Opinion: Kavanaugh exposes the amorality of America's ruling class

[Underseer]

https://www.vice.com/amp/en_us/arti...the-savage-amorality-of-americas-ruling-class

I would say he also exposes the immorality of the serfs who worship America's ruling class. Once the elites instruct them to support something, nothing can make them stop. Nothing is too depraved for them.

 

[untermensche]

It's called politics.

For many there is no shame and they do not care about anything but winning.

Even when a complete horror is elected president nobody from his party stands up and says so.

 

[Trausti]

Vice

 

[Underseer]

It's called politics.

For many there is no shame and they do not care about anything but winning.

Even when a complete horror is elected president nobody from his party stands up and says so.

This is a little beyond politics. There was a time when people would be too ashamed to put a criminal (not just any criminal, but a criminal who openly opposes the Magna Carta and the rule of law) on the Supreme Court in order to protect a traitor in the White House.

- - - Updated - - -

Vice

Oh look who is predictably trying to change the subject.

Thanks for admitting that you're wrong and that what your fellow rightists are doing is indefensible.

 

[untermensche]

If the dolphin consents it isn't vice.

It is not more than politics.

It is pure politics and nothing else.

Winning and looting.

That is all the right stands for anymore.

They have NO productive plans.

It is all nothing but looting schemes.

And focus group language to fool the suckers.

 

[Trausti]

It's called politics.

For many there is no shame and they do not care about anything but winning.

Even when a complete horror is elected president nobody from his party stands up and says so.

This is a little beyond politics. There was a time when people would be too ashamed to put a criminal (not just any criminal, but a criminal who openly opposes the Magna Carta and the rule of law) on the Supreme Court in order to protect a traitor in the White House.

- - - Updated - - -

Vice

Oh look who is predictably trying to change the subject.

Thanks for admitting that you're wrong and that what your fellow rightists are doing is indefensible.

Thanks for admitting you take moral advice from a publication that writes about ingesting animals through your anus. How was your vagina breakfast? What have you put up your butt?

 

[untermensche]

He didn't take moral advice. He took a story.

The right has no morality.

They only care about winning.

They bow and scrape to Trump. Unbelievable!

Spineless scum.

 

[Trausti]

He didn't take moral advice. He took a story.

The right has no morality.

They only care about winning.

They bow and scrape to Trump. Unbelievable!

Spineless scum.

So it's moral to accuse someone of rape without evidence so long as it suits your political needs?

 

[untermensche]

He didn't take moral advice. He took a story.

The right has no morality.

They only care about winning.

They bow and scrape to Trump. Unbelievable!

Spineless scum.

So it's moral to accuse someone of rape without evidence so long as it suits your political needs?

Rape is a very serious allegation.

The accuser needs to be heard.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

What have you put up your butt?

Personally I am too lazy to put things in my butt. But why are you denying that prostates exist? Is it religion telling you the prostate and clitoris don't exist? Missionary sex only? Is that why you're so grouchy?

 

[starwater]

The Gender Over People party will ram this nomination down the throats of women. They will not go away quietly.

 

[Tom Sawyer]

What have you put up your butt?

Personally I am too lazy to put things in my butt. But why are you denying that prostates exist? Is it religion telling you the prostate and clitoris don't exist? Missionary sex only? Is that why you're so grouchy?

I think the point is that putting things up your butt can potentially be dangerous and it should only be done by trained and professional sex workers. You don't want to just be ramming things up there willy-nilly.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

What have you put up your butt?

Personally I am too lazy to put things in my butt. But why are you denying that prostates exist? Is it religion telling you the prostate and clitoris don't exist? Missionary sex only? Is that why you're so grouchy?

I think the point is that putting things up your butt can potentially be dangerous and it should only be done by trained and professional sex workers. You don't want to just be ramming things up there willy-nilly.

No, I decided to Google the original article and I think the point is that it was intending to make men aware of the pleasure their bodies are capable of bringing...that further to make an analogy it is like in the 60's women finding out about the clitoris. Except there is no great awakening for men, just a fear of teh gay and taboo. If we are to honestly examine Trausti's statement it takes advantage of the cultural taboo in order to put down and silence a minority espousing a factual claim that prostates give more sexual pleasure than traditional pre-approved Judeo-Islamo-Christian sex.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

He didn't take moral advice. He took a story.

The right has no morality.

They only care about winning.

They bow and scrape to Trump. Unbelievable!

Spineless scum.

So it's moral to accuse someone of rape without evidence so long as it suits your political needs?

Rape is a very serious allegation.

The accuser needs to be heard.

So you don't disagree. You're basically saying that the means don't matter, only the end result. Down that road lies great evil.

 

[ZiprHead]

Rape is a very serious allegation.

The accuser needs to be heard.

So you don't disagree. You're basically saying that the means don't matter, only the end result. Down that road lies great evil.

How in the fuck do you get that from what he said?

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Rape is a very serious allegation.

The accuser needs to be heard.

So you don't disagree. You're basically saying that the means don't matter, only the end result. Down that road lies great evil.

How in the fuck do you get that from what he said?

He was responding to a post specifically about the political advantage of bringing the allegation. That's apparently enough for him.

 

[untermensche]

How in the fuck do you get that from what he said?

He was responding to a post specifically about the political advantage of bringing the allegation. That's apparently enough for him.

Yes. Serious allegations are enough for me to want to hear them.

You want to dismiss them without even hearing them for some strange reason.

 

[ZiprHead]

We are so lucky to have these rich moral Catholics like Kavanaugh to rule over us.

 

[Elixir]

He didn't take moral advice. He took a story.

The right has no morality.

They only care about winning.

They bow and scrape to Trump. Unbelievable!

Spineless scum.

So it's moral to accuse someone of rape without evidence so long as it suits your political needs?

If you have been (attempted) raped, yeah - whether or NOT it suits your political needs. Of course, if Bullshit Brett had done nothing wrong he would be screaming for the FBI to investigate, don't you think?

 

[scombrid]

What happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep; unless maybe the FBI investigates.