• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

“It happened everywhere”: The unimaginable scale of sexual abuse in Pennsylvania’s Catholic Church

phands

Veteran Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
1,976
Location
New York, Manhattan, Upper West Side
Basic Beliefs
Hardcore Atheist
The scale of religious child abuse is truly staggering....

“There have been other reports about child sexual abuse within the Catholic Church. But not on this scale. For many of us, those earlier stories happened someplace else, someplace away. Now we know the truth: it happened everywhere.” So begins the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s grand jury investigation into clergy abuse, released to the public on Tuesday afternoon. The 900-page report, which investigated all but one of the state’s dioceses, identifies over 1,000 victims of child sexual abuse and over 300 predatory priests.

https://newrepublic.com/minutes/150...le-sexual-abuse-pennsylvanias-catholic-church
 
Almost every alleged instance of abuse is "too old to be prosecuted".
Guess that means they all remain unproven allegations.

Same as in Australia. Folks waiting 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 years to report the rape of a child!
 
Page 4 of the report confirms that police and prosecutors aided the cover up. :eek:
 
The scale of religious child abuse is truly staggering....

“There have been other reports about child sexual abuse within the Catholic Church. But not on this scale. For many of us, those earlier stories happened someplace else, someplace away. Now we know the truth: it happened everywhere.” So begins the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s grand jury investigation into clergy abuse, released to the public on Tuesday afternoon. The 900-page report, which investigated all but one of the state’s dioceses, identifies over 1,000 victims of child sexual abuse and over 300 predatory priests.

https://newrepublic.com/minutes/150...le-sexual-abuse-pennsylvanias-catholic-church

Truly and utterly appalling if true, and given the verdicts that have been reached and similar abuses uncovered all around the world (not least here in Ireland) I would not by now be all that surprised. Shocked, every time, but not surprised.

The popularity and reputation of the RCC here has plummeted, especially among the young, the educated and the urban. I read that Ireland is now in the top 10 most atheist countries in the world. Much of the fall of the RCC (and other religions, the most prominent protestant version here in NI is arguably as bad in some respects and worse in others) has been self-inflicted. Not just the abuses, but arguably worse, the cover ups. By people who not long ago, even in my lifetime, virtually ran everyday life in the Republic of Ireland and were respected, trusted and revered, as individuals and as an institution.
 
Last edited:
Page 4 of the report confirms that police and prosecutors aided the cover up. :eek:

That happened here too. There was, for quite a while (no longer thankfully) a general reluctance to investigate, accuse or take to court, so heinous (and destabilising) was it deemed to be to uncover unpalatable truths about so popular and respected an institution. It wasn't only the church themselves who swept often commonly-known things under the carpet. Justice and the (often lifelong and secret) suffering of the victims was sacrificed by authorities in general in order to maintain the social status quo.

The sexual abuse was mostly of boys as I understand it. As for women, well, the mass graves of babies and the locking up of their unmarried mothers is another awful tale. Never mind the general violence towards schoolchildren. It would all be bad enough if perpetrated by anyone or any institution. That it was done by those claiming a supposed higher moral authority and in the name of christian loving-godliness just makes it all the worse. It has in my opinion become one of the most significant socio-religio-political unmaskings of modern times, in the world.

One has to add that the abuses, especially the worst ones, while arguably institutional, were done by a minority of priests, nuns and clergy, and sometimes (as in the non-sexual abuses) with at least partly good intentions, or if not that then with a certain ignorance and to a different standard compared to values espoused today. I mean, I went to a non-catholic, more or less secular (nominally Methodist) school and got hit and caned, but generally the stories my catholic friends tell of their schooldays is worse.
 
Last edited:
The scale of religious child abuse is truly staggering....

