Campus Crazies - Kiddies at U. Missouri, Yale, etc. having difficult time adjusting to adulthood.

[fromderinside]

And the anti-white racists rejoice at that prospect.

Time for the white ones, like us, to cut out the racist jibber jabber and toe the line.

What about non-white racism? I guess that kind of racism is not only acceptable but is part of the party line white people are now expected to toe, right?

So cut out the whining.

Left wing "logic": black radical students intimidating a college professor to resign based on imaginary incidents - "righteous indignation". People pointing out the misbehavior of those radical students - "whining"

Why don't you smear some of that imaginary fecal matter on your face so you can look more brown Derec.

As for black racism it can't be. Racism comes from power. There was a thread all about that. Just because one group can do racist things doesn't mean their target can do the same things. Unbalanced paradigm.

 

[Derec]

Why don't you smear some of that imaginary fecal matter on your face so you can look more brown Derec.

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean except a cheap insult. So par for the course really.

As for black racism it can't be. Racism comes from power.

So, by that logic, only black students can be racist at UoM because they have demonstrated that they wield all the power on that campus. In reality to the Left it's not "racism requires power" but instead they hold blindly to the dogma that "only whites can be racist" and the power thing is just weak apologetics that doesn't withstand even the most cursory scrutiny.

There was a thread all about that. Just because one group can do racist things doesn't mean their target can do the same things. Unbalanced paradigm.

In other words, blacks can be racist against whites at Mizzou, but whites can't be racist against blacks.

 

[untermensche]

Another day another insane whine from the right.

This thread is devoid of one fact.

 

[Derec]

Another day another insane whine from the right.

This thread is devoid of one fact.

Another day, another instance of the Left whining about supposed whining when they run out of actual arguments (which happens quite fast). Classic projection.

 

[untermensche]

Another day another insane whine from the right.

This thread is devoid of one fact.

Another day, another instance of the Left whining about supposed whining when they run out of actual arguments (which happens quite fast). Classic projection.

And still this thread remains devoid of one fact.

 

[Derec]

And still this thread remains devoid of one fact.

Well if we restrict the scope of the analysis to posts by you and your confederates that would indeed be correct.

 

[untermensche]

And still this thread remains devoid of one fact.

Well if we restrict the scope of the analysis to posts by you and your confederates that would indeed be correct.

When one has no facts to present one focuses on other things.

Present one fact and then I may have something to say.

 

[fromderinside]

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean except a cheap insult. So par for the course really.

As for black racism it can't be. Racism comes from power.

So, by that logic, only black students can be racist at UoM because they have demonstrated that they wield all the power on that campus. In reality to the Left it's not "racism requires power" but instead they hold blindly to the dogma that "only whites can be racist" and the power thing is just weak apologetics that doesn't withstand even the most cursory scrutiny.

There was a thread all about that. Just because one group can do racist things doesn't mean their target can do the same things. Unbalanced paradigm.

In other words, blacks can be racist against whites at Mizzou, but whites can't be racist against blacks.

Your post is so silly that I want to make it an example.

The fecal matter reference is to that 'imaginary' swastika made with it in a dorm. Real swastika real fecal matter. Posting outright lies just doesn't get it done Derec! This last statement is personal.

The administration changed by actions from those above the School president and Chancellor who are definitely not black. So the protests by minority students were deemed justified according to those authorities. Not blacks being racist at all.

Your logic is based on false premises which you invented - should I call this another of your lies? Naw. You're just being overly partisan. - so over the top they are laughable.

Watch.

In other words, blacks can be racist against whites at Mizzou, but whites can't be racist against blacks.

ha ha, ha ha.

 

[laughing dog]

I am mightily impressed at the intensity of the butthurt from the usual crowd from this tragedy of a rich white man loses his job due to incompetence.

He lost his job because of a small minority of radical students (note the racist "black power" symbol on their shirts, a symbol which was also associated with Maoist Black Panther Party) who protested due to unsubstantiated rumors of alleged racist incidents (that even if true would not be anything a university professor had any control over).

Your summary is short on facts and long on conservative butthurt talking points. First, President Wolfe is not a professor. Second, they were not protesting just over the alleged incidents but the inattentiveness of the administration to their concerns. Third, President Wolfe did not lose his job, he resigned.

 

[untermensche]

This protest was successful mainly because the black football players and others stood in solidarity.

That is what the right hates more than anything.

