Impeachment derail from Democrats 2020

[angelo]

A little of a long read, and it's from a despised [here at least] source. So I'm certain it will be completely ignored at your peril.

https://gellerreport.com/2020/01/wh...w-to-remove-president-trump-from-office.html/

‘WHISTLEBLOWER’ ERIC CIARAMELLA WAS OVERHEARD IN 2017 DISCUSSING WITH ALLY SEAN MISKO HOW TO REMOVE PRESIDENT TRUMP FROM OFFICE
BARELY TWO WEEKS AFTER DONALD TRUMP TOOK OFFICE, ERIC CIARAMELLA – THE CIA ANALYST WHOSE NAME WAS RECENTLY LINKED IN A TWEET BY THE PRESIDENT AND MENTIONED BY LAWMAKERS AS THE ANONYMOUS “WHISTLEBLOWER” WHO TOUCHED OFF TRUMP’S IMPEACHMENT – WAS OVERHEARD IN THE WHITE HOUSE DISCUSSING WITH ANOTHER STAFFER HOW TO REMOVE THE NEWLY ELECTED PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE, ACCORDING TO FORMER

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

A little of a long read, and it's from a despised [here at least] source. So I'm certain it will be completely ignored at your peril.

https://gellerreport.com/2020/01/whi...m-office.html/

‘WHISTLEBLOWER’ ERIC CIARAMELLA WAS OVERHEARD IN 2017 DISCUSSING WITH ALLY SEAN MISKO HOW TO REMOVE PRESIDENT TRUMP FROM OFFICE
BARELY TWO WEEKS AFTER DONALD TRUMP TOOK OFFICE, ERIC CIARAMELLA – THE CIA ANALYST WHOSE NAME WAS RECENTLY LINKED IN A TWEET BY THE PRESIDENT AND MENTIONED BY LAWMAKERS AS THE ANONYMOUS “WHISTLEBLOWER” WHO TOUCHED OFF TRUMP’S IMPEACHMENT – WAS OVERHEARD IN THE WHITE HOUSE DISCUSSING WITH ANOTHER STAFFER HOW TO REMOVE THE NEWLY ELECTED PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE, ACCORDING TO FORMER

The partisan diplomat (Sondland) who gave Trump $1 million for his Inauguration, says there was an understood Quid Quo Pro... after being bitten by the No Jail For Perjury Bug.

The guy that supports Trump a lot, says there was a Quid Quo Pro. You can fry up red herring all you want, but in the end, Trump did this, we know he did this, we know why he did this, we know how he did this. The only question to be asked is whether this offense rises to impeachable.

 

[ZiprHead]

A little of a long read, and it's from a despised [here at least] source. So I'm certain it will be completely ignored at your peril.

https://gellerreport.com/2020/01/wh...w-to-remove-president-trump-from-office.html/

‘WHISTLEBLOWER’ ERIC CIARAMELLA WAS OVERHEARD IN 2017 DISCUSSING WITH ALLY SEAN MISKO HOW TO REMOVE PRESIDENT TRUMP FROM OFFICE
BARELY TWO WEEKS AFTER DONALD TRUMP TOOK OFFICE, ERIC CIARAMELLA – THE CIA ANALYST WHOSE NAME WAS RECENTLY LINKED IN A TWEET BY THE PRESIDENT AND MENTIONED BY LAWMAKERS AS THE ANONYMOUS “WHISTLEBLOWER” WHO TOUCHED OFF TRUMP’S IMPEACHMENT – WAS OVERHEARD IN THE WHITE HOUSE DISCUSSING WITH ANOTHER STAFFER HOW TO REMOVE THE NEWLY ELECTED PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE, ACCORDING TO FORMER

With so many people out to get him, don't you think it was pretty stupid of Trump to ignore this and go ahead and commit crimes anyway?

