‘Family values’ conservative: If women can breastfeed in public, I can grab their breasts

[RavenSky]

These are the fucktards that are in charge of our lawmaking.

Currently in New Hampshire, it is legal for both men and women to expose their nipples in public, but a state bill would make it a misdemeanor for women to expose their nipples, even for breastfeeding. The bill is backed solely by Republican men.

http://deadstate.org/family-values-...reastfeed-in-public-i-can-grab-their-breasts/

To be clear, the bill actually makes an exemption for breast-feeding. It is currently legal in New Hampshire for both men and women to be topless. This law is trying to target women only to cover up. "Family values" and all that...

In support of the discrimantory bill, New Hampshire state representative Josh Moore says:

If it’s a woman’s natural inclination to pull her nipple out in public and you support that, than you should have no problem with a mans inclnantion to stare at it and grab it.

I'm sure he'd then have no problem with said woman shooting him for his assault, right?

How the fuck do these ignorant assholes get elected????

 

[Nice Squirrel]

Does the same supply to his whipping out his dick to whiz in the woods? Can any man just grab and yank on it?

 

[Terrell]

Does the same supply to his whipping out his dick to whiz in the woods? Can any man just grab and yank on it?

Public urination is illegal in some places. I doubt that it's legal to fap in public anywhere in the U.S.

 

[abaddon]

How the fuck do these ignorant assholes get elected????

They’re elected by members of a species that numbers well over 6 billion ignorant assholes.

Does the same supply to his whipping out his dick to whiz in the woods? Can any man just grab and yank on it?

If he thought his dick presented a temptation to other men then he'd be vocal about that too. This is “don’t present the temptation or bad things are bound to happen” thinking.

 

[ZiprHead]

How the fuck do these ignorant assholes get elected????

How do they have the mental capacity to get out of bed in the morning?

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

A snippet from the bill:

(b) Such person purposely exposes his or her anus or, if a woman, purposely exposes the areola or nipple of her breast or breasts in a public place and in the presence of another person with reckless disregard for whether a reasonable person would be offended or alarmed by such act.

So what's he want to do if a guy exposes his anus?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

(b) Such person purposely exposes his or her anus or, if a woman, purposely exposes the areola or nipple of her breast or breasts in a public place and in the presence of another person with reckless disregard for whether a reasonable person would be offended or alarmed by such act.

Reckless disregard?! Alarmed?!

Illegal
Person A: *Whips out anus*
Person B: *Alarmed!*

Legal
Person A: Do you mind if I whip out my anus?
Persons B, C, D : No, not really.
Person A: *Whips out anus*

 

[hurtinbuckaroo]

Does the same supply to his whipping out his dick to whiz in the woods? Can any man just grab and yank on it?

No, I think only congressmen would be allowed to grab, and only senators are allowed to yank.

 

[Nice Squirrel]

A snippet from the bill:

(b) Such person purposely exposes his or her anus or, if a woman, purposely exposes the areola or nipple of her breast or breasts in a public place and in the presence of another person with reckless disregard for whether a reasonable person would be offended or alarmed by such act.

So what's he want to do if a guy exposes his anus?

He's after the gheys. Because they buttsechs everyone they meet and whippping out the dark eye is the gateway to buttsechs.

 

[Bronzeage]

They’re elected by members of a species that numbers well over 6 billion ignorant assholes.

Does the same supply to his whipping out his dick to whiz in the woods? Can any man just grab and yank on it?

If he thought his dick presented a temptation to other men then he'd be vocal about that too. This is “don’t present the temptation or bad things are bound to happen” thinking.

A totally unrelated and probably bogus story about temptation:
My uncle was drafted in 1960. Many years later, he related a bizarre incident from his early days in the military. He had been in the Army about two days. At this point, all they had done was receive their uniforms and boots and spent the rest of the time waiting. They were standing around a yard, waiting for someone to tell them to do something. One new draftee was walking from man to man, asking if he could suck their cock. Up to that point, everyone told him to get away from them, or a stronger threat. Homosexual behavior was a serious offense and everyone assumed this guy just wanted out of the Army, the fastest way possible.

Finally, a soldier said, "Sure. Go at it," and dropped his pants. Instead of dropping to his knees, he grabbed the man's penis and started to run, screaming at the top of his lungs. The Captain's office overlooked the yard and he overlooked the sight of two of his men in fatigues, running in a big circle, one holding the other's penis, while the other tried to run and hold his pants up.

My uncle said he never saw either of them again.

 

[whichphilosophy]

These are the fucktards that are in charge of our lawmaking.

http://deadstate.org/family-values-...reastfeed-in-public-i-can-grab-their-breasts/

To be clear, the bill actually makes an exemption for breast-feeding. It is currently legal in New Hampshire for both men and women to be topless. This law is trying to target women only to cover up. "Family values" and all that...

