I would think most employers woudn't be too worried about hiring someone who went to jail for beating their daughter's rapist. It's not the sort of thing likely to lead to additional crime.
Sure they would. The record says 'Assault occasioning Grievous Bodily Harm' not 'Beat his daughter's rapist'.
How would an employer come to know the circumstances of the assault? In the very unlikely event that they bothered to proceed to interview, why would they believe a convict's excuses for why he shouldn't have his crime taken into account?
If instead of answering "yes" to have you ever been convicted they list "convicted of beating my daughter's rapist".
- - - Updated - - -
I would think most employers woudn't be too worried about hiring someone who went to jail for beating their daughter's rapist. It's not the sort of thing likely to lead to additional crime.
Not so. I was on Hiring Committee for Google when I worked there, and have hired literally thousands of people over the years. Most companies use external background check agencies nowadays, and the criteria is binary:- if felony, don't even interview.
So they do a background check before the first interview??