• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Decline of the Western World

Average dwelling size in China - 448.8 square feet
Average dwelling size in US - 2,233 square feet
And note the quality of said dwellings. Most of the private dwellings that I have been in in China clearly have no insulation in the walls. There's a lot of thermal mass to average things out but that's all.

Motor vehicles per 1000 people in China - 231
Motor vehicles per 1000 people in US - 900
I don't consider this an automatic win for the US. Much of our time in China has been in Shanghai. Virtually always foot + subway beats car. Cars shield you from the elements better and are good for cargo. Locals tend to do bicycle + subway + foot which does even better. If I were to live in a city like that I would absolutely not want a car.

And something your list does not capture--I trust the US product far, far more than the Chinese product. Even if it's an "identical" product--what's in the market in China very well might be the quality control rejects from what's exported.
Motor vehicles per 1000 people in Manhattan - 200

;)
And still far too high. There is very little reason to use a motor vehicle in Manhattan, where I live. The extensive subway system is basically reliable and efficient, despite chronic money problems, there are tons of buses, and bike lanes all over the place. Plus, you can WALK. When I lived on the Upper East Side, during clement weather I’d walk five miles south and then five miles north back again, almost every day. Granted not everyone can do this, but those that can, should. It’s not only better for the environment but better for your own mental and physical health.

The cyclists do present a problem, though, The proliferation of bike lanes has brought forth a huge number of cyclists who have no regard for traffic signals and frequently hit pedestrians who have the right of way.
 
This was the grave mistake made during Clinton years that will soon cost all of us our way of life.
Who was NAFTA negotiated by?


North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) | Definition ...


NAFTA was negotiated by the administrations of U.S. Pres. George H.W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, and Mexican Pres. Carlos Salinas de Gortari.Aug 14, 2024
HW Bush in Aug. 2024? He'd been dead for 5.5 years.
 

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA /ˈnæftə/ NAF-tə; Spanish: Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte, TLCAN; French: Accord de libre-échange nord-américain, ALÉNA) was an agreement signed by Canada, Mexico, and the United States that created a trilateral trade bloc in North America. The agreement came into force on January 1, 1994, and superseded the 1988 Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement between the United States and Canada. The NAFTA trade bloc formed one of the largest trade blocs in the world by gross domestic product.

The impetus for a North American free trade zone began with U.S. president Ronald Reagan, who made the idea part of his 1980 presidential campaign. After the signing of the Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement in 1988, the administrations of U.S. president George H. W. Bush, Mexican President Carlos Salinas de Gortari, and Canadian prime minister Brian Mulroney agreed to negotiate what became NAFTA. Each submitted the agreement for ratification in their respective capitals in December 1992, but NAFTA faced significant opposition in both the United States and Canada. All three countries ratified NAFTA in 1993 after the addition of two side agreements, the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC) and the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC)


The impetus for a North American free trade zone began with U.S. president Ronald Reagan, who made the idea part of his 1980 presidential campaign. After the signing of the Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement in 1988, the administrations of U.S. president George H. W. Bush, Mexican President Carlos Salinas de Gortari, and Canadian prime minister Brian Mulroney agreed to negotiate what became NAFTA. Each submitted the agreement for ratification in their respective capitals in December 1992, but NAFTA faced significant opposition in both the United States and Canada. All three countries ratified NAFTA in 1993 after the addition of two side agreements, the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC) and the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC).

Passage of NAFTA resulted in the elimination or reduction of barriers to trade and investment between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The effects of the agreement regarding issues such as employment, the environment, and economic growth have been the subject of political disputes. Most economic analyses indicated that NAFTA was beneficial to the North American economies and the average citizen,[2][3][4] but harmed a small minority of workers in industries exposed to trade competition.[5][6] Economists held that withdrawing from NAFTA or renegotiating NAFTA in a way that reestablished trade barriers would have adversely affected the U.S. economy and cost jobs.[7][8][9] However, Mexico would have been much more severely affected by job loss and reduction of economic growth in both the short term and long term.[10]
 
This was the grave mistake made during Clinton years that will soon cost all of us our way of life.
Who was NAFTA negotiated by?


North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) | Definition ...


NAFTA was negotiated by the administrations of U.S. Pres. George H.W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, and Mexican Pres. Carlos Salinas de Gortari.Aug 14, 2024
HW Bush in Aug. 2024? He'd been dead for 5.5 years.
That's when the article was written.
 
I've been inside a semi-ghost mall.
I have been to Sears too.
I said "mall". Not a failing business, a mall that never got off the ground. Virtually all the occupancy was in the prime spaces, everything else was untouched. They built a mall they couldn't get tenants for.
Why does it have to be a mall? A mall is a business, Sears was too. I remember Circuit City built new near Best Buy both on the same main road essentially. But in case of Circuit City entrance was from minor road which intersected main one.
It had been a desert for a couple of years until it closed.
Sometimes things just not meant to live.
 
Last edited:
I've been inside a semi-ghost mall.
I have been to Sears too.
I said "mall". Not a failing business, a mall that never got off the ground. Virtually all the occupancy was in the prime spaces, everything else was untouched. They built a mall they couldn't get tenants for.
Why does it have to be a mall? A mall is a business, Sears was too. I remember Circuit City built new near Best Buy both on the same main road essentially. But in case of Circuit City entrance was from minor road which intersected main one.
It had been a desert for a couple of years until it closed.
Sometimes things just not meant to live.
Circuit City and Best Buy in Russia?


Best Buy is alive and well.

Suburban shopping malls led to a decline of inner city businesses.

Suburban shopping malls declined due to online shopping and delivery.

Some call that capitalism, free markets, and progress.
 
Back
Top Bottom