In support of the discrimantory bill, New Hampshire state representative Josh Moore says:

If it’s a woman’s natural inclination to pull her nipple out in public and you support that, than you should have no problem with a mans inclnantion to stare at it and grab it.

I'm sure he'd then have no problem with said woman shooting him for his assault, right?

How the fuck do these ignorant assholes get elected????

The irresponsible comments of the New Hampshire state representative Josh Moore suggest he has own mistakenly revealed repressed subconscious motives, wishes, or attitudes. No doubt this is a Freudian Slip.

 

[Keith&Co.]

(b) Such person purposely exposes his or her anus or, if a woman, purposely exposes the areola or nipple of her breast or breasts in a public place and in the presence of another person with reckless disregard for whether a reasonable person would be offended or alarmed by such act.

I know the wording is specific to my personal anus, but if I pantsed someone to expose their anus, would it be actionable against me for forcing their anus exposure?

And does this fear of anus mean I can't change a baby's diaper in public, either?

Now, don't get me wrong, those women that change diapers on the tables in the food court, I can see prosecuting that as a felony, but not all places have baby-friendly bathrooms. And while I've never done it in or near the food court, I have used the back of the Trooper, where technically sunlight does strike the little baby butthole. And I'm sure a passerby could tell what I was doing. And could conceivably be offenseivized.

But maybe the esteemed legislaturist isn't against women nearly as much as he's against babies? Can't feed them, can't change them. What's next, a spit-up misdemeanor?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

(b) Such person purposely exposes his or her anus or, if a woman, purposely exposes the areola or nipple of her breast or breasts in a public place and in the presence of another person with reckless disregard for whether a reasonable person would be offended or alarmed by such act.

I know the wording is specific to my personal anus, but if I pantsed someone to expose their anus, would it be actionable against me for forcing their anus exposure?

And does this fear of anus mean I can't change a baby's diaper in public, either?

Now, don't get me wrong, those women that change diapers on the tables in the food court, I can see prosecuting that as a felony, but not all places have baby-friendly bathrooms.

Agreed. This is why I always would change her at the register counter.

Me: Woah! Could you hand me a couple more napkins?

 

[Lion IRC]

...The irresponsible comments of the New Hampshire state representative Josh Moore suggest he has own mistakenly revealed repressed subconscious motives, wishes, or attitudes. No doubt this is a Freudian Slip.

No.
I think he is saying modesty in ones public attire goes hand in hand with the same moral code that condemns peeping toms. If a person isn't embarassed about displaying their body in public why would they object to someone else's inclination to perv at them thru binoculars?

Josh Moore said the "inclination" to stare and grab. And such inclination is presumably 'natural'. #born_that_way

 

[J842P]

The antipathy in the US to breast-feeding in public is something I have always found bizarre. My family comes from Guatemala, and over there it is a normal and mundane thing, and Guatemala is much more conservative society than you would typically find in America, even in Americas conservative regions. In urban areas women usually cover up while breast-feeding, but in the rural areas, especially with the Maya, bare-breasts are perfectly normal for a nursing mother with her child.

Is it America's Protestant, Puritan roots that is the source of this madness?

 

[Loren Pechtel]

The antipathy in the US to breast-feeding in public is something I have always found bizarre. My family comes from Guatemala, and over there it is a normal and mundane thing, and Guatemala is much more conservative society than you would typically find in America, even in Americas conservative regions. In urban areas women usually cover up while breast-feeding, but in the rural areas, especially with the Maya, bare-breasts are perfectly normal for a nursing mother with her child.

Is it America's Protestant, Puritan roots that is the source of this madness?

Yeah--I've seen a fair amount of open breastfeeding in China--yet the show we took her relatives to would have been illegal in China despite being simply 18+ here. I have never seen breastfeeding in public in the US.

 

[Draconis]

Not for the first time, I wonder how we got on before someone invented clothes. The sky must have fallen in at least daily with all that breastfeeding and all the rest mentioned above.

 

[RavenSky]

...The irresponsible comments of the New Hampshire state representative Josh Moore suggest he has own mistakenly revealed repressed subconscious motives, wishes, or attitudes. No doubt this is a Freudian Slip.

No.
I think he is saying modesty in ones public attire goes hand in hand with the same moral code that condemns peeping toms. If a person isn't embarassed about displaying their body in public why would they object to someone else's inclination to perv at them thru binoculars?

Josh Moore said the "inclination" to stare and grab. And such inclination is presumably 'natural'. #born_that_way

ummm no. Just no.

Here is his quote again:

If it’s a woman’s natural inclination to pull her nipple out in public and you support that, than you should have no problem with a mans inclination to stare at it and grab it.

Notice the word "and" before "grab it"

In no universe should a moral code suggest that any person has a right to place their hands on another person's body simply because they can see it. I don't care what body part it is.

Just because a woman is not "embarassed" [sic] to have her breasts bare does NOT mean she is inviting pervs to touch her; any more than a man without his top on is inviting others to give him a purple nurple

 

[fast]

Nm