• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Meanwhile, In Canada...

Jolly_Penguin

Banned
Banned
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Messages
10,366
Location
South Pole
Basic Beliefs
Skeptic
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/man-shoots-grizzly-video-bella-coola-bc-1.4875956

A man came home to have a grizzly bear charge at him with mouth open, and he shot at the bear's leg to repel it. This has become controversial in the area. Should the man have done otherwise?

Meanwhile: https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/trudeau-carbon-climate-1.4874488

Canadian Prime Minister harbouring in carbon tax on gas and squabbles with Ontario Premier over it.

..

Just thought y'all might like to see what life is like where things are saner and Trump isn't president.
 
SYG defences have no place in civilized societies. Do we know anything about the home life of this bear and what led it to consider violence to have been an appropriate action? Did he even try to counter this angry bear's charge with a hug and a willingness to listen to its problems? Just pulling out a gun and shooting is not OK.
 
I personally blame Trump for creating the climate in which Bear-Human relations escalate to violence so quickly.
 
What would Bob & Doug do?

They experienced this once. They offered the bear a beer. The bear enjoyed it and got drunk and they had a jolly good time in the forest eh? Take off hoser!

What strikes me about this story in OP is that the man shot the bear in the leg in the hope not to kill the bear. That would not be what an American would do in his place.

Reminds me of when that van driving killer mowed down pedestrians in Toronto and kept "drawing" a fake gun to try to get a police officer to shoot him, and the officer wouldn't. That would never happen in the US either.
 
What would Bob & Doug do?

They experienced this once. They offered the bear a beer. The bear enjoyed it and got drunk and they had a jolly good time in the forest eh? Take off hoser!

What strikes me about this story in OP is that the man shot the bear in the leg in the hope not to kill the bear. That would not be what an American would do in his place.

Reminds me of when that van driving killer mowed down pedestrians in Toronto and kept "drawing" a fake gun to try to get a police officer to shoot him, and the officer wouldn't. That would never happen in the US either.

He was loaded with birdshot. I'm no hunter, but am guessing he couldn't have killed that bear no matter how much American bloodlust. Tripping the bear bought him time to get away.
 
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/man-shoots-grizzly-video-bella-coola-bc-1.4875956

A man came home to have a grizzly bear charge at him with mouth open, and he shot at the bear's leg to repel it. This has become controversial in the area. Should the man have done otherwise?
I don't think so.
mCfCV3t.gif
 
CBC said:
A homeowner in central B.C. has been captured on video shooting a charging grizzly bear in his yard — a decision he says he made in trying to protect himself and his family, but one that has drawn threats in the days since.

Empty threats by pieces of shit that are so full of pieces of it that they can't fathom shooting at a charging grizzly bear? Why, because in their twisted heads, it's better to die from a charging grizzly that was provoked instead of being scared off?

He came home and learned of this repeated deadly nuisance. With compassion, he opted to scare it off. That it transgressed into provocation is even itself signs of warped thinking--no matter how "provoked" is used. First off, his intention wasn't to incite an attack. His intention was to scare it off. That's enough right there to take a step back and consider the judgemental word play as somehow being justification for death threats. When an intention to do one thing leads to something else, it's doesn't turn into provocation.

Earlier this month, he went outside to scare off the sow with a shotgun loaded with birdshot.
What a dipshit. Don't get me wrong, I have no qualms with him going outside to scare off the bear with a loaded shotgun. It's what it's loaded with that concerns me. Birdshot, seriously? Being charged is always a possibility. Be armed with the tools to stop the threat regardless of intent.

The animal may be wild and unable to realize she's trespassing. It can't read, and listening isn't a developed skill. But, don't think for a moment that they don't know what they're doing. Don't let the reasons take you too far. They know damn well the damage they'll reek when they get ahold of you.

By leaving them on the property, you're playing Russian roulette, and I'm not doing that with my kids or my family."
exactly

Michalchuk's wife filmed the encounter with the bear and posted it on YouTube.
See, this is where they're not all that different than the bears. Clueless in some respects but fully aware in others.

Pieces of shit are out there--and it didn't even dawn on them. Had they even thought of it, it probably ended with "I don't care what other people think."

"I didn't want to shoot her in the face so I clipped her in the right leg. Thank God when I shot, it did exactly what I hoped it would do: It tripped her."

No comment
 
WTF? What kind of dumbass walks out to confront a grizzly bear that has cubs? Doesn't every Canadian know that a bear, especially a grizzly, with cubs is not to be trifled with? I wonder if he was even dumber and got between the bear and one of her cubs.

Well, maybe he was really drunk at the time.
 
He wanted to scare it off because his kids walk around in that area. This isn't deep in the woods. This is at his home.
 
WTF? What kind of dumbass walks out to confront a grizzly bear that has cubs? Doesn't every Canadian know that a bear, especially a grizzly, with cubs is not to be trifled with? I wonder if he was even dumber and got between the bear and one of her cubs.

Well, maybe he was really drunk at the time.

It appears he was closer to the cubs than the mother when approaching. That doesn't seem very smart either.
 
He wanted to scare it off because his kids walk around in that area. This isn't deep in the woods. This is at his home.

Yeah, I got that but only a dumbass confronts a grizzly even if it doesn't have cubs. Call the CBSAACA (Canadian Big Scary-Ass Animal Control Agency) who know what they are doing when it comes to grizzlies or, if they won't handle it, take care of the problem with something more appropriate than a 12 gauge shotgun loaded with birdshot. However, the shotgun with birdshot may be appropriate if his home is ever threatened by a real scary covey of quail or an exceptionally frightening squirrel.

For some reason I had expected that Canadians would have a bit better understanding of how dangerous bears can be than us south of the 49th. It looks like Disney's movies where all animals are cute and cuddly has killed all our survival instincts.
 
Last edited:
WTF? What kind of dumbass walks out to confront a grizzly bear that has cubs? Doesn't every Canadian know that a bear, especially a grizzly, with cubs is not to be trifled with? I wonder if he was even dumber and got between the bear and one of her cubs.

Well, maybe he was really drunk at the time.

It appears he was closer to the cubs than the mother when approaching. That doesn't seem very smart either.
:) Too many qualifiers there. Approaching a bear isn't smart. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom