• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Floriduh...

ZiprHead

Loony Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
38,805
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Don't be a dick.

The Florida Democratic party would not exist if a new Senate bill is passed and signed into law.

Spring Hill Republican Senator Blaise Ingoglia has filed SB 1248, which would be called "The Ultimate Cancel Act."

While it does not mention the Democratic party's name, it would direct the Florida Division of Elections to "immediately cancel the filings of a political party, to include its registration and approved status as a political party, if the party’s platform has previously advocated for, or been in support of, slavery or involuntary servitude."
 
It’s a unconstitutional political ploy; and quite funny!
 
It might make a fabulous gift to the Florida Democratic Party though.

Get out and vote or those people are going to eliminate your choice completely.
One of the big problems the Dems have is that while a majority of voters lean towards them, they're drawn from low turnout demographics. Young people, black people, low income people, demographics that don't reliably vote at all.
"Keep Your Vote!" might make a great "get out the vote" campaign slogan.
Tom
 
FDR tried to expand the Supreme Court so he could pack it with judges who would not contest his agenda.

Boht sdes use the same tactics if they can get away with it.

More recently I believe it was democratic Gerrymandering in NY.

Jefferson observed polarization beginning right from the start.
 
How did Florida become a third world nation with a large theme park?
 
FDR tried to expand the Supreme Court so he could pack it with judges who would not contest his agenda.

Boht sdes use the same tactics if they can get away with it.

More recently I believe it was democratic Gerrymandering in NY.

Jefferson observed polarization beginning right from the start.
Fuck that! This isn't remotely similar. The GOP in FL is acting like it is trying to become a dictatorship.
 
Meatball is going to need more modifications than that to FL law.
For one thing, as a current office holder he is prohibited from seeking another office, like say, the Presidency.
 

The Florida Democratic party would not exist if a new Senate bill is passed and signed into law.

Spring Hill Republican Senator Blaise Ingoglia has filed SB 1248, which would be called "The Ultimate Cancel Act."

While it does not mention the Democratic party's name, it would direct the Florida Division of Elections to "immediately cancel the filings of a political party, to include its registration and approved status as a political party, if the party’s platform has previously advocated for, or been in support of, slavery or involuntary servitude."
Prohibiting abortion = involuntary servitude to the fetus. Ban the Republican Party!
 
Until 1864, both parties endorsed a platform allowing for slavery in the states that already practiced it, Florida included. So this would result in the cancellation of both major parties in Florida. The only valid remaining politicsl parties would therefore be the following minor parties recognized by the state:

Coalition With A Purpose Party
Conservative Party of Florida
Constitution Party of Florida
Ecology Party of Florida
Green Party of Florida
Independent Party of Florida
Libertarian Party of Florida
No Labels Party of Florida
Party for Socialism and Liberation - Florida
People's Party
Reform Party of Florida

Sounds like a setup for an interesting election to me.
 
Planned Parenthood advocates say the ‘absurd’ draft legislation regarding periods would present a ‘reductive and binary view of sex’
Florida lawmakers are considering a draft law to strengthen state control over sex education that its sponsor says would ban any instruction in schools about menstrual cycles before the sixth grade.

The proposal comes as Florida’s Republican-dominated legislature, backed by Governor Ron DeSantis, has already passed a raft of laws limiting discussion in schools of gender and sexuality and reducing the emphasis on diversity in public schools.


The latest proposal, from Republican Stan McClain, would allow instruction in “acquired immune deficiency syndrome, sexually transmitted diseases, or health education” only in grades six through 12, generally meaning for children aged 12 to 18.

McClain confirmed at a recent committee meeting that discussions about menstrual cycles would also be restricted to those grades.

Girls typically have their first periods between the ages of 10 and 15, but some do so as young as nine.

“Imagine a little girl in fourth grade, going to the bathroom and finding blood in her panties and thinking that she is dying,” state representative Ashley Gantt, a Democrat, said in a video posted on Instagram.

“She doesn’t actually know what’s going on. And her teacher does not even have the ability to tell her that this is a part of life.”

“So if little girls experience their menstrual cycle in 5th grade or 4th grade, will that prohibit conversations from them since they are in the grade lower than sixth grade?” asked Gantt.

“It would,” McClain responded.
 
Looks like a classic case of law of unintended consequences when a little thought (20 mins?) might have pointed out the possible problems.
 
Looks like a classic case of law of unintended consequences when a little thought (20 mins?) might have pointed out the possible problems.
Aah, my naïve friend, do you really think they care about the possible problems? ;) That's just icky girly stuff no one wants to know about.
 
Looks like a classic case of law of unintended consequences when a little thought (20 mins?) might have pointed out the possible problems.
Aah, my naïve friend, do you really think they care about the possible problems? ;) That's just icky girly stuff no one wants to know about.
If they are like Aust. pollies they get very nice wages so yes I would expect a modicum of thought. If this is beyond the obsolete grey matter of your pollies, what about their staff?
 
Disney’s anti-racism film Ruby Bridges is the subject of a complaint brought by a Florida parent who claims the movie is not appropriate for second-graders, because it might teach them that “white people hate Black people”.

The film, which tells the story of a six-year-old girl who integrated New Orleans schools in the 1960s, has been a staple of school curriculums during Black History Month in the state’s Tampa-area county of Pinellas.

The complaint over the film about Ruby Bridges, the first Black child to integrate into a white school, comes as parents across Florida have been granted greater powers over what their children are shown and taught in classrooms, including being given advance warning over “controversial” topics.
 
Hiding the past from children does not actually cancel its effects.

What do all these parents think their kids are going to do once they inevitably find out all the things their parents have been lying to them about? Say "thank you" and go on with the Elks Club meeting?
 
Hiding the past from children does not actually cancel its effects.

What do all these parents think their kids are going to do once they inevitably find out all the things their parents have been lying to them about? Say "thank you" and go on with the Elks Club meeting?
Well, parents do not disclose everything in family history for a number of reasons, including hoping to spare children their own childhood trauma. My father's mother died when he was 10 from breast cancer, something I did not know until I was about 30 and probably would still not know if I weren't home visiting at the same time my grandmother's sister in law (my father's aunt) was visiting. I have never been able to understand which was the forbidden word: breast or cancer. I imagine the combination was something that was just too much for either of my parents to bring up. Likewise some serious mental illness. It was really only when I was a young adult that the genetic link for breast cancer became well known (at least in small town/rural midwest among the less medically sophisticated population). My parents were 'protecting' me and my siblings from things that they were uncomfortable talking about and didn't fully understand themselves. I don't think that my parents were 'lying' to us about any of that. They were doing what they thought best to relieve us of a burden they very much suffered under: the health concerns of parents of both of my parents which kept their families impoverished. They wanted better which to them meant 'not wallowing in the past.' My parents never even discussed disparities in women's rights compared with men's rights and they very obviously and very vehemently wanted their daughters to have full access to academic and career opportunities that did not exist in for my parents' generation.

I only mention this because this is in its own small way a pretty decent parallel between what (some) parents and schools and communities do and do not want taught at school. Race, slavery, Jim Crow are all difficult subjects to discuss dispassionately. There was very little discussion of race relations, Civil rights, or slavery when I was a (very indifferent but still earning an A) student in history in high school. Some discussion of Jim Crow and Reconstruction but very, very cursory. Some how, I still managed to become what right wingers term a radical lefty and what leftwingers think is hopelessly middle of the road. I did grow up loathing the study of history with its emphasis on battles and wars and the almost entire lack of any mention of women or persons of color.

I sometimes think that people are not very aware of just how much K-12 education is expected to teach. Curriculum is very broad and about a mm deep. Which is not to say that schools could not and should not be doing a much better job of incorporating the contributions and struggles of everyone in our history who was not a white cis WASP male. Presenting a much more well rounded version of history (because history will always be rethought and more and different contexts will be brought to bear) is of course a good thing, and necessary.

Which is a very long winded way of saying that it is natural, if unhelpful for people to hope to spare their children the 'burden' of dealing with past traumas, whether they are traumas within the family or within our nation. It is an instinct that must be countered but also countered in ways that respect the ages and capacities of children to comprehend without being overwhelmed. First graders do not need to know that white masters raped enslaved women or that enslaved people were savagely beaten and worse. High schoolers probably do need to know that.
 
Which is a very long winded way of saying that it is natural, if unhelpful for people to hope to spare their children the 'burden' of dealing with past traumas, whether they are traumas within the family or within our nation.
I don't think there's anything "natural" about this very dangerous tendency. Observe that it is not the victims of trauma, but the perpetrators of trauma who are demanding our collective amnesia on their behalf. Why, if this is really about "protection"?
 
Back
Top Bottom