 

[angelo]

A little of a long read, and it's from a despised [here at least] source. So I'm certain it will be completely ignored at your peril.

https://gellerreport.com/2020/01/whi...m-office.html/

‘WHISTLEBLOWER’ ERIC CIARAMELLA WAS OVERHEARD IN 2017 DISCUSSING WITH ALLY SEAN MISKO HOW TO REMOVE PRESIDENT TRUMP FROM OFFICE
BARELY TWO WEEKS AFTER DONALD TRUMP TOOK OFFICE, ERIC CIARAMELLA – THE CIA ANALYST WHOSE NAME WAS RECENTLY LINKED IN A TWEET BY THE PRESIDENT AND MENTIONED BY LAWMAKERS AS THE ANONYMOUS “WHISTLEBLOWER” WHO TOUCHED OFF TRUMP’S IMPEACHMENT – WAS OVERHEARD IN THE WHITE HOUSE DISCUSSING WITH ANOTHER STAFFER HOW TO REMOVE THE NEWLY ELECTED PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE, ACCORDING TO FORMER

The partisan diplomat (Sondland) who gave Trump $1 million for his Inauguration, says there was an understood Quid Quo Pro... after being bitten by the No Jail For Perjury Bug.

The guy that supports Trump a lot, says there was a Quid Quo Pro. You can fry up red herring all you want, but in the end, Trump did this, we know he did this, we know why he did this, we know how he did this. The only question to be asked is whether this offense rises to impeachable.

Any informed person would have to question the inpeachment charges, in put another way. Blind Freddy can see that they're nothing but trumped up [pardon the pun] charges that are destined to fail miserably. And that the only reason is desperation, knowing full well that this busload of Dem clowns wannabees are headed for defeat. Especially if Obuma speaks up about the likely front runner the rabid socialist Sanders................................................ https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...a-statement-as-bernie-sanders-rises-in-polls/

 

[angelo]

A little of a long read, and it's from a despised [here at least] source. So I'm certain it will be completely ignored at your peril.

https://gellerreport.com/2020/01/wh...w-to-remove-president-trump-from-office.html/

‘WHISTLEBLOWER’ ERIC CIARAMELLA WAS OVERHEARD IN 2017 DISCUSSING WITH ALLY SEAN MISKO HOW TO REMOVE PRESIDENT TRUMP FROM OFFICE
BARELY TWO WEEKS AFTER DONALD TRUMP TOOK OFFICE, ERIC CIARAMELLA – THE CIA ANALYST WHOSE NAME WAS RECENTLY LINKED IN A TWEET BY THE PRESIDENT AND MENTIONED BY LAWMAKERS AS THE ANONYMOUS “WHISTLEBLOWER” WHO TOUCHED OFF TRUMP’S IMPEACHMENT – WAS OVERHEARD IN THE WHITE HOUSE DISCUSSING WITH ANOTHER STAFFER HOW TO REMOVE THE NEWLY ELECTED PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE, ACCORDING TO FORMER

With so many people out to get him, don't you think it was pretty stupid of Trump to ignore this and go ahead and commit crimes anyway?

Crimes? They're crimes only to the left who have never accepted defeat in 2016.

 

[Patooka]

A little of a long read, and it's from a despised [here at least] source. So I'm certain it will be completely ignored at your peril.

https://gellerreport.com/2020/01/wh...w-to-remove-president-trump-from-office.html/

‘WHISTLEBLOWER’ ERIC CIARAMELLA WAS OVERHEARD IN 2017 DISCUSSING WITH ALLY SEAN MISKO HOW TO REMOVE PRESIDENT TRUMP FROM OFFICE
BARELY TWO WEEKS AFTER DONALD TRUMP TOOK OFFICE, ERIC CIARAMELLA – THE CIA ANALYST WHOSE NAME WAS RECENTLY LINKED IN A TWEET BY THE PRESIDENT AND MENTIONED BY LAWMAKERS AS THE ANONYMOUS “WHISTLEBLOWER” WHO TOUCHED OFF TRUMP’S IMPEACHMENT – WAS OVERHEARD IN THE WHITE HOUSE DISCUSSING WITH ANOTHER STAFFER HOW TO REMOVE THE NEWLY ELECTED PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE, ACCORDING TO FORMER

With so many people out to get him, don't you think it was pretty stupid of Trump to ignore this and go ahead and commit crimes anyway?

Crimes? They're crimes only to the left who have never accepted defeat in 2016.

Appealing to a foreign country to help your election chances is not only illegal in the US, it's illegal in Australia, New Zealand, France, Canada and pretty much every western democratic nation.

Also, winning an election doesn't give you complete immunity until the next election. That's like getting a job, and being able to do whatever the fuck you want without consequences until your next performance review. Real life doesn't work that way. It's even more ironic that you are spouting this crap as though it is a legitimate argument when you live in a country that hasn't had a single Prime Minister serve out a full term for over a decade.