“There have been other reports about child sexual abuse within the Catholic Church. But not on this scale. For many of us, those earlier stories happened someplace else, someplace away. Now we know the truth: it happened everywhere.” So begins the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s grand jury investigation into clergy abuse, released to the public on Tuesday afternoon. The 900-page report, which investigated all but one of the state’s dioceses, identifies over 1,000 victims of child sexual abuse and over 300 predatory priests.

https://newrepublic.com/minutes/150...le-sexual-abuse-pennsylvanias-catholic-church

Truly and utterly appalling if true, and given the verdicts that have been reached and similar abuses uncovered all around the world (not least here in Ireland) I would not by now be all that surprised. Shocked, every time, but not surprised.

The popularity and reputation of the RCC here has plumeted, especially among the young, the educated and the urban. I read that Ireland is now in the top 10 most atheist countries in the world. Much of the fall of the RCC (and other religions, the most prominent protestant version here in NI is arguably as bad in some respects and worse in others) has been self-inflicted. Not just the abuses, but arguably worse, the cover ups. By people who not long ago, even in my lifetime, virtually ran everyday life in the Republic of Ireland and were respected, trusted and revered, as individuals and as an institution.

Agreed...not surprising, but shocking every time. I moved to Ireland (Greystones, Co Wicklow) in 2001, and stayed there until 2012. When I arrived, the RCC was still very much in charge - essentially controlling the government and immune to law-enforcement. That has changed enormously, the most recent victory being the referendum on abortion in May. Along the way, some seriously horrible stuff got exposed - child abuse of course: the Magdalene Laundries or the mass (almost 800) children's grave in a septic tank in Tuam. The RCC is in an evil organization, and needs to be ejected from the UN for crimes against humanity.
 
Agreed...not surprising, but shocking every time. I moved to Ireland (Greystones, Co Wicklow) in 2001, and stayed there until 2012. When I arrived, the RCC was still very much in charge - essentially controlling the government and immune to law-enforcement. That has changed enormously, the most recent victory being the referendum on abortion in May. Along the way, some seriously horrible stuff got exposed - child abuse of course: the Magdalene Laundries or the mass (almost 800) children's grave in a septic tank in Tuam.

Yes.

The RCC is in an evil organization, and needs to be ejected from the UN for crimes against humanity.

Personally, I wouldn't go that far, and I say that as an atheist (culturally protestant) from Ireland, born and brought up in the Republic, with no particular affection for the RCC.

I might get quite close to saying it though, in this particular case (perhaps not about christianity in general or about other religions). When can we say that an organisation is evil? Anyways I have reservations about the religious baggage of the word. Whether the RCC is at its core, evil, I don't know. I'm not privy to their motives. I do know that there are and were many good priests. There is though, and has been through history, a whiff that it's as much or more about (mostly male) power, politics, social control (and money) than almost anything else, especially at the upper levels. Jesus, if he existed and was anything like the sort of guy described, would surely be appalled if he were still alive, and perhaps many early christians would too. A wrong turn was taken at some point, imo, as I think was realised by the early protestants.
 
Agreed...not surprising, but shocking every time. I moved to Ireland (Greystones, Co Wicklow) in 2001, and stayed there until 2012. When I arrived, the RCC was still very much in charge - essentially controlling the government and immune to law-enforcement. That has changed enormously, the most recent victory being the referendum on abortion in May. Along the way, some seriously horrible stuff got exposed - child abuse of course: the Magdalene Laundries or the mass (almost 800) children's grave in a septic tank in Tuam.

Yes.

The RCC is in an evil organization, and needs to be ejected from the UN for crimes against humanity.

Personally, I wouldn't go that far, and I say that as an atheist (culturally protestant) from Ireland, born and brought up in the Republic, with no particular affection for the RCC.

I might get quite close to saying it though, in this particular case (perhaps not about christianity in general or about other religions). When can we say that an organisation is evil? Anyways I have reservations about the religious baggage of the word. Whether the RCC is at its core, evil, I don't know. I'm not privy to their motives. I do know that there are and were many good priests. There is though, and has been through history, a whiff that it's as much or more about (mostly male) power, politics, social control (and money) than almost anything else, especially at the upper levels. Jesus, if he existed and was anything like the sort of guy described, would surely be appalled if he were still alive, and perhaps many early christians would too. A wrong turn was taken at some point, imo, as I think was realised by the early protestants.

