more accurately, "no asians" in this context is the sort of sexual preference that publicly announces that a given ethnic group has no value as human beings whatsoever - assuming that a particular trait carries over from straight male behavior to gay male behavior.So "no asians" is the sort of sexual preference that should be kept in the closet because it makes some people uncomfortable?
little diversion here to explain this:
it is a fact is that in the culture of humans, a woman's value *as a human being* is partly or largely based on how much men want to fuck her.
(this is an equality problem, because it's fine for your value as someone they others want to be fuck is based on whether others want to fuck you, but your value as an independent thinking entity being based on whether others want to fuck you is another thing entirely).
and the reality is that while women may not experience that from everyone they meet every day of their life, most of their existence is spent acutely feeling the fact that their worth as a fellow member of the species is judged solely on whether or not the men in the room want to stick their dick in her.
this is why there are a lot of issues with the sexualization of women and how things that might technically seem innocuous can be a major issue with regards to how women interact with society on a day to day basis.
i was curious about whether this was some gender dynamic thing between men and women, but after asking around to some gay folks i know and those adjacent to the gay community, the feedback i got is that this happens with gay men as well.
the interesting thing is how this causes a kind of self-perpetuating feedback loop, where gay men are both judging the value of other men's existence solely on if they want to fuck them, while also having the merits of their existence judged on whether others want to fuck them.
so in a cultural context where "how much i want to fuck you determines your worth as a human being" is a prominent factor, that can make "no asians" a subtextually broader statement than simply a qualifier for sexual preference.
Your post reminded me of something.
I played CounterStrike for over 15 years. Some of the maps in that game are hostage rescue missions, and one of the hostages looks Asian. About 6-7 years ago, people started making comments about the Asian hostage like he was of lesser value than the white ones, or that they wanted him to die, and occasionally making "jokes" about Asian character traits. At the time I thought it was a CounterStrike thing but now I wonder if hating on Asians was/is trending in internet culture. The servers I played on didn't allow players to use the N-word or call people fags, or say something bad is 'ghey'. But anti-Asian talk was allowed unless a Asian player objected.
I wonder if online anti-Asian bigotry has been getting a free pass because no one took it seriously.
No one is saying it's not possible to be racist against asians.
What they are saying is it's bigoted to assume someone with a "no asians" sexual preference is a racist or a psycho.
There could be asians with a "no asians" sexual preference. People like what they like.