 

[Gun Nut]

A little of a long read, and it's from a despised [here at least] source. So I'm certain it will be completely ignored at your peril.

https://gellerreport.com/2020/01/wh...w-to-remove-president-trump-from-office.html/

‘WHISTLEBLOWER’ ERIC CIARAMELLA WAS OVERHEARD IN 2017 DISCUSSING WITH ALLY SEAN MISKO HOW TO REMOVE PRESIDENT TRUMP FROM OFFICE
BARELY TWO WEEKS AFTER DONALD TRUMP TOOK OFFICE, ERIC CIARAMELLA – THE CIA ANALYST WHOSE NAME WAS RECENTLY LINKED IN A TWEET BY THE PRESIDENT AND MENTIONED BY LAWMAKERS AS THE ANONYMOUS “WHISTLEBLOWER” WHO TOUCHED OFF TRUMP’S IMPEACHMENT – WAS OVERHEARD IN THE WHITE HOUSE DISCUSSING WITH ANOTHER STAFFER HOW TO REMOVE THE NEWLY ELECTED PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE, ACCORDING TO FORMER

I heard a cop talking to another cop at a donut shop about the best way to handcuff a perp. Therefore, all cops ever want to do is handcuff people without any reason to do so and illegally detain them in handcuffs... because they talked about handcuffs.

 

[angelo]

Meanwhile the Bidens are completely ignored in the Ukrainian fiasco because Creepy Joe is likely to be the front runner for the Dems come November. The whole impeachment process which hasn't a leg to stand on anyway, is to distract the fact that no one in the busload of Dems clowns, especially Biden hasn't a hope in hell of defeating the Trump in November.

More dirt on the squeaky clean Bidens............................................. https://pagesix.com/2020/01/27/hunt...&tpcc=nypbreaking&mpweb=755-8563953-720425075

 

[ZiprHead]

Meanwhile the Bidens are completely ignored in the Ukrainian fiasco because Creepy Joe is likely to be the front runner for the Dems come November. The whole impeachment process which hasn't a leg to stand on anyway, is to distract the fact that no one in the busload of Dems clowns, especially Biden hasn't a hope in hell of defeating the Trump in November.

More dirt on the squeaky clean Bidens............................................. https://pagesix.com/2020/01/27/hunt...&tpcc=nypbreaking&mpweb=755-8563953-720425075

You call that dirt?

How about surreptitiously paying a porn star and a Playboy model $130,000 each trying to get them to keep their mouths shut about the sexual affairs Trump had with both of them?

Now THAT'S some good dirt.

 

[Keith&Co.]

You call that dirt?

I wanna know who called the Bidens 'squeaky clean?'

Everything I've seen just denies there's anything to this investigation Trump wants, but that's not saying they never did anything wrong. Senior Biden does look to me like someone who tips only 14% if the waitress doesn't call him 'sir.'

 

[ZiprHead]

You call that dirt?

I wanna know who called the Bidens 'squeaky clean?'

Everything I've seen just denies there's anything to this investigation Trump wants, but that's not saying they never did anything wrong. Senior Biden does look to me like someone who tips only 14% if the waitress doesn't call him 'sir.'

And forgets to put the toilet seat down.

 

[southernhybrid]

Meanwhile the Bidens are completely ignored in the Ukrainian fiasco because Creepy Joe is likely to be the front runner for the Dems come November. The whole impeachment process which hasn't a leg to stand on anyway, is to distract the fact that no one in the busload of Dems clowns, especially Biden hasn't a hope in hell of defeating the Trump in November.

More dirt on the squeaky clean Bidens............................................. https://pagesix.com/2020/01/27/hunt...&tpcc=nypbreaking&mpweb=755-8563953-720425075

Earth to Angelo. Hunter Biden isn't running for president, so what do his personal issues have to do with his father? Since when are politicians guilty for what their children may have done? Sheesh.

Trump's kids have taken far more advantage of their father's political position than Hunter ever did. But, the impeachment is about what Trump has done, not what his kids have done.

 

[angelo]

Meanwhile the Bidens are completely ignored in the Ukrainian fiasco because Creepy Joe is likely to be the front runner for the Dems come November. The whole impeachment process which hasn't a leg to stand on anyway, is to distract the fact that no one in the busload of Dems clowns, especially Biden hasn't a hope in hell of defeating the Trump in November.

