Federal Investigators Execute Search Warrant at Rudy Giuliani’s Apartment

[Shadowy Man]

So, logically, if I have an adjective noun I must have a non-adjective noun, too?

You don't distinguish unless there are multiple options.

Maybe *you* don’t. But that’s not a rule I’ve ever heard.

That being said, I do understand where you are coming from. But, in the context of the actual image presented here, the point in putting the adjective is to distinguish between Clinton’s home and Giuliani’s home, not between multiple Clinton’s homes. To read it your way comes across as an extremely forced interpretation just to avoid the obvious one.

 

[ZiprHead]

 

[Toni]

So, logically, if I have an adjective noun I must have a non-adjective noun, too?

You don't distinguish unless there are multiple options.

The options in this case are: non-FBI raided and FBI raided. Can apply to the same residence and in this case, does.

 

[TV and credit cards]

You really have trouble with this humor thing.

Oftentimes, I find the ensuing discussion even more humorous. Like the humans trying to explain humor to a synthetic. Maybe it's intentional. Maybe it's not. I don't know. But I do enjoy it.

 

[TomC]

You really have trouble with this humor thing.

Oftentimes, I find the ensuing discussion even more humorous. Like the humans trying to explain humor to a synthetic. Maybe it's intentional. Maybe it's not. I don't know. But I do enjoy it.

It is kinda a guilty pleasure, innit? Like watching people argue about whether a cake is food or art?
Tom

 

[Rhea]

So, logically, if I have an adjective noun I must have a non-adjective noun, too?

You don't distinguish unless there are multiple options.

Right! Like, "just enjoying my non-COVID body" implies that I have a COVID body somewhere else!
language is fun!

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Weaponizing the DOJ against political opponents is a good step forward.

 

[untermensche]

Weaponizing the DOJ against political opponents is a good step forward.

Giuliani is not above the law because he worked for Trump.

He is likely a criminal though because he worked with Trump.

Trump surrounded himself with criminals.

 

[Trausti]

Weaponizing the DOJ against political opponents is a good step forward.

Giuliani should change his name to Hunter Biden.

 

[untermensche]

Weaponizing the DOJ against political opponents is a good step forward.

Giuliani should change his name to Hunter Biden.

Oh yeah.

That name was never politicized.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Weaponizing the DOJ against political opponents is a good step forward.

Giuliani is not above the law because he worked for Trump.

He is likely a criminal though because he worked with Trump.

Trump surrounded himself with criminals.

Do you have any idea what is the specific crime he may be accused of that led to this raid?

Are you, supposedly some sort of anti-establishment sort, cheering the DOJ?

 

[untermensche]

Weaponizing the DOJ against political opponents is a good step forward.

Giuliani is not above the law because he worked for Trump.

He is likely a criminal though because he worked with Trump.

Trump surrounded himself with criminals.

Do you have any idea what is the specific crime he may be accused of that led to this raid?

Are you, supposedly some sort of anti-establishment sort, cheering the DOJ?

Is the president's lying attorney that went to court with nothing trying to overturn elections not part of the establishment now?

When the DOJ goes after deserving members of the establishment I have no problem.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

So you are cheering the establishment. Good to know.

Do you like the band "Rage for the Machine"? They've got a hit called "Shilling in the name of" with a very catchy chorus of "F*** you I will do what they tell me".

 

[untermensche]

So you are cheering the establishment. Good to know.

Do you like the band "Rage for the Machine"? They've got a hit called "Shilling in the name of" with a very catchy chorus of "F*** you I will do what they tell me".

If you are supporting Giuliani you are cheering a total lying scumbag in the establishment that went to court to overturn elections with nothing.

Go (play your song) yourself.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

So you are cheering the establishment. Good to know.

Do you like the band "Rage for the Machine"? They've got a hit called "Shilling in the name of" with a very catchy chorus of "F*** you I will do what they tell me".

If you are supporting Giuliani you are cheering a total lying scumbag in the establishment that went to court to overturn elections with nothing.

I'm not the one cheering the establishment. You are.

You skipped my question about what crime in particular you think he is being investigated for.

Did the DOJ get their warrant under the "I know he did something bad so if you get me a warrant I can find out what it is" clause of getting a warrant under probable cause? Is that what you are cheering from your anti-establishment position?

Or do you think Giuliani was breaking the law by filing those lawsuits? To prove that all you need are the court filings, and the government already has those.

I think this is a good move for reasons very different from you thinking this is a good move. You are cheering your (establishment) team. I am cheering the masks coming off. Even yours.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Let’s not forget that a copy of “Hunter Biden’s hard drive” was in Giuliani’s “possession” and it contained very illegal images to possess on it.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Ah, now that might be something. It is more than unter has to offer.

 

[Coleman Smith]

HA HA HA

But I fear Elixir is likely right.

On the other hand, is he smart enough to empty the recycle bin? Even if he did unless he wiped the drive it's probably recoverable.

I have seen one case in which an expert testified that nothing was recoverable because the drive had been wiped.

The jury understood.

 

[crazyfingers]

HA HA HA

But I fear Elixir is likely right.

On the other hand, is he smart enough to empty the recycle bin? Even if he did unless he wiped the drive it's probably recoverable.

I have seen one case in which an expert testified that nothing was recoverable because the drive had been wiped.

The jury understood.

Hope that happens again

 

[untermensche]

So you are cheering the establishment. Good to know.

Do you like the band "Rage for the Machine"? They've got a hit called "Shilling in the name of" with a very catchy chorus of "F*** you I will do what they tell me".

If you are supporting Giuliani you are cheering a total lying scumbag in the establishment that went to court to overturn elections with nothing.

I'm not the one cheering the establishment. You are.

You skipped my question about what crime in particular you think he is being investigated for.

Did the DOJ get their warrant under the "I know he did something bad so if you get me a warrant I can find out what it is" clause of getting a warrant under probable cause? Is that what you are cheering from your anti-establishment position?

Or do you think Giuliani was breaking the law by filing those lawsuits? To prove that all you need are the court filings, and the government already has those.

I think this is a good move for reasons very different from you thinking this is a good move. You are cheering your (establishment) team. I am cheering the masks coming off. Even yours.

You will have to wait for the show you defender of the establishment.

But I love the coming attractions.