HYPOTHETICALLY, if the Temple Mount area were somehow to be irradiated and contaminated in such a way that it could not be walked upon for the next 2,000 years, would it help or hurt the process of securing peace in the Middle East? Is the right to be able to own or to exclusively access this tiny strip of ground and its structures really important enough to a lot of people to sacrifice lives for? Or are various religious and political leaders merely pretending that it is?
I am remembering a contemporary news report that ultimately the Camp David peace talks broke down over both sides unwillingness to negotiate over this issue. Would anyone who can't go to the wailing wall be less jewish? Or less muslim if they couldn't actually visit and see allah's departure point?
It's funny how "faith" claims to depend so much upon tangible things like churches, icons, or other bricks and mortar, isn't it?
I am remembering a contemporary news report that ultimately the Camp David peace talks broke down over both sides unwillingness to negotiate over this issue. Would anyone who can't go to the wailing wall be less jewish? Or less muslim if they couldn't actually visit and see allah's departure point?
It's funny how "faith" claims to depend so much upon tangible things like churches, icons, or other bricks and mortar, isn't it?