More dirt on the squeaky clean Bidens............................................. https://pagesix.com/2020/01/27/hunt...&tpcc=nypbreaking&mpweb=755-8563953-720425075

You call that dirt?

How about surreptitiously paying a porn star and a Playboy model $130,000 each trying to get them to keep their mouths shut about the sexual affairs Trump had with both of them?

Now THAT'S some good dirt.

So you're now finally admitting it's wrong to have sex with beautiful women if running for high office? What about if one is already in the " Highest Office In The Land?" And she was just of average appearance.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Meanwhile the Bidens are completely ignored in the Ukrainian fiasco because Creepy Joe is likely to be the front runner for the Dems come November. The whole impeachment process which hasn't a leg to stand on anyway, is to distract the fact that no one in the busload of Dems clowns, especially Biden hasn't a hope in hell of defeating the Trump in November.

More dirt on the squeaky clean Bidens............................................. https://pagesix.com/2020/01/27/hunt...&tpcc=nypbreaking&mpweb=755-8563953-720425075

You call that dirt?

How about surreptitiously paying a porn star and a Playboy model $130,000 each trying to get them to keep their mouths shut about the sexual affairs Trump had with both of them?

Now THAT'S some good dirt.

So you're now finally admitting it's wrong to have sex with beautiful women if running for high office?

It wasn't during his run. It is illegal to pay off women for electoral purposes, without disclosing it.

 

[Elixir]

Meanwhile the Bidens are completely ignored in the Ukrainian fiasco because Creepy Joe is likely to be the front runner for the Dems come November. The whole impeachment process which hasn't a leg to stand on anyway, is to distract the fact that no one in the busload of Dems clowns, especially Biden hasn't a hope in hell of defeating the Trump in November.

More dirt on the squeaky clean Bidens............................................. https://pagesix.com/2020/01/27/hunt...&tpcc=nypbreaking&mpweb=755-8563953-720425075

"Your source for celebrity news, gossip, entertainment, pop culture, photos, video and more." - IOW a gossip source for the intellectually bankrupt who don't like Hillary or Biden.
Perfect for you angelo!

 

[angelo]

This attempted impeachment would've began the day after the Trump was sworn in as President had the deplorable Dems had the numbers in the House. Remember, it's on record that an extreme left newly elected woman? uttered we will impeach the MF!" only minutes after Dems won the House.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

This attempted impeachment would've began the day after the Trump was sworn in as President had the deplorable Dems had the numbers in the House. Remember, it's on record that an extreme left newly elected woman? uttered we will impeach the MF!" only minutes after Dems won the House.

Well, he should have been impeached after the Mueller Report was released due to the obstruction... and he should have been impeached after shaking down the Ukrainian President, violating campaign finance laws and the impoundment act and obstruction.

But this GOP is just so giddy over the Tariff Tax Hikes, the love letters with Kim Jong Un, and less free trade deals.

 

[Patooka]

This attempted impeachment would've began the day after the Trump was sworn in as President had the deplorable Dems had the numbers in the House. Remember, it's on record that an extreme left newly elected woman? uttered we will impeach the MF!" only minutes after Dems won the House.

Well, he should have been impeached after the Mueller Report was released due to the obstruction... and he should have been impeached after shaking down the Ukrainian President, violating campaign finance laws and the impoundment act and obstruction.

But this GOP is just so giddy over the Tariff Tax Hikes, the love letters with Kim Jong Un, and less free trade deals.

He should have been impeached after firing the head of a federal investigation. Last time I checked that was obstruction. He should have been impeached after throwing Israel under the bus and leaked classified information to Russia. He should have been impeached when it was clear Trump was violating the emoluments clause of the constitution. All of this occurred before 2018 and let's be honest; if a fraction of this crap was done by a democrat, we all know what angelo's reaction would be.

So Rashida Tlaib saying "we're going to impeach the motherfucker" isn't provocative, it's just pointing out the motherfucking obvious. All Trump had to do was colour between the lines, but unfortunately the cunt is as bent as a paperclip.

 

[angelo]

This attempted impeachment would've began the day after the Trump was sworn in as President had the deplorable Dems had the numbers in the House. Remember, it's on record that an extreme left newly elected woman? uttered we will impeach the MF!" only minutes after Dems won the House.

