Hidden side of paternity fraud

[ruby sparks]

Don't worry though Rhea, you aren't alone. Nobody else commented on that case either. Not one person. Despite that it's probably more everyday and typical of what the issue actually involves compared to some of the unlikely hypotheticals that have been discussed.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

But everyone else allegedly has reading comprehension issues???

Did you notice how I immediately owned up to and apologized for my error. Not something we have seen here from anybody else.

Or did you just assume that I had two different surrogate mothers for my children?

I don't believe you have a reading comprehension issue. I believe you have an honesty issue.

 

[Jokodo]

But everyone else allegedly has reading comprehension issues???

Did you notice how I immediately owned up to and apologized for my error. Not something we have seen here from anybody else.

You owned up to and apologised for misattributing my post to Rhea. In doing so, you referred to me as "she" immediately after I'd outed myself as a man, and I'm unclear you even understood that's what I was pointing out.

Someone's definitely having a reading comprehension issue.

Or did you just assume that I had two different surrogate mothers for my children?

I don't believe you have a reading comprehension issue. I believe you have an honesty issue.

That spiel again?

 

[ruby sparks]

Did the OP mention them?

The OP referenced Women Against Paternity Fraud. It would have been a cinch, even for someone with dial up speed issues, to just google 'Women Against Paternity Fraud'. There are numerous articles and opinions there. The thread could have been about those.

You may notice what my first post said.

I'm talking about the bulk, the overall emphasis, the general perspective en masse, of your posts (and latterly, your solution), not that you have offered your token agreement that it is a wrong. I could do that in a thread on a women's issue, and then proceed to minimise it for the women.

Look, RVonses's views are, to me, probably misogynistic, at least sexist and definitley not my views. Jolly? Well, Jolly makes some good points, but he's a bit fixated on making the most out of issues affecting men and has a bee in his bonnet about feminism. Jokodo is just here for a scrap. Laughing Dog supports Toni and puts the boot in Jolly no matter what. Loren Pechel is, imo, the biggest jerk ever to grace the internet. Beyond all this. Is the issue of paternity fraud itself.

 

[Jokodo]

Except you didn't do that at all. You chastised me and pretended I was putting things in your mouth when I took what you said at face value.

Wrong again. You may want to go read it again before compounding your errors. You can do better. We believe in you.

I just reread the exchange starting from where you called it "the equivalent". You remember incorrectly.

See, I didn't immediately jump to accusations of lying.

 

[Tom Sawyer]

/mod