lpetrich
Contributor
Safer Streets: Design is Better Than Enforcement | Pedestrian Observations by Alon Levy. He says about enforcement,
All you defenders of police brutality here, is that what you want to see happening? If not, then what would you do to change that situation? Preferably without whining about what victims white people are.
I've bolded a part that I want to emphasize.It is especially important to come up with solutions that do not rely on extensive human enforcement in the US, because of its longstanding problem with police brutality and racism. The expression “driving while black” is common in the US, due to bias the police in the US (and Canada) exhibits against black people. In Europe, even when bias against certain minorities is as bad as in the US, overall police brutality levels are lower in the US by factors ranging from 20 to 100 (see for example data here). In my Twitter feed, black American urbanists express reluctance to so much as call the police on nonviolent crime, fearing that cops would treat them as suspects even if they are the victims. When it comes to urban traffic safety – and so far, Vision Zero in the US is an urban movement – this is compounded by the fact that blacks and other minorities are overrepresented in the cities.
This means that, in the special conditions of US policing, it’s crucial to prevent Vision Zero from becoming yet another pretext for Driving While Black arrests. As it happens, it does not require large changes from best practices in Europe, because those best practices do not involve extensive contact between traffic police and drivers.
All you defenders of police brutality here, is that what you want to see happening? If not, then what would you do to change that situation? Preferably without whining about what victims white people are.