Well, he should have been impeached after the Mueller Report was released due to the obstruction... and he should have been impeached after shaking down the Ukrainian President, violating campaign finance laws and the impoundment act and obstruction.

But this GOP is just so giddy over the Tariff Tax Hikes, the love letters with Kim Jong Un, and less free trade deals.

He should have been impeached after firing the head of a federal investigation. Last time I checked that was obstruction. He should have been impeached after throwing Israel under the bus and leaked classified information to Russia. He should have been impeached when it was clear Trump was violating the emoluments clause of the constitution. All of this occurred before 2018 and let's be honest; if a fraction of this crap was done by a democrat, we all know what angelo's reaction would be.

So Rashida Tlaib saying "we're going to impeach the motherfucker" isn't provocative, it's just pointing out the motherfucking obvious. All Trump had to do was colour between the lines, but unfortunately the cunt is as bent as a paperclip.

Let's apply the same standards to the two term Obuma presidency shall we?



Under the New Trump Standard, Why Wasn't Obama Impeached?
.By Larry ElderJanuary 18, 2018
Under the New Trump Standard, Why Wasn't Obama Impeached?AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File
In the era of President Donald Trump, Democrats think presidents should be impeached over policy differences.

In Trump's case, the Democrats accuse him of winning the election by "colluding" with Russia to win. After nearly a year of investigations, there does not appear to be any evidence. Yet many Democrats have already called for impeachment.


In truth, Democrats want this President out because they don't like him or his policies. One of Trump's major campaign promises was to build a "wall" to protect our southern border. Never mind that, in 2006, 26 Democratic senators -- including Hillary Clinton, then-Sen. Barack Obama and Chuck Schumer -- voted for hundreds of miles of barriers and fencing. And every Senate Democrat voted for 2013's Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act, which again called for hundreds of miles of barriers

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...tandard_why_wasnt_obama_impeached_136029.html

 

[Patooka]

He should have been impeached after firing the head of a federal investigation. Last time I checked that was obstruction. He should have been impeached after throwing Israel under the bus and leaked classified information to Russia. He should have been impeached when it was clear Trump was violating the emoluments clause of the constitution. All of this occurred before 2018 and let's be honest; if a fraction of this crap was done by a democrat, we all know what angelo's reaction would be.

So Rashida Tlaib saying "we're going to impeach the motherfucker" isn't provocative, it's just pointing out the motherfucking obvious. All Trump had to do was colour between the lines, but unfortunately the cunt is as bent as a paperclip.

Let's apply the same standards to the two term Obuma presidency shall we?



Under the New Trump Standard, Why Wasn't Obama Impeached?
.By Larry ElderJanuary 18, 2018
Under the New Trump Standard, Why Wasn't Obama Impeached?AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File
In the era of President Donald Trump, Democrats think presidents should be impeached over policy differences.

In Trump's case, the Democrats accuse him of winning the election by "colluding" with Russia to win. After nearly a year of investigations, there does not appear to be any evidence. Yet many Democrats have already called for impeachment.


In truth, Democrats want this President out because they don't like him or his policies. One of Trump's major campaign promises was to build a "wall" to protect our southern border. Never mind that, in 2006, 26 Democratic senators -- including Hillary Clinton, then-Sen. Barack Obama and Chuck Schumer -- voted for hundreds of miles of barriers and fencing. And every Senate Democrat voted for 2013's Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act, which again called for hundreds of miles of barriers

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...tandard_why_wasnt_obama_impeached_136029.html

Policy disagreement isn't the new standard for impeachment. Your link, and your summary did not even address the point I made. But Larry Elder is notorious for obfuscation and deflection arguments.
When did Obama impede a federal investigation and fire the head of the FBI because of personal reasons? Show me your proof.
When did Obama throw Israel under a bus and leak classified documents to Russia or any other country? Show me your proof.
When did Obama break the emoluments clause of the constitution? Show me your proof.

You can't.

Bottom line. If Obama was held to the same standard as Trump, he would have been fine. Hell, Merrick Garland would be Chief Justice and there wouldn't be a sad senior Matt Damon clone who gets offended when asked if he likes beer on the bench. And if Obama did 5% of the shit Trump has done, Republicans would have sent Obama to the fucking chair.

Man I hope Democrats remember how Republican Joe Wilson acted during Obamas' first State of the Union speech and act accordingly next week. It's no less than what Trump deserves. It's time to give Trump the exact same treatment Republicans gave to Obama.