• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Rep. Ilhan Omar and the Armenian Genocide.

lpetrich

Contributor
Joined
Jul 27, 2000
Messages
26,852
Location
Eugene, OR
Gender
Male
Basic Beliefs
Atheist
 Armenian Genocide - I'll quote from that article:
The Armenian Genocide[a] (also known as the Armenian Holocaust)[11] was the systematic mass extermination and expulsion of 1.5 million ethnic Armenians[note 2] within the Ottoman Empire (most of whom were citizens) by the Ottoman government from approximately 1914 to 1923.[12][13] The starting date is conventionally held to be 24 April 1915, the day that Ottoman authorities rounded up, arrested, and deported from Constantinople (now Istanbul) to the region of Angora (Ankara), 235 to 270 Armenian intellectuals and community leaders, the majority of whom were eventually murdered.

The genocide was carried out during and after World War I and implemented in two phases—the wholesale killing of the able-bodied male population through massacre and subjection of army conscripts to forced labour, followed by the deportation of women, children, the elderly, and the infirm on death marches leading to the Syrian Desert. Driven forward by military escorts, the deportees were deprived of food and water and subjected to periodic robbery, rape, and massacre.[14] Most Armenian diaspora communities around the world came into being as a direct result of the genocide.[15]

Other ethnic groups were similarly targeted for extermination in the Assyrian genocide and the Greek genocide, and their treatment is considered by some historians to be part of the same genocidal policy.[1][2]

Some Turks have long denied that this event has happened, and around 1994-95, a certain  Serdar Argic spammed the Internet-wide messageboard Usenet News with Armenian-Genocide denials and claims that it was Armenians who did genocide against Turks. These messages were spammed with some software that would look for mentions of "Turkey" - not only the nation, but also the bird.
 
That introduction out of the way, I get to Ilhan Omar's involvement. In response to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeting about New York State now having early voting, someone responded

Ken Badoian on Twitter: "@AOC Since you are not Armenian and have never listened to a grandmother (mine) speak of the atrocities and genocide committed by the "Turks" between the late 1890's and 1920's you voted only present during last weeks vote on Armenian Genocide. Why ?" / Twitter

I tweeted about two official pages, and then I tweeted

Loren Petrich on Twitter: "@KenBadoian @AOC I quickly found all these official webpages with some research.
So do the research. It's good for you." / Twitter


Here are those two pages:

H.Res.296 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Affirming the United States record on the Armenian Genocide. | Congress.gov | Library of Congress - AOC is one of the cosponsors of that House resolution, even if not one of the original cosponsors of it. So her allegedly voting "present" seems rather out of character.

Final Vote Results for Roll Call 591 - the actual vote. AOC voted for it, along with nearly every other House member, of both parties. The vote was:

For it: 405 (D 226, R 178, I 1)
Against it: 11 (R 11)
Present: 3 (D 2, R 1)
Absent from the voting: 13 (D 6, R 7)

The two Democrats who voted present were Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX) and Ilhan Omar (MN). The six Democrats who were absent included Tulsi Gabbard, likely from her campaigning for President, and Katie Hill, caught up in the scandal that drove her from the House.

Every other notable Democrat voted for the resolution, not only AOC, but also Rashida Tlaib, a Muslim woman, like Ilhan Omar.
 
House Passes Resolution Recognizing Armenian Genocide - The New York Times
The House voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to formally recognize the Armenian genocide and denounce it as a matter of American foreign policy, a symbolic vindication for the Armenian diaspora made possible by a new torrent of bipartisan furor at Turkey.

The passage of the legislation, by a 405-to-11 vote, is the first time a chamber of Congress has officially designated the 1915 mass killings of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians at the hands of the Ottoman Empire as a genocide. Lawmakers had previously shirked from supporting such a resolution to preserve the United States’ relationship with Turkey, a NATO ally that has steadfastly denied that the atrocities amounted to genocide.
This was in part from Turkey's attacking the Kurds of northern Syria.

Rep. Anna G. Eshoo on Twitter: "Between 1915 and 1923, 1.5 million Armenians, and hundreds of thousands of Assyrians, Greeks, Syriacs, Arameans, Maronites, and other Christians were systematically slaughtered at the hands of the Ottoman Empire." / Twitter

Rep. Anna G. Eshoo on Twitter: "Members of my own family were among those murdered, and my parents fled with my grandparents to America. What all of the persecuted had in common was that they were Christians." / Twitter

She's a California Democrat.

