• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

I have a solution to the black children who do not have fathers

 
 
 
R

RVonse

Veteran Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
3,855
Location
USA
Basic Beliefs
that people in the US are living in the matrx
At present, there are an unusually high ratio of black females to black males from the teens to age 30. The shortage of black males in that age group is mostly because they are either in jail or dead. There simply are not enough black males in the primary child bearing year age brackets to marry the females which is why so many young black kids are growing up without a father.

You can argue that it is because America is broken or because there is too much white privilege. It is more likely due to intelligence however: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MJUhDQKJcY But rather than get into an unnecessary debate about how this has happened....we are where we are today. And IMO there is an easy way out of this!

China just happens to have the opposite problem because in that country there are too many Chinese males right now due to the 1 child law that they had.

I have a solution to both problems! The excess black females in the USA should hook up and marry the excess Chinese males in China. Besides the obvious numbers advantage this will serve a positive genetic purpose too. The Chinese are known for the highest intelligence and the blacks are known for the highest physical strength. So offspring will be both intelligent and strong. Less single women, less single men, more strong family units, and kids growing up with fathers as well!

Whats not to like?
 
Don2 (Don1 Revised) said:
Well the op is completely serious and not attention-seeking.
Click to expand...

My irony meter just pegged.

The OP is essentially advocating eugenics, while suggesting that Black people are less intelligent. Generally, making sweeping generalizations about entire populations is plain wrong and very stupid. Bedbug stays on ignore. His sentiments should make your skin crawl.
 
phands said:
Don2 (Don1 Revised) said:
Well the op is completely serious and not attention-seeking.
Click to expand...

My irony meter just pegged.

The OP is essentially advocating eugenics, while suggesting that Black people are less intelligent. Generally, making sweeping generalizations about entire populations is plain wrong and very stupid. Bedbug stays on ignore. His sentiments should make your skin crawl.
Click to expand...

His sentiments do make my skin crawl.
But you totally made me laugh with the Wanze joke.
 
OP has obviously never been to China, nor has any inkling of its cultural mores about outsiders.
 
RVonse said:
At present, there are <trivial issue that I feel should be considered an existential threat because I am fearful>. The <supposed problem> is mostly because <racist assumption>. There simply <restatement of trivial issue> which is why <situation that isn't particularly problematic, but which engenders fear>.

You can argue that it is because <unevidenced assertion of fear> or because there is too much <racist assumption>. It is more likely due to <incredibly racist assumption, backed up by a YouTube video as though that were evidence> But rather than get into an unnecessary debate about how this has happened....we are where we are today. And IMO there is an easy <but incredibly stupid, authoritarian and racist> way out of this!

China just happens to have the opposite problem because in that country <further un-evidenced assertion that non-issue is big problem>.

I have a solution to both problems! <Force people to do things they don't want to do that support my racist agenda!>. Besides the obvious numbers advantage this will serve a <racist> purpose too. The Chinese are <un-evidenced racist claim> and the blacks are <un-evidenced racist claim>. So offspring will be <unsupported conclusion that shows a shocking lack of understanding of genetics>. Less <non-issue>, less <non-issue>, more <questionable benefit>, and <questionable benefit> as well!

Whats not to like?
Click to expand...
FTFY.

What's not to like is that your claims of a problem are wildly overstated; Your proposed 'solution' is authoritarian and impractical, you are trying to solve a problem that you have identified on behalf of other people who neither asked for your advice not wanted it, and this has all been demonstrated to be dangerous nonsense eighty years ago. Your fear is driving you to propose cruel and unnecessary changes be imposed on others (while you completely exempt yourself from having to change anything in your own life), in order to 'solve' a problem that only exists in your fearful mind to begin with. You have overstated the size of the issue, overestimated its actual importance, and proposed a cure that is far worse than the problem that you have yet to demonstrate even exists.

Apart from that. it's OK, I guess.
 
I now believe in creationism. Because, going by the OP, clearly we're not evolving as a species. If Jordan Peterson is considered an authority on anything, stupidity is growing at an exponential rate.

I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Click to expand...
 
RVonse said:
At present, there are an unusually high ratio of black females to black males from the teens to age 30. The shortage of black males in that age group is mostly because they are either in jail or dead. There simply are not enough black males in the primary child bearing year age brackets to marry the females which is why so many young black kids are growing up without a father.
Click to expand...

The number of black kids without fathers is more than the dead & incarcerated black males can account for.
 
To the inartfully put OP, a remedy for the fatherless black households is to promote marriage generally. A conservative criticism is that the big-government liberalism started in the 1960s devastated the black family. It encouraged promiscuity and out-of-wedlock births. No need to have a father around. I think the criticism has truth to it. Just look at this chart:

Percentage of U.S. Women Aged 40–44 Years Who Had Ever Married, by Year, Race, and Ethnicity
nihms777225f1.jpg


The Growing Racial and Ethnic Divide in U.S. Marriage Patterns

Boys need fathers. All children need stable families. Preferably a mother and a father. It may be politically incorrect to notice that these days but whatever.
 
Trausti said:
To the inartfully put OP, a remedy for the fatherless black households is to promote marriage generally. A conservative criticism is that the big-government liberalism started in the 1960s devastated the black family. It encouraged promiscuity and out-of-wedlock births. No need to have a father around. I think the criticism has truth to it. Just look at this chart:

Percentage of U.S. Women Aged 40–44 Years Who Had Ever Married, by Year, Race, and Ethnicity
nihms777225f1.jpg


The Growing Racial and Ethnic Divide in U.S. Marriage Patterns

Boys need fathers. All children need stable families. Preferably a mother and a father. It may be politically incorrect to notice that these days but whatever.
Click to expand...

I don't think the gender of the parents matters. Two can do a lot better job than one, though.

I don't think promoting marriage generally is going to help, though. Making a bad marriage isn't going to improve things.
 
Marriage is a poor proxy for either the number, or the quality, of parents in a family in the twenty first century.

Although I can understand why someone raised in the insanely religion dominated environment of the USA might not recognise that fact.

About half of the couples I know who have children and raise them together are not married; There doesn't appear to be much difference in the likelihood of separating between the married and unmarried ones.

Staying in a relationship solely because a divorce would be complicated and/or expensive is not a recipe for a happy family; If that's the only reason a child's parents are staying together, the child is probably better off if they do separate.
 
*grabs popcorn* this should be good





*and by good, I mean hilariously racist and mind-bogglingly stupid
 
bilby said:
Marriage is a poor proxy for either the number, or the quality, of parents in a family in the twenty first century.

Although I can understand why someone raised in the insanely religion dominated environment of the USA might not recognise that fact.

About half of the couples I know who have children and raise them together are not married; There doesn't appear to be much difference in the likelihood of separating between the married and unmarried ones.
Click to expand...

Also. as I pointed out in another thread, the gender mix of parents isn't significant.

What IS significant is the sheer awfulness of the idea of forcibly deporting kids to a country where they weren't born, and where they don't speak the language. Just ask Dreamers how they feel about that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom