marc
Veteran Member
being startled may excuse one shot in a sensitive gun (which shouldn't be the case for police), but this guy shot twice.
Why in the hell was his gun drawn in the first place?!It's an added safety feature to make sure that the trigger is only pulled when the person pulling the trigger wants it to be pulled, as obviously happened in this case.
It still won't save you from an accidental shot when startled.
Why in the hell was his gun drawn in the first place?!It still won't save you from an accidental shot when startled.
Why in the hell was his gun drawn in the first place?!
Dude, the guy was crawling out of a crashed car. There were a lot of sharp pieces of metal and glass within easy arms' reach which he could have picked up and stabbed the cop with. It would have been suicide to go in without his gun drawn.
Afraid not. {snip} I disagree with the D.A.
Afraid not. {snip} I disagree with the D.A.
Did you read the "lay" report ?
Did you read the "lay" report ?
My response was to the "lay" report.
Afraid not. {snip} I disagree with the D.A.
Did you read the "lay" report ?
being startled may excuse one shot in a sensitive gun (which shouldn't be the case for police), but this guy shot twice.
Why in the hell was his gun drawn in the first place?!It still won't save you from an accidental shot when startled.
Huh? The report I read said once--and that the failure to shoot twice as their training dictated was suggestive of it being an accident.
Huh? The report I read said once--and that the failure to shoot twice as their training dictated was suggestive of it being an accident.
Looking at the gun in the video I saw two discharges.
Look like Officer (uncle) Feaster may be in some hot water after all.
http://www.krcrtv.com/news/local/man-shot-by-paradise-police-officer-dies/37050562
And so much for people only protest when black people are shot.
Looking at the gun in the video I saw two discharges.
Optical illusion.
Do you have a problem with the fact that many protest the way African-Americans are treated by police?
What exactly is wrong with it?
What a load of self-serving bullshit.
the lay report said:The investigators were clear in their collection of the evidence in this case that the officer did not purposely or intentionally fire his pistol. Some in the public will never accept that conclusion, but as explained in the legal research portion of the report –without being able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a conscious, intentional, willful pulling of the trigger – there are no criminal charges that can be filed under California law for the negligent discharge of a weapon resulting in injury, no matter how horrible, as long as there is not a death and in this case the driver was not killed by the gun shot