No straw. Many posters at TFT are clearly far more tolerant of Islam than of Christianity.
Because one is an American minority. That is seriously the main reason. Rather silly, I agree.
No straw. Many posters at TFT are clearly far more tolerant of Islam than of Christianity.
Claptrap squared. There is much more bigoted and racially motivated criticism of Islam at TFT than Christianity on TFT (at least in my opinion), and that is what drives any perceived difference in attitudes.No straw. Many posters at TFT are clearly far more tolerant of Islam than of Christianity.
Because one is an American minority. That is seriously the main reason. Rather silly, I agree.
I don't exactly get a warm fuzzy feeling seeing flags with an assault rifle on them. Or that photo of a very young child carrying a picket that reads, "FOR WORLD PEACE ISRAEL MUST BE DESTROYED".
Not that Christians don't use kids in the same way - I am merely questioning the reasoning behind giving one religious group a pass and condemning another.
Irish gave us whiskey and Guinness. The only drink muzzies promote are Molotov cocktails.
What I don't get here is: why is some religious nuttery seemingly perfectly acceptable to users here while other religious nuttery is (rightfully) slammed?
I don't exactly get a warm fuzzy feeling seeing flags with an assault rifle on them. Or that photo of a very young child carrying a picket that reads, "FOR WORLD PEACE ISRAEL MUST BE DESTROYED".
Straw man. None of us have warm fuzzies for those people. We do however object to bigotry and smearing of innocent people.
No straw. Many posters at TFT are clearly far more tolerant of Islam than of Christianity.
Claptrap squared. There is much more bigoted and racially motivated criticism of Islam at TFT than Christianity on TFT (at least in my opinion), and that is what drives any perceived difference in attitudes.No straw. Many posters at TFT are clearly far more tolerant of Islam than of Christianity.
Because one is an American minority. That is seriously the main reason. Rather silly, I agree.
I don't exactly get a warm fuzzy feeling seeing flags with an assault rifle on them. Or that photo of a very young child carrying a picket that reads, "FOR WORLD PEACE ISRAEL MUST BE DESTROYED".
I doubt anybody here does.
Not that Christians don't use kids in the same way - I am merely questioning the reasoning behind giving one religious group a pass and condemning another.
Family that runs the store up the street "gets a pass" from me because they aren't doing the stuff you list in your initial statement.
Irish gave us whiskey and Guinness. The only drink muzzies promote are Molotov cocktails.
You never heard of rakı? You're missing out bigtime.
Posters here live in the West, for the most part, so Islam doesn't affect their lives in any real way while Christianity does.
The intolerance of Christianity is personal towards them because they grew up in repressive Christian environments or Christians are actively working to limit their rights and freedoms. Islam is also dumb and repressive, but not in a way that personally affects them so it's more of a generic being against it with no real emotion attached.
You don't know very many Muslims. There are gradations of Muslims, just like there are gradations of Catholics, Christians, etc.....Irish gave us whiskey and Guinness. The only drink muzzies promote are Molotov cocktails.
You never heard of rakı? You're missing out bigtime.
I had rakija, is it at all related? In any case Muslims do not drink that if they are practicing.
You do not think Islam is not actively working to limit people's rights and freedoms?
And besides, could you imagine your prime minister giving a Christian terrorist ten million dollars?
I'd love to see that explained.What I don't get here is: why is some religious nuttery seemingly perfectly acceptable to users here while other religious nuttery is (rightfully) slammed?
I don't exactly get a warm fuzzy feeling seeing flags with an assault rifle on them. Or that photo of a very young child carrying a picket that reads, "FOR WORLD PEACE ISRAEL MUST BE DESTROYED".
Straw man. None of us have warm fuzzies for those people. We do however object to bigotry and smearing of innocent people.
No straw. Many posters at TFT are clearly far more tolerant of Islam than of Christianity.
I'd love to see that explained.No straw. Many posters at TFT are clearly far more tolerant of Islam than of Christianity.
We aren't pissing our pants over Halal food standards, much like we don't piss ourselves over Kosher, or Ramadan like we don't Lent?
There is "more" criticism of Christianity in the US because of the attempts of Dominionizing the nation through the Government (see Wendy Davis... or the upcoming Roe v Wade reversal). Islam doesn't have that level of control in the US, and repeated attempts to show how Islam is endangering the US is just incredibly dumb as Muslims lack any force of authority in the US. If they ever become more than a minority (impossible seeing that a good deal of population growth is among Christians from South of the Border), there will be push back. Oddly enough, the issues we are told we'd see with Islam are pretty much in line with what we are seeing from the Christian Dominionists already (lack of rights for minorities, lack of tolerance).
I guess my problem is that I worry just as much about people the world over as I do for people in my own country.
I'd make a very shitty POTUS, because I don't care about the welfare of the American people any more than I do about any other people in any other nation. I don't care more about what affects me than I do about what affects people on the other side of the planet.
You do not think Islam is not actively working to limit people's rights and freedoms?
And besides, could you imagine your prime minister giving a Christian terrorist ten million dollars?
Of course it is, but not the rights and freedoms of anyone directly affecting me or most people in Western society, which was the point. You also needed to directly edit out that point when you quoted my post in order to pretend that I didn't make it or something, so good job with that.
Also, yes. If the Canadian government directly supported a hostile foreign power in abusing the rights of a Canadian Christian terrorist instead of standing up and fighting for him to be treated in accordance with the laws and freedoms which applied to him then I'd expect my Prime Minister to offer him compensation for the government's failure to do it's job. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms doesn't only apply to citizens we like and support, but to all of us.