No, I am not. I have never said that we should judge all Muslims by acts of individuals. At the same time, we must admit that there is a unique threat of extremism coming from Islam.
We also should be selective as to who is allowed to immigrate into Western countries. Right now Europe is taking in everybody who shows up anywhere in the general vicinity of Europe, no questions asked. That is obviously a stupid strategy.
And besides, this shit is happening over and over again. It's a pattern, not an anecdote.
Are you still beating your wife?
Because evangelicals in Africa have been killing children for "witchcraft." The death toll is estimated at around a thousand, and most of those children were killed with fire or acid. Do you agree that murdering a thousand concern with fire or acid is immoral, or have the Christians corrupted your morals? Do you agree that all Christians should be condemned for this?
No, but I do think that these witch-hunting Evangelcals should not be allowed to immigrate into Europe or the West. Which means that, again, migrants should be vetted.
The danger of mass migration of those with incompatible cultures is not limited to Islam, but it is currently most acute with Islamists.
Or does this kind of
hasty generalization fallacy supply to Muslims, but not Christians? Because if that is the case, then you are committing a
special pleading fallacy.
As I have explained, it is neither.