"If only the Führer knew what was being done in his name, he would surely be appalled and would put a stop to it." - Germans, 1933-45
 
The parishioners could not imagine that a priest could ever do this. That was half the problem. The other half of the problem was that priests were like gods. Bishops WERE gods for all intents and purposes. So it was easy to hide this abuse from naive, obedient congregations many of whom had immigrant roots in patriarchal cultures.

I spent 8 years in a Catholic school and they were good years. Some of the priests were assholes but nothing more.

It's good that this has come out. People will not forget or dismiss alleged priestly behavior so easily.

The scary thing is that of all those priests only 300 were named. I am absolutely certain that the vast, vast majority of priests, nuns and seminarians of the RCC knew this was happening. That's the sad part. They are guilty as a group for having allowed this.

And things do not change overnight. No doubt this is still happening.
 
Here Are the Worst Abuses by Catholic Priests from the PA Grand Jury’s Report

This is truly unspeakable. The RCC should truly be an illegal organization....

Here’s a running list of some of the more egregious things you’ll find in the report. It’s not everything. It’s not even everything for these priests. It’s just the stuff that will make your eyes permanently widen. The hope is that by highlighting these stories, people will realize the horrors covered up by the Catholic Church.
Maybe they’ll think twice before ever attending another Mass or donating any of their money to a Catholic school.

  • Father Francis “Frank” Fromholzer asked one girl, when she was 13 or 14, to read a story about Jesus that included the phrase, “the cock crows three times.” He made her repeat that phrase several times. When she left class, he “leaned in and nuzzled her neck and asked the victim if she knew what a cock was.”
  • Father Edward R. Graff was about to anally rape a child, but the victim ran away before it could happen, even though it meant running “into the street, mostly nude.”
  • Father Chester Gawronski fondled and masturbated at least 12 different children by saying he was just showing them “how to check for cancer.” (When one of these stories went public in 2002, Bishop Donald Trautman chastised the victim by arguing that he was only 14 when it happened, not 11 like the article said.)
  • Father William Presley abused three victims, one as young as 13, with “choking, slapping, punching, rape, sodomy, fellatio, anal intercourse,” and more.
  • Father Thomas D. Skotek raped an underage girl, got her pregnant, then paid for her abortion. His Bishop later said, “This is a very difficult time in your life, and I realize how upset you are. I too share your grief.” That letter was addressed to Skotek, not his victim.
  • Father Edmond Parrakow admitted to molesting “approximately thirty-five male children” because sex with girls was “sinful” and raping boys didn’t violate them. One altar boy said Parrakow told them to go naked under their cassocks during Mass because God didn’t want “man-made clothes” touching their skin during services. Parrakow now works in a shopping mall.
  • Father Raymond Lukac “married” a victim the moment she turned 18 by forging the head pastor’s signature on a fake marriage certificate. He eventually married her for real, had a child with her (impregnating her when she was 17), then got a divorce. He stayed in the ministry after being taken in by a “benevolent bishop.”
  • Father Robert Moslener taught middle school kids how to give blowjobs by telling them Mary had to “bite off the cord” and “lick” Jesus clean when he was born.
  • Father Augustine Giella abused five girls in the same family. Among other things, he collected their urine, public hair, and menstrual blood in a device attached to his toilet… then he ingested some of it. All of this happened after he worked at a Catholic high school and had been accused of telling a student he wanted to watch her go to the bathroom.
  • Father Arthur Long tried having sex with a 17-year-old at a high school he worked at by saying God wanted them to express love for each other that way. When she said God would punish them, he told her, “there is no Hell.”
  • Father George Zirwas was part of a predatory priest “ring” that “shared intelligence” on victims and exchanged them with each other. They “manufactured child pornography” on church property, using “whips, violence and sadism in raping their victims.”
  • Father Richard Zula asked three altar boys to “pose like statues” and tried to tie them up with rope. Zula also used whips and leather straps on a victim after tying up the person’s hands.
  • Father Robert N. Caparelli raped several boys as young as 10. He was eventually put in prison, where it was discovered he “had been HIV-positive for years.”
  • Monsignor Thomas J. Benestad forced a nine-year-old boy to give him a blowjob, then washed his mouth out with holy water “to purify him.”
  • Reverend David Connell served a high school boy juice. The boy later woke up with no memory of what happened, but there was “bleeding from his rectum.”
  • Reverence Edward George Ganster once dragged a child across a room by his underwear and beat him with a metal cross. He eventually quit the priesthood… but not before receiving a letter of recommendation for his new job… at Walt Disney World.
  • Father Richard J. Guiliani began abusing one girl when she was 14, forcing her to masturbate him and blow him. When she turned 18, he visited her and asked for sex and her hand in marriage. (She declined both.)
  • Reverend Henry Paul is the reason one little girl told her mother she knew how to “French kiss.”
  • Reverend Gerald Royer once molested a 12-year-old boy. The boy’s friend didn’t believe it… until, hidden in a closet, he witnessed the abuse himself. The victim, now 83, fought in wars, yet because of what Royer did, he could never hug or kiss his own children, who were boys. He can’t shake hands with men to this day. He can’t even see male doctors or dentists.
  • Reverend Michael G. Barletta was known to take pictures in a boys’ locker room and maintained a book of “crotch shots.”
  • Father Robert E. Hannon had several male victims, but his diocese dismissed allegations from one girl after Hannon denied it. His argument? He wouldn’t have done it because girls “do not have a penis.”
  • Father Gerard Krebs, a teacher at a Catholic high school, was asked for advice by a student whose girlfriend was pregnant. Krebs conducted a prostate exam to see if the boy was “capable of impregnating a woman.” Another victim said Krebs guided him through “sexual rituals” to “prove my faith and the fact that I was not a homosexual.”
  • Monsignor Daniel Martin and other priests in the seminary had a “fierce competition,” one victim said, to molest boys who didn’t have fathers or had bad relationships with them.
  • Brother Edmundus Murphy encouraged a victim to join their Catholic school’s wrestling team and taught him different moves, naked, because that’s what “the ancient Greeks and Romans did.” During those practices, Murphy sodomized the victim.
