Exactly. Thank you for the acknowledgement. Please report to your nearest adult female for processing.
Yupp. heterosexual cis-males do not matter to that crowd, only PC-preferred groups like minorities, women, LGBTQABCDEFG etc.That was one reason they decided to make it gender neutral again, so as not to exclude transgender people.
This. What's "privileged" about having to have a special room to hide to avoid harassment?
Since there was a women only space but no corresponding men only space your apologetics does not hold water. If "old building" was an actual explanation you would expect it to have both kinds of space.Oh, for heaven's sake. This is said to be an old building, yes? Guess what, in old public buildings, men's lounges and women's lounges were quite common. I've worked on at least two historic public buildings from that era that had them. The idea that this is the result of modern political correctedness is absurd and stupid. What we have here is an old building that hasn't been updated, and people happen to like it. I wish I had the time to go around searching for ways to feel my ego was being affronted.
Yupp. heterosexual cis-males do not matter to that crowd, only PC-preferred groups like minorities, women, LGBTQABCDEFG etc.That was one reason they decided to make it gender neutral again, so as not to exclude transgender people.
Stop trying to make your silly redefinition of "SJW" and "snowflake" happen.Yes, these new SJW snowflakes really need to get a life.
This. What's "privileged" about having to have a special room to hide to avoid harassment?
The so-called "harassment" was male students sometimes engaging them in conversation. Oh the horrors!
Stop trying to make your silly redefinition of "SJW" and "snowflake" happen.Yes, these new SJW snowflakes really need to get a life.
![]()
It is hypersensitive SJW snowflakes like yourself you have tried to change the meaning of SJW into something silly, not me.Stop trying to make your silly redefinition of "SJW" and "snowflake" happen.Yes, these new SJW snowflakes really need to get a life.
The whole "harassment" angle seems bunk. In college, I don't ever remember any guys interrupting any study groups I participated in with women to talk to them. If people are studying, they are almost always left alone.
Furthermore, if one wants to study without any interruption, there is already a perfectly good spot for that: the library.
The whole "harassment" angle seems bunk. In college, I don't ever remember any guys interrupting any study groups I participated in with women to talk to them. If people are studying, they are almost always left alone.
Furthermore, if one wants to study without any interruption, there is already a perfectly good spot for that: the library.
I think you haven't been in a university library lately. There is a whole lotta social activity going on there. At least in some of them.
But back in the day, a dedicated asshole did not necessarily find a library much of a deterrent.
And if a guy isn't going to respect the rules, what makes one think he'll respect the "girls only" rule?
And if a guy isn't going to respect the rules, what makes one think he'll respect the "girls only" rule?
Therefore, we should not have any rules about anything whatsoever, because people won't respect them.
The whole "harassment" angle also sounds identical to the argument made by conservative Muslims on why men and women need to be separated in public: for the protection of the women, and how immoral it is for those in the West to "force" women to be around men in public when they may otherwise not want to be.
The far left and conservative Muslims seem to be coming full circle here.
Therefore, we should not have any rules about anything whatsoever, because people won't respect them.
No, you have a "no harassment" rule or you can reserve rooms where no outside interruptions are allowed. This does not mean you create a "girls only, no guys allowed" lounge.
How you twist words plainly written is a special skill set.
Stop trying to make your silly redefinition of "SJW" and "snowflake" happen.
![]()
<snip>, SJW really SHOULD apply just as much for conservatives as for liberals when they abandon logic and become self righteous and holier than thou about "social justice" shouldn't it? I can see examples of it on both sides.
Maybe allocating an additional room for men only would be one solution.
If only this solution came with an actual problem.