Armenian genocide and the theater of US politics | Spectator USA
Turkey’s longstanding denial of this atrocity stands in stark contrast with how Germany has handled the moral stain of the Holocaust and continues to rob the Armenian people of dignity and closure.

More than two dozen countries and 49 US states have avowed the fact of the Armenian genocide. Even in the House, there was the precedent of acknowledgement in 1975 and 1984, but as a key NATO ally and regional security partner, Turkey had been successful in pressuring Washington to stop short of adopting the ‘G-word.’
IO explained her decision:
I also believe accountability for human rights violations — especially ethnic cleansing and genocide — is paramount. But accountability and recognition of genocide should not be used as cudgel in a political fight. It should be done based on academic consensus outside the push and pull of geopolitics. A true acknowledgment of historical crimes against humanity must include both the heinous genocides of the 20th century, along with earlier mass slaughters like the transatlantic slave trade and Native American genocide, which took the lives of hundreds of millions of indigenous people in this country. For this reason, I voted “present” on final passage of H.Res. 296, the resolution Affirming the United States record on the Armenian Genocide.
Melissa Chen on Twitter: "Where do we even begin to pick apart Ilhan Omar's farcical statement? For starters, she seems to have ‘All Lives Mattered’ the Armenian genocide. (1/3)
Read more @SpectatorUSA: [url]https://t.co/CSCdv0KoLa
https://t.co/O0iEjOI3KH" / Twitter[/url]

Melissa Chen on Twitter: "Putting aside the ‘hundreds of millions’ figure that she casually throws out (the 1870 census shows the US population at just under 40 million) and any moral qualms she might have about, say, the East-African slave trade over the Indian Ocean which was perpetrated by Arabs (2/3)" / Twitter

Melissa Chen on Twitter: "her explanation proves that she is a faux champion of minorities who only cares about victims of oppression when they don’t interfere with her rigid anti-West views. (3/3)" / Twitter
 
This Is Not How You Show Solidarity | The Nation

Ilhan Omar on Twitter: "@chrislhayes 👋🏽 This is classic “real politique!”
My issue was not with the substance of this resolution. *Of course* we should acknowledge the Genocide." / Twitter


Ilhan Omar on Twitter: "@chrislhayes My issue was with the timing and context. I think we should demand accountability for human rights abuses consistently, not simply when it suits our political goals." / Twitter

Having just spent months reporting on Omar for The Nation, I see a clear pattern. Omar places her ideals above practicalities, even though this can create distractions or even harm people she might otherwise count as allies. In our conversation, we talked about Israel and Palestine and how she’s made it sometimes more difficult for progressive Jews to support her, despite sharing the goals for peace in the Middle East and the desire to protect Palestinian rights. This time, she’s hurt Armenians who rightfully want their historical trauma to be recognized. Omar’s office tells me that she is working to set up meetings with Armenians in her district.
 
The right are going to eviscerate her over this. And they are right to on this issue. I can't see why she couldn't vote for this resolution, and then publicly voice her concerns and reservations of the timing of the resolution.
 
This was a mistake on her part for sure. I mean, I get her reasoning about resolutions and how hollow they are, but there are better ways to communicate that message. It's no different from the All Lives Matter crowd refusing to accept BLM.
 
Feels like a Ron Paul moment with the holiday for MLK Jr.

You are going to vote this down via some sort of 'principle', you better have some Armenian cred already established. It isn't enough to just say 'We'll be talking to some Armenians soon.'
 
This was a mistake on her part for sure. I mean, I get her reasoning about resolutions and how hollow they are, but there are better ways to communicate that message. It's no different from the All Lives Matter crowd refusing to accept BLM.

All Lives Matter sees BLM as racist.
 
This was a mistake on her part for sure. I mean, I get her reasoning about resolutions and how hollow they are, but there are better ways to communicate that message. It's no different from the All Lives Matter crowd refusing to accept BLM.

All Lives Matter sees BLM as racist.

Right. Which is ignorant, just like saying "don't recognize Armenian genocide unless you simultaneously recognize all other genocides" is also ignorant
 
Ms Omar has a knack for making political booboos. One would hope she is more adept at helping and representing her constituents.
 
This was a mistake on her part for sure. I mean, I get her reasoning about resolutions and how hollow they are, but there are better ways to communicate that message. It's no different from the All Lives Matter crowd refusing to accept BLM.