  • Father Gregory Flohr took a victim into the confessional and tied him up with rope. When the victim screamed, Flohr shut him up by shoving his penis in the victim’s mouth. When the victim would accept it, Flohr sodomized him with a crucifix and called him a “bad boy.”
  • Father Charles B. Guth fondled a boy and stuck his finger up the child’s ass. Then he said to the boy that if their secret ever got out, the child and his mother would both burn in hell. Then he gave the boy a nickel.
  • Father Francis Lesniak told a victim that if he confessed his sins and wasn’t too bad, he’d “get to suck on a strawberry lollipop or popsicle.” After these confessions, which happened multiple times, Lesniak would whip his dick out and say it was a strawberry lollipop.
  • Father Henry J. Marcinek is the reason one victim said as an adult, “I don’t remember the last time I laughed.” That same victim later confessed that “I peed in [Marcinek’s] mouth, because he used to cum in mine” and that he felt like he was “fricking prostituting himself” at the age of 12 or 13.
  • Father Roger J. Trott anally raped a 21-year-old man with Down Syndrome, after which the victim was reportedly hospitalized for “surgery for a blockage of the lower bowel.”
  • Reverend Francis A. Bach had so many victims, then when his diocese confronted him about a particular allegation, he said he didn’t remember it, but responded, “With my history, anything is possible.”
  • Reverend James Beeman raped a seven-year-old in the hospital just after she had “had her tonsils removed.” He raped her again when she was 19 and pregnant.
  • Reverend George Koychick inappropriately touched several little girls. When confronted about it by his diocese, he admitted it, adding, “it was when I was going through a touchy/feely time in my life.”
  • Reverend Guy Marsico admitted to molesting several boys and confessing his sins to another priest. The advice was never to call police or turn himself in. Instead, he was told to “Pray about it and try to get away from it.” Then, when it happened again, he’d receive the same advice.
  • Reverend Patrick Shannon molested a 16-year-old boy during a camping trip. When the boy resisted, Shannon replied, “Sometime [sic] we say no when we really mean yes.”
  • Reverend Timothy Sperber sexually abused a girl no older than 10. When she told the principal of their Catholic school that Sperber “touched her in weird ways,” the principal called her a “demon-child” for making those “terrible accusations.”
  • Reverend Frederick Vaughn abused an 11-year-old girl, wrestling with her on the floor at her family’s home when her father wasn’t around. One time, when she resisted, he said, “I like a fighter.”
  • Reverend Leo Burchianti once entered a bathroom with an underage boy and put his hands down the boy’s shorts. When the boy told Burchianti to stop tickling him, the response was, “I’m not trying to tickle you, I’m trying to grab for something.”
  • Reverend Anthony J. Cipolla took a 9-year-old boy to his rectory bedroom, told the child to take off his clothes, then squeezed his penis a total of 70 times before sticking a finger into his rectum. Later, even though his mother wanted to file criminal charges, she dropped them because “she was threatened and harassed by church officials” and told that she should “let the church handle it.”
  • Reverend David F. Dzermejko fondled a young boy on a Ferris wheel during a church festival. The boy couldn’t get off the ride because Dzermejko told the operator “to keep the ride going three times longer than it should have.”
  • Reverend Bernard J. Kaczmarczyk went into the shower with a 12-year-old boy under the pretext that he needed to make sure the child was “showering properly.”
  • Reverend Anujit Kumar kissed an underage girl with his tongue and sucked her lips. When Church officials asked him about it, he was he was just trying to “recruit her for the convent.”
  • [Redacted] molested a child for years. When the victim turned 15 or 16, he asked the priest to stop and threatened to go public with what had happened. The priest “grabbed him by the throat and threatened to kill him if he told anyone.” He also threatened to tell the victim’s parents he was gay.
  • Monsignor Raymond T. Schultz masturbated in front of a student at their Catholic school. Afterwards, Schultz would give the kid a handkerchief to wipe the semen off his face. To this day, the victim said, he goes from “sad to angry” whenever he sees a white handkerchief.
  • Father Robert E. Spangenberg molested an underage boy several times. He also paid the victim a “finder’s fee” if he could find other young “chickens” for Spangenberg to have sex with.
  • Reverend Paul G. Spisak supposedly took pictures with underage boys in which their swim trunks were down to their ankles. His staff says they saw the pictures… until they disappeared. Spisak may have destroyed the images. A couple of years ago, however, he was arrested for a camera he placed in a mall bathroom. At first he denied it. Then he said he was sick, ran inside a stall, and flushed the memory card down the toilet.
  • Reverend Anthony P. Conmy molested a 10-year-old girl after dropping her friend off at home. He grabbed her wrists, put his hand over her mouth, put his knee in her stomach to hold her down, then said he wouldn’t kill her if she “would lie quietly.”
  • Reverend P. Lawrence Homer told a 14-year-old girl she had the body of an 18-year-old woman. He also commented on her “sex hair.”
That’s just a sampling.
The grand jury also noted how the Church managed to cover all these crimes up as long as they did. Leaders, they said, followed a “playbook for concealing the truth” that consisted of seven steps:

