Naked Baby Sues Nirvana et al over Nevermind Album cover

[Jimmy Higgins]

link

You might think this is misplaced and belongs in the Freethought Humor section, but truth be told, this concept I wouldn't have considered funny enough to go forward with. But the person that was the baby who floated naked in a pool staring at a dollar bill on the album cover of Nirvana's breakthrough album Nevermind, is suing like everyone that had to do with the album... because he doesn't want to work for a living... I mean he feels his image was exploited as illegal porn by the record company and band. IE, he was portrayed, as a baby, as a sex worker because he is naked and looking at money.

The lawsuit alleges Elden was sexualized because the dollar bill used in the image made the baby resemble "a sex worker."

I don't know. Could I or Keith&Co made that up? Its possible, but then again, why bother?

It is unknown why it took so long to feel exploited. I would figure the dick jokes would have been a theme in his life for quite a while now. Regardless, he wants $150k from everyone... maybe even every person who bought the album, to put things right and not feel as exploited as a portrayed incredibly underaged sex worker.

 

[Politesse]

link

You might think this is misplaced and belongs in the Freethought Humor section, but truth be told, this concept I wouldn't have considered funny enough to go forward with. But the person that was the baby who floated naked in a pool staring at a dollar bill on the album cover of Nirvana's breakthrough album Nevermind, is suing like everyone that had to do with the album... because he doesn't want to work for a living... I mean he feels his image was exploited as illegal porn by the record company and band. IE, he was portrayed, as a baby, as a sex worker because he is naked and looking at money.

The lawsuit alleges Elden was sexualized because the dollar bill used in the image made the baby resemble "a sex worker."

I don't know. Could I or Keith&Co made that up? Its possible, but then again, why bother?

It is unknown why it took so long to feel exploited. I would figure the dick jokes would have been a theme in his life for quite a while now. Regardless, he wants $150k from everyone... maybe even every person who bought the album, to put things right and not feel as exploited as a portrayed incredibly underaged sex worker.

Yes, I can see how embarassing it might be, to be seen as desperately plugging for money.

 

[ZiprHead]

link

You might think this is misplaced and belongs in the Freethought Humor section, but truth be told, this concept I wouldn't have considered funny enough to go forward with. But the person that was the baby who floated naked in a pool staring at a dollar bill on the album cover of Nirvana's breakthrough album Nevermind, is suing like everyone that had to do with the album... because he doesn't want to work for a living... I mean he feels his image was exploited as illegal porn by the record company and band. IE, he was portrayed, as a baby, as a sex worker because he is naked and looking at money.

The lawsuit alleges Elden was sexualized because the dollar bill used in the image made the baby resemble "a sex worker."

I don't know. Could I or Keith&Co made that up? Its possible, but then again, why bother?

It is unknown why it took so long to feel exploited. I would figure the dick jokes would have been a theme in his life for quite a while now. Regardless, he wants $150k from everyone... maybe even every person who bought the album, to put things right and not feel as exploited as a portrayed incredibly underaged sex worker.

Yes, I can see how embarassing it might be, to be seen as desperately plugging for money.

If he didn't want his picture taken he could have objected at the time. - (Metaphor style response.)

 

[Loren Pechtel]

If he objected then why did he accept money to recreate the picture as an adult?

 

[ideologyhunter]

Christians, here's the opportunity Jesus has been waiting for -- to prove his reality by suing the Hermitage and the Estate of Leonardo da Vinci for Madonna and the Child. This has Allred written all over it.
1) Child porn with full frontal plus mouth action on exposed nipple
2) Exploitation of unwed mother for profit
3) Catfishing of virginal young woman by spreading image of bared breasts

 

[hurtinbuckaroo]

He’s suing because (seriously) women dump him when they find out he didn’t make a lot of money for it.

 

[Gospel]

I ain't hatin. It's capitalism working as intended.

 

[ZiprHead]

Wouldn't the statute of limitations apply?

 

[hurtinbuckaroo]

Wouldn't the statute of limitations apply?

In a civil case?

 

[ideologyhunter]

What if the judgment comes back as, "Dismissed with prejudice. You weren't that hot"?

 

[TSwizzle]

The lawsuit alleges Elden was sexualized because the dollar bill used in the image made the baby resemble "a sex worker."

I don't get that from the image. I never really thought much about it but I just viewed it as depicting that straight from the womb we are chasing money. I thought about The Skids "Working For The Yankee Dollar" too.

He should try to leverage his "fame" to get on celebrity big brother or some other reality show.

 

[ZiprHead]

What if the judgment comes back as, "Dismissed with prejudice. You weren't that hot"?

Or better yet "never mind".

 

[ZiprHead]

Wouldn't the statute of limitations apply?

In a civil case?

Suing in a federal court. 10 year SoL.