A very stupid thing to say, given that a lot of priestly abuse was men on boys, which would generally be covered by "G"....
No, phands, the 'G' does not cover predation.
In the main, pedophiles attack children based on their age, not their gender.
The movement is intended to cover the rights and needs of adults who have consensual sex with other adults.
The stats show that most pedophiles target (gay) male children.
Used to be that the idea of a 'gay' or 'transgender' child existed only in the fantasies of perverts. But the concept seems to be catching on. Imagine that. 10 year old boys being able to 'come out' and talk freely (to older men) about their preference for [insert pedophile fantasy scenario here]
You've shown no stats. None, not a one.
You were asked to show a source for your "stats", but have either chosen to not back up your claim, or maybe you don't know what a source is.
MAYBE, you believe that a "stat" is a person saying something.
Here''s what I say, stats show that 100% of the people who use "Lion" as a user-name are pedophiles.
And now you are forced to believe that.
Because I have used exactly the same evidence as you.
That other horror - abortion on demand - seems to target (defenceless) female children.
Your made up number her is obviously wrong.
Of all abortions, about 75% are "god abortions" aka "spontaneous abortions" aka "miscarriages" aka, for the Lions among us, "unnoticed infant deaths." Those are not skewed toward girls. Of the 25% that are induced abortions, 80% happen before the gender is known.
(note the CDC report says 50/50, but their method of detecting spontaneous abortions is flawed, hence my doubling of it.)
So your made up number is so easy to refute.
Why are you so comfortable saying things that are false?
Why is your god so comfortable with you saying things that are false?
Heterosexual non-incest pedophile perpetrators (who targeted female children) had a median of 1.3 victims. Those who targeted male children (homosexuals) had a median of 4.4 victims.
You don't known math, either? So that means there are 3.5x more hetero perps per victim than homo ones.
But in the end you are saying something not true in this one too. How can your god even stand that?
If one
actually looks at numbers, one sees even more math:
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Children’s Bureau report Child Maltreatment 2010 found that 9.2% of victimized children were sexually assaulted (page 24).
Studies by David Finkelhor, Director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center, show that:
1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse;
Self-report studies show that 20% of adult females and 5-10% of adult males recall a childhood sexual assault or sexual abuse incident;
Which mean, that, since girls are 4x more likely to be a victim, and the perps are 3.5 times less prolific, there are... here, let me help you stop telling lies:
[table="width: 500"]
[tr]
[td] [/td]
[td]Girls [/td]
[td]Boys[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]out of [/td]
[td]100[/td]
[td]100[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]number of victims [/td]
[td]20[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]victims per perp[/td]
[td] 1.3[/td]
[td] 4.4
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]number of perps[/td]
[td]15.4[/td]
[td]1.1[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
So according to Lion, most pedophiles are homo because there is one attacking boys for every 15 attacking girls.
Here's the thing, Lion. Now that you know the truth, if you persist in claiming otherwise, it becomes a LIE. Which your god will put you in hell for.
As an aside, do you consider all the men attacking girls to be "heterosexual"
just like you or do you consider them to be "pedophiles"?
