• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Quebec Leader: Crucifix in National Assembly Can Stay Since It’s Not Religious

phands

Veteran Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
1,976
Location
New York, Manhattan, Upper West Side
Basic Beliefs
Hardcore Atheist
This is what passes for login in xtian "reasoning"....

François Legault won Quebec’s provincial elections last week and will soon become the next premier. He has already vowed to stop government workers — including cops and teachers — from wearing religious symbols like hijabs and yarmulkes and turbans “in order to protect Quebec’s secular society.” It’s a move that trounces on religious freedom in the name of religious neutrality and creates far more problems than it solves.


But if religious symbols have to go, then what about the large crucifix that hangs in Quebec’s National Assembly…?




Apparently that cross can stay right where it is because Legault claims there’s nothing religious about it.


The crucifix hanging in Quebec’s National Assembly is a historical symbol, not a religious one, even though it represents the Christian values of the province’s two colonial ancestors, premier-designate François Legault said Thursday.





The crucifix, he said, invokes the role of French Catholics and British Protestants in Quebec’s history. He made no mention of Indigenous people.


“In our past we had Protestants and Catholics. They built the values we have in Quebec. We have to recognize that and not mix that with religious signs.”


http://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/...al-assembly-can-stay-since-its-not-religious/
 
So, I guess if some Muslim lady says that her hijab is a historical symbol, she's good wearing it work?

What a fucking tool this moron is.
 
SCOTUS maintains that putting In God We Trust on money is not a religious act. But the Christers sure scream til their faces go chartreuse when anyone challenges that.
 
Grandpa overheard that someone wanted to take 'under god' out of the pledge.
He insisted that The Original pledge had to stand, that's what America is all about.
I showed him that the original didn't have 'under god' in it at all.
THen he insisted that it's a first amendment issue. Wouldn't explain exactly HOW...
 
Back
Top Bottom