  1. Use euphemisms. (“Never say “rape”; say “inappropriate contact” or “boundary issues.”)
  2. Don’t investigate with trained personnel. (Instead, let clergy members ask the victims “inadequate” questions before judging their own colleagues.)
  3. Evaluate priests at church-run “treatment centers.”
  4. Never say why a priest was removed. (Just say he’s on “sick leave” or something.)
  5. Keep providing priests with living expenses regardless of the allegations.
  6. Transfer the priests if his crime becomes public knowledge. (Send him to a place where “no one will know he is a child abuser.”)
  7. Don’t tell the police. (Keep it “in house.”)
Finally, is there any way to fix this?
Yes, said the grand jury, and they offered a few recommendations:

  • Eliminate the criminal statue of limitations. Pennsylvania law now permits victims to come forward until age 50, but the grand jury said they heard from victims who were, in some cases, in their 70s, but had no legal recourse anymore. They’ve spent their entire lives traumatized by what they went through and an arbitrary cutoff to seek justice is cruel.
  • Let victims sue the diocese in a timely manner. In many cases, victims “ran out of time to sue before they even knew they had a case.” They need a “window” of time in which to sue once they’re aware of the situation. It shouldn’t be closed off before they even know their options.
  • Laws must mandate the reporting of abuse, even in Church. There are too many loopholes in the state law that allowed churches to get away with not letting law enforcement know about what predatory priests were doing.
  • Confidentiality arguments must be tossed aside in criminal cases. The Church had them for decades. In some cases, they gave victims some money to silence them for life.
That second one is receiving criticism from some Catholics. They argue that suing the diocese — and getting money in a victory — would only hurt the parishioners who donated, not the priests who committed the acts or the others who covered it up. Though the flip side of that says… who cares? If the congregation is giving money to an organization complicit in these crimes, a lawsuit would teach them to stop donating to the church.

Read more at http://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/...he-pa-grand-jurys-report/#ozkcddyrF0JSGMWq.99
 
...
The scary thing is that of all those priests only 300 were named. I am absolutely certain that the vast, vast majority of priests, nuns and seminarians of the RCC knew this was happening. That's the sad part. They are guilty as a group for having allowed this.

And things do not change overnight. No doubt this is still happening.

That's the problem with faith in God. It becomes reasonable and virtuous to believe God will fix it, and so it would be self righteous and even sinful to get involved.
 
...
The scary thing is that of all those priests only 300 were named. I am absolutely certain that the vast, vast majority of priests, nuns and seminarians of the RCC knew this was happening. That's the sad part. They are guilty as a group for having allowed this.

And things do not change overnight. No doubt this is still happening.

That's the problem with faith in God. It becomes reasonable and virtuous to believe God will fix it, and so it would be self righteous and even sinful to get involved.

The RCC is big on mea culpa, but that's where it ends unfortunately, probably because the RCC is a classic example of empowering the leader at the cost of disempowering the member. Catholics traditionally hold their leaders in the highest regard, kinda like a cult of obedience. Unfortunate for the kids.
 
The report says laws must mandate the reporting of abuse - presumably reporting it to the police.
What a great idea.
I never understood why so many victims and their parents and the hearsay gossip brigade, who all allegedly knew what was going on, somehow never found the time to make a statement to the police.
 
The report says laws must mandate the reporting of abuse - presumably reporting it to the police.
What a great idea.
I never understood why so many victims and their parents and the hearsay gossip brigade, who all allegedly knew what was going on, somehow never found the time to make a statement to the police.

Did you grow up in this environment? If you had, you would understand how this could happen.

Now if you are denying it happened or are blaming the victims and their families out of some sense of loyalty or other motivation, then you have demonstrated my point quite nicely.
 
I never understood why so many victims and their parents and the hearsay gossip brigade, who all allegedly knew what was going on, somehow never found the time to make a statement to the police.

Have you ever spent any time talking to someone who was abused? I'm going to guess the answer is no.

