• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Right-Wing Dicks Offer a Primer on How Not to Mourn a Terror Victim

You'd be free to say it. Just like she is free to criticize Mueller despite her dying in tragic circumstances (at least she wasn't beheaded though).

- - - Updated - - -

The link does not say she was a member,
Distinction without a difference.
Oh, so you don't feel that she is open to criticism of what she actually did, but rather she is open to condemnation because of unestablished level of affiliation. Understood.

I'm just glad that you can see her "tragic" death has a silver lining for your political position.
 
I think it is a kind of mollusk.

Are you confusing it with "Muschel" (bivalve, i.e. clams, oysters, mussels etc.)?
"Schlüssel" actually means "key" or "wrench" in German.
So if you feel you must insult her you could call her a "spanner" I guess.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humour

People of all ages and cultures respond to humour. Most people are able to experience humour—i.e., to be amused, to smile or laugh at something funny—and thus are considered to have a sense of humour. The hypothetical person lacking a sense of humour would likely find the behaviour induced by humour to be inexplicable, strange, or even irrational. Though ultimately decided by personal taste, the extent to which a person finds something humorous depends on a host of variables, including geographical location, culture, maturity, level of education, intelligence and context.
 
Oh, so you don't feel that she is open to criticism of what she actually did, but rather she is open to condemnation because of unestablished level of affiliation. Understood.
Quite the opposite. Her actions with ISM are what opens her to criticism, regardless of whether she had an actual ISM membership card or not.
 
This is the same Debbie Schlussel who has advocated genocide of all the world's Muslims and essentially said that the people Anders Breivik killed got what they deserved, yes?

I'll see your "cunt" and raise you "pieceofshitcuntassbitch," thanks.
 
Oh, so you don't feel that she is open to criticism of what she actually did, but rather she is open to condemnation because of unestablished level of affiliation. Understood.
Quite the opposite. Her actions with ISM are what opens her to criticism, regardless of whether she had an actual ISM membership card or not.
I'm not talking about her membership, I'm talking about her action with the ISM. You seem proud to say "Yea... we can criticize her for her actions with ISM", but seem to fail to actually say what she actually did, in which the criticism would be about.

This person went somewhere she shouldn't have went. She didn't know what she was doing (regarding security), and had a naive and whimsical view of the region and didn't understand the dangers she was facing. Her ignorance and sense of compassion got her killed / likely very poorly treated (tortured?) and you want to rail on about her "actions" without citing one of them. That is just pathetic.
 
You'd be free to say it. Just like she is free to criticize Mueller despite her dying in tragic circumstances (at least she wasn't beheaded though).
But she's not just 'criticizing' Mueller, she's redefining what being an American means. Her patriotic slurs against someone seem to out her as not being patriotic, though. So it's the pot calling the kettle a pot, unless it's understood that her rejection of 1st Amendment freedoms removes her from being an American, and thus also removes her 1st Amendment protections....
 
You'd be free to say it. Just like she is free to criticize Mueller despite her dying in tragic circumstances (at least she wasn't beheaded though).
But she's not just 'criticizing' Mueller, she's redefining what being an American means. Her patriotic slurs against someone seem to out her as not being patriotic, though. So it's the pot calling the kettle a pot, unless it's understood that her rejection of 1st Amendment freedoms removes her from being an American, and thus also removes her 1st Amendment protections....
It goes further than that. She hasn't actually linked the victim to any anti-American actions.
 
I knew it could happen but I'd just like to thank the resident right wingers in this thread for proving out the OP title. :wave:
 
Oh, so you don't feel that she is open to criticism of what she actually did, but rather she is open to condemnation because of unestablished level of affiliation. Understood.
Yup, another case of substituting character assassination for actual analysis. While it is not surprising or unusual, it is pathetic and disgusting.
 
I'm not familiar with ISM. What is it and what's wrong with it?

From their website

About ISM
Who We Are
The International Solidarity Movement (ISM) is a Palestinian-led movement committed to resisting the long-entrenched and systematic oppression and dispossession of the Palestinian population, using non-violent, direct-action methods and principles. Founded in August 2001, ISM aims to support and strengthen the Palestinian popular resistance by being immediately alongside Palestinians in olive groves, on school runs, at demonstrations, within villages being attacked, by houses being demolished or where Palestinians are subject to consistent harassment or attacks from soldiers and settlers as well as numerous other situations.
All ISM volunteers must agree to work within the three guiding principles that the movement was founded upon, of being:
Palestinian-led in our overall directive;
Non-violent in our actions that affect others;
Consensus based in our decision making;
Anti-oppression in all aspects of our work.
As we demand that Israel acknowledges and respects international law and put an end to apartheid and its occupation, we must also stand firmly against any form of prejudice, regardless of the target. We oppose any form of bigotry directed at people based on ethnicity, physical appearance, origin, gender, sexuality, physical ability, age, religion and are not limited to just these concerns. We support full equality of all people and expect all ISM volunteers to adhere to these beliefs and take a strong stance against anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and Zionism. In line with a 2012 Palestinian declaration, we object to the baseless use of the term anti-Semitism as a tool for stifling criticism of Israel or opposition to Zionism, partly as this falsely conflates being Jewish with support for an ideology, Zionism, or the colonial and apartheid policies of a state, Israel.

SO basically they take a political stance different from the pro-Zionists on the board and therefore they must DIE
 
SO basically they take a political stance different from the pro-Zionists on the board and therefore they must DIE

They're Palestinian dupes who think they are doing good deeds when they are really supporting terrorism.
 
Back
Top Bottom