All Lives Matter sees BLM as racist.
Oh boy... let's not get mired in that derail.
 
Ms Omar has a knack for making political booboos. One would hope she is more adept at helping and representing her constituents.

To my knowledge, this is Omar's first mistake in office. What 'booboos' are you referring to?
 
Ms Omar has a knack for making political booboos. One would hope she is more adept at helping and representing her constituents.

To my knowledge, this is Omar's first mistake in office. What 'booboos' are you referring to?
Her mangled description of US-Israel policy (i.e. "It's all about the Benjamins") and her her FGM mini-hoopla (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/08/where-ilhan-omar-failed/596743/.) come to my mind.
 
Ms Omar has a knack for making political booboos. One would hope she is more adept at helping and representing her constituents.

To my knowledge, this is Omar's first mistake in office. What 'booboos' are you referring to?
Her mangled description of US-Israel policy (i.e. "It's all about the Benjamins") and her her FGM mini-hoopla (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/08/where-ilhan-omar-failed/596743/.) come to my mind.
Two of her best moments, IMO
 
Ms Omar has a knack for making political booboos. One would hope she is more adept at helping and representing her constituents.

To my knowledge, this is Omar's first mistake in office. What 'booboos' are you referring to?
Her mangled description of US-Israel policy (i.e. "It's all about the Benjamins") and her her FGM mini-hoopla (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/08/where-ilhan-omar-failed/596743/.) come to my mind.
The Benjamins comment was taken out of context... it was purposefully spun out of any sensical meaning that 'Jews only care about money'. If the Palestinians had such a good lobby, the GOP might support them more.
 
Her mangled description of US-Israel policy (i.e. "It's all about the Benjamins") and her her FGM mini-hoopla (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/08/where-ilhan-omar-failed/596743/.) come to my mind.
The Benjamins comment was taken out of context... it was purposefully spun out of any sensical meaning that 'Jews only care about money'. If the Palestinians had such a good lobby, the GOP might support them more.
The point is that it was a ham handed way to make a point.
 
Her mangled description of US-Israel policy (i.e. "It's all about the Benjamins") and her her FGM mini-hoopla (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/08/where-ilhan-omar-failed/596743/.) come to my mind.
The Benjamins comment was taken out of context... it was purposefully spun out of any sensical meaning that 'Jews only care about money'. If the Palestinians had such a good lobby, the GOP might support them more.
The point is that it was a ham handed way to make a point.
I suppose, it definitely is a weakness of Twitter. Points can't be made well via brevity. I'd consider that specific faux pas much lesser though than the unbelievable overblown reactions to it.
 
This was a mistake on her part for sure. I mean, I get her reasoning about resolutions and how hollow they are, but there are better ways to communicate that message. It's no different from the All Lives Matter crowd refusing to accept BLM.

All Lives Matter sees BLM as racist.

Right. Which is ignorant, just like saying "don't recognize Armenian genocide unless you simultaneously recognize all other genocides" is also ignorant

The stated motives of BLM are reasonable and your comparison would apply. In practice, though, BLM basically says police shootings of blacks are wrong unless the black was blazing away first. That's a completely unreasonable standard.

Also, most genocides are recognized for what they were. The big issue with the Armenian genocide is Turkey is still trying to pretend it didn't happen. Omar doesn't like anything that reflects badly on her flavor of Islam.
 
This was a mistake on her part for sure. I mean, I get her reasoning about resolutions and how hollow they are, but there are better ways to communicate that message. It's no different from the All Lives Matter crowd refusing to accept BLM.

All Lives Matter sees BLM as racist.

Right. Which is ignorant, just like saying "don't recognize Armenian genocide unless you simultaneously recognize all other genocides" is also ignorant

The actual difference is that Omar, like BLM, actually does speak out against abuses regardless of skin color, ethnicity, and the like.

"All Lives Matter" is really not a movement or organization at at all, but rather a cynical slogan for people who generally, but not always, rush to defend any violence against black people - much like "white pride" and "It's okay to be White" are in fact phrases commonly used by white supremacists, rather than by white people demanding that they be treated exactly the same as black and Native American people are. This is why the phrase gets so much pushback when uttered by a democrat.

(Oddly, there seem to be no such major groups centered around that last demand at all.)
 
Back
Top Bottom