This is something I have not personally experienced (thankfully) but the mother of my child? That's another story. Her abuser was not a Catholic priest, but the pattern repeats. Here's how it went for her:

After he raped her in the bathroom, he knocked her unconscious and waited until she came to. She woke up with a gun pressed against her temple and him saying "if you ever say anything about this I'll take you and your kid out into the desert, shoot both of you, and leave your bodies for the coyotes to eat." He went on to tell her that reporting it to the police was a waste of time because he had friends on the force and if she did they'd side with him over her.

He wasn't kidding. Spoiler alert, there are crooked cops who will defend their friends and family members in domestic violence situations. There was this one time when my late father in law had had enough and took a swing at the abuser, who proceeded to beat the shit out of him. The cops didn't do a damned thing, even though the confrontation happened in public outside of a bar.

And the thing is, this was just your garden variety domestic abuse/enabling. There was - again - no thousand year old institution behind the enabling.

But the violent asshole? Born again Christian. A man who could quote chapter and verse from the Bible. His family were so steeped in religion it made me physically ill. It took the better part of a decade for my ex to emotionally and psychologically extract herself from that nightmare and my kid still hasn't entirely sorted out the impact all these years later.
 
I've met one or two people who for them it is "God first, Family second." Sad. I would never want to be a child in such a family. I was not, thankfully.
 
Bill Donohue: The PA Priests Molested Teens, Not Toddlers, So It’s Not That Bad

Just....wow....the piece of filth at the top of the catholic league said....

But the Catholic League’s Bill Donohue has never been someone who has good ideas, so he rushed out an 11-page report “debunking” what we’ve come to learn about the horrors in six Pennsylvania dioceses.

You can read it for yourself. I’m not going to respond to every absurd defense of the Church. Let me just point out a couple of ways Donohue tries to parse the grand jury report to seem less disturbing than it really is.


Myth: The priests “raped” their victims.





Fact: This is an obscene lie. Most of the alleged victims were not raped: they were groped or otherwise abused, but not penetrated, which is what the word “rape” means.


Oh. The priests just groped underage boys and girls. Why is everyone so angry about that?! (As one online commenter suggested, “No penetration” is the new “No collusion.”


Besides dismissing what would still be a very real problem, it’s not even true! Many of the priests penetrated their victims. That’s a fact. They used their penises. They used their fingers. They even used physical objects.




Myth: The abusive priests were pedophiles.



FACT: … Anyone who actually reads the report knows it is a lie. Most were postpubescent. This doesn’t make the molestation okay — the guilty should be imprisoned — but it is wrong to give the impression that we are talking about 5-year-olds when more typically they were 15-year-olds.


This is a new low bar for Catholic Church defenders. The priests were raping tweens, not toddlers, so back off!

Read more at http://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/...lers-so-its-not-that-bad/#PzWEdFTvgWtctAc3.99
 
What Father Bradel Did to Me

This is the first I've seen of what I'm sure will be a flood of such stories....

When I saw the name of the priest who molested me listed in the Pennsylvania grand jury’s report, I thought: I’m gonna be in big trouble. The abuse started when I was about 12 years old, so it’s not a surprise that the language that came to mind was straight out of that period of my life.


I scanned through the nearly 900 pages of the report that was released by the attorney general last week. It detailed abuse in six dioceses over 70 years, listing more than 300 abusive priests. The accounts were horrifying — young victims were given gold cross necklaces to signal to other predators that they were ‘optimal targets’ — and the documentation of what happened is surely a good thing.


But what stunned me was my second reaction: a perplexing disappointment that I still don’t know whether I was his only victim. Of course, I didn't want others to have experienced what I did. But I did want some confirmation that his behavior was part of a pattern.


In the 1960s, Catholic priests were a special class of bachelors, fed pot roast dinners by a bucket brigade of parish women, so when Father Bradel came to our house in central Pennsylvania for the first of many regular visits, my mother got out the good china.


Then our family sat stifled into silence as he held forth on evils of the changing times, reserving special fury for the New Mass, where the organ was replaced by a guitar and tambourine, and where laypeople carried felt banners decorated with handprints and doves. Taking her cue, my mother once asked him what he thought of my Catholic high school teacher who’d assigned the book “A Clockwork Orange” to his class despite a church ban on the movie.