Blacks in solidarity effecting change. Any change that isn't top down.

They are supposed to beg for change on their knees.

 

[fromderinside]

This protest was successful mainly because the black football players and others stood in solidarity.

That is what the right hates more than anything.

Blacks in solidarity effecting change. Any change that isn't top down.

They are supposed to beg for change on their knees.

Well then the right should be more consistent in their likes and actions. They really like blacks who can play winning football and they kinda like being able to dump on blacks whenever they want. Notice the imbalance? Rightists would rather have winning black football than to keep fellow travelers who permit them to act out against blacks and other minorities. Obviously it is about right minded whites choosing one racist attitude over another.

 

[untermensche]

The game from the right is easy to see.

Anything that tries to break free from top down power structures is condemned and attacked.

Democracy itself is attacked.

 

[dismal]

This protest was successful mainly because the black football players and others stood in solidarity.

That is what the right hates more than anything.

Blacks in solidarity effecting change. Any change that isn't top down.

They are supposed to beg for change on their knees.

Well then the right should be more consistent in their likes and actions. They really like blacks who can play winning football and they kinda like being able to dump on blacks whenever they want. Notice the imbalance? Rightists would rather have winning black football than to keep fellow travelers who permit them to act out against blacks and other minorities. Obviously it is about right minded whites choosing one racist attitude over another.

What does "the right" have to do with antics at college campuses?

This seems to be a squabble between the idealistic 1960's left that still believes in principles like free speech and the 1990's left that has been raised to see themselves as special snowflakes who can't handle hurtful things.

 

[untermensche]

Well then the right should be more consistent in their likes and actions. They really like blacks who can play winning football and they kinda like being able to dump on blacks whenever they want. Notice the imbalance? Rightists would rather have winning black football than to keep fellow travelers who permit them to act out against blacks and other minorities. Obviously it is about right minded whites choosing one racist attitude over another.

What does "the right" have to do with antics at college campuses?

This seems to be a squabble between the idealistic 1960's left that still believes in principles like free speech and the 1990's left that has been raised to see themselves as special snowflakes who can't handle hurtful things.

Give a real world example. Pertinent to this thread.

 

[Derec]

The game from the right is easy to see.

Anything that tries to break free from top down power structures is condemned and attacked.

Democracy itself is attacked.

A small but vocal minority calling the shots is the very antithesis of democracy. The only reason you support these radical student is that you happen to agree with their brand of radicalism.

 

[maxparrish]

Another day another insane whine from the right.

This thread is devoid of one fact.

Another day, another instance of the Left whining about supposed whining when they run out of actual arguments (which happens quite fast). Classic projection.

Nice.

 

[untermensche]

The game from the right is easy to see.

Anything that tries to break free from top down power structures is condemned and attacked.

Democracy itself is attacked.

A small but vocal minority calling the shots is the very antithesis of democracy. The only reason you support these radical student is that you happen to agree with their brand of radicalism.

He must have agreed with this minority.

They had no power to remove him.

And people expressing concerns is one aspect of what a functioning democracy looks like.

But there are always thugs that want to shut down people expressing concerns and call that democracy.

- - - Updated - - -

Another day, another instance of the Left whining about supposed whining when they run out of actual arguments (which happens quite fast). Classic projection.

Nice.

What would be nice would be ONE fact.

We know the right hates uppity blacks.

That isn't news.

 

[Trausti]

What would be nice would be ONE fact.

We know the right hates uppity blacks.

That isn't news.

Nah. It's the Left that hates uppity blacks. See this forum discussing Ben Carson.

 

[dismal]

What does "the right" have to do with antics at college campuses?

This seems to be a squabble between the idealistic 1960's left that still believes in principles like free speech and the 1990's left that has been raised to see themselves as special snowflakes who can't handle hurtful things.

Give a real world example. Pertinent to this thread.

Huh? My point was that the incidents being discussed in this thread are examples.

Or are you suggesting the Yale students or the Yale professors they are yelling at are from "the right"?

Or are you saying Yale is not part of the "real world"?

 

[untermensche]

What would be nice would be ONE fact.

We know the right hates uppity blacks.

That isn't news.

Nah. It's the Left that hates uppity blacks. See this forum discussing Ben Carson.

Is the thread the expression of the left in general?

I recall Bernie Sanders coming to Dr Carsons defense.

What Republican has supported the black students in Missouri?