• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Clothing

Clothing | Museo Archeologico dell’Alto Adige
The clothing was practical and functional. Ötzi’s clothing was made from hide, leather and braided grass, affording him protection from the cold and wet.

...
His clothing was made solely from leather, hide and braided grass. It was stitched together with animal sinews, grass fibres and tree bast. No wool or woven textile was found.
This is rather curious, given the dates of fiber sources.
  • Flax domesticated: Fertile Crescent: 7,000 BCE
  • Cotton domesticated: Upper Nile, Indus Valley: 5,000 BCE
  • Sheep bred for wool: Iran: 6,000 BCE
Ötzi’s hide coat reached almost down to his knees, covering his upper body and thighs. The coat was made from light and dark strips of goat and sheep hide stitched together with animal sinews. Ötzi wore the coat with the fur on the outside. Unfortunately, the sleeves did not survive. Since no recognisable fasteners were found, the coat was probably held closed with a belt. The coat had been in use for a long time, because the inside was very dirty, and some torn seams had been repaired with grass fibres – probably by Ötzi himself.

...
Ötzi’s “trousers” consisted of two separate leggings approx. 65 cm in length. They were made from strips of domestic goat and sheep hide. The tops of the leggings were reinforced with leather strips and were knotted onto the belt with an additional leather strip. At the bottom of the leggings were loops that were fastened to the shoes. The leggings had been worn for some time and had been repaired in several places.

...
Ötzi wore a loincloth made from narrow strips of sheep hide stitched together. It was originally a 100 x 33 cm piece of hide worn between the legs and fastened with the belt.

...
The belt consisted of a calfskin strip 4 to 5 cm wide.

...
This belt pouch contained tinder fungus, a scraper, a boring tool, a bone awl and a flint flake.

...
The shoes are made up of several layers. The inner shoe consists of string netting made from lime tree bast. Dry grass was stuffed under the netting for insulation. The outer shoe was made from deer hide and was stitched onto the sole like the netting. The sole was worn with the fur on the inside. The shoe was tied onto the foot with bast string.

...
A bearskin cap was uncovered during the archaeologic excavation. Pieces of bearskin had been stitched together to form a hemispherical shape. A chin strap held the cap in place.
He seems very well-dressed.
He was wondering around alpine passes. If he hadn't been well dressed he would have died of hypothermia, and nobody would have needed to go to the effort of murdering him.
 
I was thinking of doing a history of various types of clothing, but that would require a *lot* of work. People have been wearing shirtlike, dresslike, skirtlike, and pantslike clothing for millennia, and what I'd be interested in is trends in clothing types.

 Hemline - the lower edge of a dress or skirt. Since the Middle Ages, most Western women had worn ankle-length or floor-length skirts and dresses, at least most middle-class and upper-class women -  History of Western fashion

But in the 1920's, knee-length skirts and dresses became common, usually a little above or a little below the knee, and in the 1960's, miniskirts and minidresses became common.

From Wikipedia: "From World War I to roughly 1970, women were under social pressure to wear skirts near to the currently fashionable length or be considered unstylish, but since the 1970s, women's options have widened, and there is no longer really only one single fashionable skirt-length at a time. "

Meaning that women felt much more free to choose the lengths of the skirts and dresses that they wanted to wear.

This seems to be that assertion's source:

Hemline (skirt height) overview chart 1805-2005 - Hemline - Wikipedia
An abstract conceptual overview graph of changes in hemline heights (skirt lengths) in middle- and upper-class western women's clothes over two hundred years (1805-2005). The curve in this image is not based on exact numerical data, but instead presents a summary of broad general trends (i.e. the graph is more qualitative than quantitative, or "not to precise scale"). Before World War I, the hemlines of middle- and upper-class adult women's ordinary public clothes in western societies had varied only between floor length and an inch or two above ankle length (at most) for centuries. This graph shows how things then changed in a previously-unprecedented way. On the left, hemline height is indicated as being at ankle length (or slightly above) at the chronological start date of 1805 (i.e. 200 years before the date the first version of this chart was made), then dropping to floor-length ca. 1835, where it stayed for most of the remainder of the 19th century (with a few temporary excursions back to ankle-length -- see File:1794-1887-Fashion-overview-Alfred-Roller.GIF). During WW1, hemlines rose far above ankle-length relatively quickly -- and then in the mid 1920's (after a brief dip) rose almost all the way to knee length. During the period from the early 1930's to the mid 1960's, hemlines fluctuated in a zone which was quite different from the zone where hemlines had fluctuated during the 19th century. In the late 1960's, hemlines rose significantly above knee length for the first time. In the early 1970's, some women stayed with the miniskirt, some women went to the other extreme of ankle-length "granny dresses", while fashion designers tried to push an intermediate "midi" skirt length (see illustrations from September 1971 issue of Women's Wear Daily on p. 473 of Survey of Historic Costume ISBN 1-56367-142-5). The strong rejection by women of the attempt to impose the "midi" as the new norm marked the end of only one skirt-length at a time -- while fashion trends continued to come and go, from the 1970's on it was no longer true that a woman had to wear one particular socially-predominating skirt-length or be considered almost hopelessly unstylish. Instead, a variety of skirt-lengths now became acceptable (though after the early 1970's, the miniskirt itself didn't return as a mainstream fashion until the mid-1980's) -- and of course, in many contexts women are free to wear trousers instead of a skirt or dress. This era of relative fashion freedom is shown as the dispersed grey area on the right of the chart.
So it's likely for the Western world, or only for the US. But it's interesting that the midiskirt was a flop as a promoted fashion trend, even if many women liked wearing that length of skirt and dress -- many women also liked wearing other lengths, and they didn't let that promotion stop them.

