money than Gillard. But of course you never would have realised that by consuming conservative news media. The Australian, for instance, published multiple article attempting to discredit the IMF and maintain the lie that the Coalition can run an economy.
As the incumbents are demonstrating, the Coalition hasn't the faintest idea how to run an economy. They shut down emerging markets, they kill off existing markets, they damage relations with the nation's trading partners, and they have their snouts in the fucking trough.
And they are
spending money we don't have faster, and more recklessly, than Rudd/Gillard.
Many say her government was the worst this country ever had!
These are probably the morons who think Wind Turbine Syndrome should be taken seriously.