I don't understand your point.
The news story says that two individuals under aliases uploaded blasphemous content in Pakistan, but the author never reports in the news story what the blasphemous content was - so, the readers are left to draw our own conclusions - and so the audience can only speculate that the content was somehow either offensive to nationalistic or tribal or sectarian or religious or ethnic sensibilities of specific communities or the general countrymen in Pakistan? And reporting specific tweets of Pakistani individuals I'm not sure makes whatever wider point you're trying to make either. For example, Madonna openly said in the Women's March that she has thoughts about bombing the White House, but no one took her literally. And Robert Di Nero said that he has wanted to punch President Trump but no one took that literally either. So, I'm not sure why we should take their words literally - all we can understand from their tweets is that they're outraged by whatever the content that was uploaded on WhatsApp (which they might or might not be aware of generally and are just reacting to rumors or news) - and they're typing of the worst possible scenario that can conceive of happening to the alleged offenders.
By the way, as to your last line, importation of mentalities is a two-way street - if the Eastern mindset is being imported in the West, the Western mindset is also being imported in the East - so, there's no way to escape the reality of globalism on matter the village or street or country that is a person's place of current residence. Despite what foolish people might think, electing Trump or voting in a Brexit like an "emergency button" on globalism will not halt globalism - just make it likely that those who're unable to cope with globalism at its own pace - will be left behind - while the world carries on business as usual and countries like Russia and China keep rising in power.
And also, as an American, while I do care about the welfare of other countries generally and their people, I am more concerned about the injustices that happen in the U.S. than I am in other parts of the world because I'd like to contribute my energies and resources to making immediately a difference here. Isn't there even a saying that "charity begins at home"? So, for example, while I do not especially espouse the isolationist sentiments that President Trump led people falsely believe he held dear during his campaign trails, I have and still do agree with the sentiments of concentrating our energies on making it better for people in America overall. So, for example, I am concerned about the growing divide in America that led today for Yahoo! to publish a news story in which pro-Trump and anti-Trump protesters clashed and some were arrested because I'm not liking the direction in which our country is headed; we used to as a nation be able to still respect each other despite the differences in our political stances, but it seems that now there is no more tolerance left on either side for people differing from one another on the political spectrum.
Also, in another news story I read specific to the thread topic, it said that these specific individuals who have been charged were being kept in an anti-terrorism cell? So, what does that mean? Additionally, it says previously five bloggers had been charged under the same law, and those bloggers, when they were subsequently returned to home unhurt, said that they were charged under the color of the law because they had criticized military and intelligence services of Pakistan. So, people are charged under blasphemy laws when they criticize the government?
Peace.