 Women's Wear Daily - founded in 1910, and it still exists: WWD – Women's Wear Daily brings you breaking news about the fashion industry, designers, celebrity trend setters, and extensive coverage of fashion week.
 
I was thinking of doing a history of various types of clothing, but that would require a *lot* of work. People have been wearing shirtlike, dresslike, skirtlike, and pantslike clothing for millennia, and what I'd be interested in is trends in clothing types.

 Hemline - the lower edge of a dress or skirt. Since the Middle Ages, most Western women had worn ankle-length or floor-length skirts and dresses, at least most middle-class and upper-class women -  History of Western fashion

But in the 1920's, knee-length skirts and dresses became common, usually a little above or a little below the knee, and in the 1960's, miniskirts and minidresses became common.

From Wikipedia: "From World War I to roughly 1970, women were under social pressure to wear skirts near to the currently fashionable length or be considered unstylish, but since the 1970s, women's options have widened, and there is no longer really only one single fashionable skirt-length at a time. "

Meaning that women felt much more free to choose the lengths of the skirts and dresses that they wanted to wear.

This seems to be that assertion's source:

Hemline (skirt height) overview chart 1805-2005 - Hemline - Wikipedia
An abstract conceptual overview graph of changes in hemline heights (skirt lengths) in middle- and upper-class western women's clothes over two hundred years (1805-2005). The curve in this image is not based on exact numerical data, but instead presents a summary of broad general trends (i.e. the graph is more qualitative than quantitative, or "not to precise scale"). Before World War I, the hemlines of middle- and upper-class adult women's ordinary public clothes in western societies had varied only between floor length and an inch or two above ankle length (at most) for centuries. This graph shows how things then changed in a previously-unprecedented way. On the left, hemline height is indicated as being at ankle length (or slightly above) at the chronological start date of 1805 (i.e. 200 years before the date the first version of this chart was made), then dropping to floor-length ca. 1835, where it stayed for most of the remainder of the 19th century (with a few temporary excursions back to ankle-length -- see File:1794-1887-Fashion-overview-Alfred-Roller.GIF). During WW1, hemlines rose far above ankle-length relatively quickly -- and then in the mid 1920's (after a brief dip) rose almost all the way to knee length. During the period from the early 1930's to the mid 1960's, hemlines fluctuated in a zone which was quite different from the zone where hemlines had fluctuated during the 19th century. In the late 1960's, hemlines rose significantly above knee length for the first time. In the early 1970's, some women stayed with the miniskirt, some women went to the other extreme of ankle-length "granny dresses", while fashion designers tried to push an intermediate "midi" skirt length (see illustrations from September 1971 issue of Women's Wear Daily on p. 473 of Survey of Historic Costume ISBN 1-56367-142-5). The strong rejection by women of the attempt to impose the "midi" as the new norm marked the end of only one skirt-length at a time -- while fashion trends continued to come and go, from the 1970's on it was no longer true that a woman had to wear one particular socially-predominating skirt-length or be considered almost hopelessly unstylish. Instead, a variety of skirt-lengths now became acceptable (though after the early 1970's, the miniskirt itself didn't return as a mainstream fashion until the mid-1980's) -- and of course, in many contexts women are free to wear trousers instead of a skirt or dress. This era of relative fashion freedom is shown as the dispersed grey area on the right of the chart.
Rather subjective, and likely for the Western world, or only for the US.

 Women's Wear Daily - founded in 1910, and it still exists: WWD – Women's Wear Daily brings you breaking news about the fashion industry, designers, celebrity trend setters, and extensive coverage of fashion week.
Before the industrial revolution, clothes that extended expensive and difficult to clean fabrics close to the ground were a fashion choice that showed off the wearer's freedom from hard labour, or dirty environments. That applies to both women's hemlines and men's trousers - indeed, the very idea of fashion being a thing for women more than for men is a recent invention.

In the pre-industrial West, wealthy men were more prone to wear impractical clothes with expensive dyes and complex cuts and fits. This fashion seems to have been curtailed by the Great War, when military uniforms and plain civilian suits became the order of the day, and men's fashion has never recovered the complexity and variety it exhibited before the war.

When King Charles (then Prince Charles) married Diana Spencer, the newspapers wasted vast numbers of column inches on what she wore, and barely mentioned his clothes at all (he wore his Royal Navy uniform). By contrast, when Queen Victoria married Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg Gotha, the newspapers wasted approximately equal space in descriptions of both their outfits. Had he worn a military uniform, it would have been considered quite odd.

In Albert's time (and for at least a dozen centuries prior), fashions in trouser leg length for men were as volatile and complex as women's hemlines have become since, from the extremely short breeches worn in Elizabeth I's court, to the below the knee style Albert rocked at his royal wedding three centuries later.

Trousers in England basically started below the knee in the Eleventh century court of William the Bastard, slowly became shorter and shorter, showing off increasingly expensive and delicate hosiery, to reach absurd heights in the late sixteenth century, and then descended rapidly below the knee, and getting steadily longer until the start of the Twentieth century.

Men's fashion in the West since the early Twentieth century has been so consistently boring and uniform (in many ways literally uniform) that we often disregard it entirely, and think of fashion as mainly a feminine subject. But that certainly wasn't the case historically.
 
 Trousers as women's clothing - Wikipedia's contributors use  Trousers as their main word, and not "pants".

In the ancient Greco-Roman world, pants were considered some weird barbarian sort of clothing. So instead of toga parties, did any ancient Romans have pants parties? :D

Women wearing trousers/pants has become more and more acceptable over the last century in the Western world, to the point that many women almost exclusively wear them as their visible lower garment. I don't know if anyone has tried to estimate numbers for this trend.
 
Back
Top Bottom