DrZoidberg
Contributor
This is awesome. I assume it'll flop. But it might work out. And that would be awesome.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58949867
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58949867
Ready Player One is my all time favorite book.
FB already owns Oculus, and is selling the system cheap to get more people into VR. I would love it if they can create some version of the Oasis.
This post deserves its own thread. This thread is about Facebook changing its name.Angry Floof suggests I post this here.
I have this dissertation on discrimination of moving auditory signals at zero degrees and 30 degrees elevation and 0 degrees, 45 degrees and 90 degrees azimuth that contain information not yet found anywhere else in the psychoacoustic literature I've search. It's been sitting around at Florida State University library for about 43 years. I've never published anything, nor has anyone else for that matter. That's the reason for this post.
It's interesting because I think I've found a basis for claiming that humans and perhaps other mammals and reptiles base their auditory information processing on doppler like information. This conclusion is backed up by improvements moving signals provide for discriminating small angular separations and the existence of outer hair cells in the cochlear nucleus which seem capable of providing a basis for treating moving frequencies.
The paper is dense, in many respects poorly written. Those facts probably explain the factors mentioned above not being noticed. It's a terrible thing to ask someone to look at a paper that hides most of the important data and findings in detailed analysis of signal and technique. However if one wants to take a shot there might publishable theoretical material getting at the root of hearing.
I'm 80, isolated and responsible for the miserable communication job the paper reflects. So I won't be gaining anything if you'd like to take a crack at wading through the paper. I'm very willing to provide whatever help you might need.
Just saying thanks Angry Floof.
Getting older than I thought.This post deserves its own thread. This thread is about Facebook changing its name.Angry Floof suggests I post this here.
I have this dissertation on discrimination of moving auditory signals at zero degrees and 30 degrees elevation and 0 degrees, 45 degrees and 90 degrees azimuth that contain information not yet found anywhere else in the psychoacoustic literature I've search. It's been sitting around at Florida State University library for about 43 years. I've never published anything, nor has anyone else for that matter. That's the reason for this post.
It's interesting because I think I've found a basis for claiming that humans and perhaps other mammals and reptiles base their auditory information processing on doppler like information. This conclusion is backed up by improvements moving signals provide for discriminating small angular separations and the existence of outer hair cells in the cochlear nucleus which seem capable of providing a basis for treating moving frequencies.
The paper is dense, in many respects poorly written. Those facts probably explain the factors mentioned above not being noticed. It's a terrible thing to ask someone to look at a paper that hides most of the important data and findings in detailed analysis of signal and technique. However if one wants to take a shot there might publishable theoretical material getting at the root of hearing.
I'm 80, isolated and responsible for the miserable communication job the paper reflects. So I won't be gaining anything if you'd like to take a crack at wading through the paper. I'm very willing to provide whatever help you might need.
Just saying thanks Angry Floof.