We weren’t just Mass-on-Sunday Catholics. My mother had laundered the parish vestments when the parish was newly founded, and my father put 10 percent of his take-home pay in the collection basket every week for his entire life. My sisters and I went to parochial school; I wrote flowery poems about the Virgin Mary for the church bulletin. And in the dining room, behind where Father Bradel sat, hung a gold-framed reproduction of Leonardo da Vinci’s “The Last Supper.”


You have 2 free articles remaining.


Subscribe to The Times
When my mother asked about the Catholic teacher’s defiant assignment, the priest slammed his palm on table. The plates jumped. The water in the water glasses sloshed. The lamp over the table vibrated ever so slightly. “I want to know what Patty thinks,” he said. He turned his mastiff-like head in my direction. My three younger sisters looked at me in awe, as if they were expecting me to turn the water into wine. My father looked on in pity. My mother adopted a pose of polite curiosity.


I found myself answering, slowly at first, then, under the blaze of his questions, articulating an opinion in favor of the assignment. Until now, ours was a home where only the adults had opinions. I waited to be sent away from the table for this heresy — or for my mother to mete out the real punishment later, to the backs of my legs with a wooden spoon. But when I finished, Father Bradel made the sign of the cross over my head. My father exhaled. My mother adopted a tight smile. Amen.


The dinners became a tradition. One night, Father Bradel arrived early. My mother, who grew up in an era when girls tap-danced or recited poetry for guests, said to me, “Go in the living room and entertain Father Bradel.” She ushered the two of us into the living room, that museum of suburban propriety, and left. Father Bradel and I stood there awkwardly, as if we were waiting to be introduced. He was wearing a long black cassock and stiff white clerical collar; I was in my school uniform and knee socks.


With no warning, he pulled me to him, crushing me in the blackness of his robe, my cheek so close to his heart that I could hear it pounding. He pulled back, appraising me. I looked away, terrified by this display, focusing intently on a nearby studio portrait of me and my sisters. He bent his knees, so we were at eye level, and tipped my chin toward him. Then he kissed me, his lips wet and flaccid, his mouth open wide enough that his teeth dug into my lower lip. His tongue probed for mine. I stood frozen, my arms at my sides.


It was my first kiss.

Read the rest at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/18/opinion/sunday/victim-church-abuse-pennsylvania.html
 
Pope Francis Urges Catholics to Pray and Fast in Response to Child Sex Abuse

Unbelievable...

The Catholic Church is still reeling from the release of a report documenting acts of child sexual abuse by hundreds of priests in six Pennsylvania dioceses.
This morning, in a letter directed to Catholics around the world, Pope Francis said the Church must “condemn these atrocities.” He acknowledged how the Church “showed no care for the little ones; we abandoned them.”
That’s all well and good — he expressed deep remorse for the victims — but the real questions are what the Vatican plans to do to prevent future crimes and how they’ll punish those responsible for committing and covering up the abuse.
Instead of actually offering any solutions, though, the pope called for fasting and prayer.

shutterstock_188022557.jpg
penance and prayer will help us to open our eyes and our hearts to other people’s sufferings and to overcome the thirst for power and possessions that are so often the root of those evils. May fasting and prayer open our ears to the hushed pain felt by children, young people and the disabled. A fasting that can make us hunger and thirst for justice and impel us to walk in the truth, supporting all the judicial measures that may be necessary. A fasting that shakes us up and leads us to be committed in truth and charity with all men and women of good will, and with society in general, to combatting all forms of the abuse of power, sexual abuse and the abuse of conscience.

Sure, children were raped, but if Catholics don’t eat as much, we’ll call it a draw.



Read more at http://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/...ponse-to-child-sex-abuse/#Kw4LV5XzsMR6DW33.99
 
Back
Top Bottom