Right-Wing Dicks Offer a Primer on How Not to Mourn a Terror Victim

[Loren Pechtel]

1) Evidence?

2) How about the Israelis (and tourists!) that get stoned (and sometimes killed) if they accidentally stray into the wrong neighborhood?

Evidence? Well I was there, unlike you. So unless you want to call me a liar that is all the evidence I'm going to give you. And you are like a child picking sides. Grow up. Life is not a Tom Clancy novel.

But did you actually witness the stone throwing they were supposedly protecting against?

- - - Updated - - -

2) How about the Israelis (and tourists!) that get stoned (and sometimes killed) if they accidentally stray into the wrong neighborhood?

How on earth is that related to ISM or is this just another random factoid-driven smokescreen?

It's relevant because they were supposedly protecting the Palestinians against the same thing the Palestinians routinely do to the Israelis.

 

[Frikki]

Evidence? Well I was there, unlike you. So unless you want to call me a liar that is all the evidence I'm going to give you. And you are like a child picking sides. Grow up. Life is not a Tom Clancy novel.

But did you actually witness the stone throwing they were supposedly protecting against?

- - - Updated - - -

2) How about the Israelis (and tourists!) that get stoned (and sometimes killed) if they accidentally stray into the wrong neighborhood?

How on earth is that related to ISM or is this just another random factoid-driven smokescreen?

It's relevant because they were supposedly protecting the Palestinians against the same thing the Palestinians routinely do to the Israelis.

No but I had stones trown at me for working on the sabbath in Hebron when I was working there and the IDF installed a chain link fence above the street that lies below the Hebron "settlement" because the "settlers" made sport of trowing stones at the Palestinians below. Now Loren you can man up, hypothetically, and just call me a liar. But you are literally defending terrorists.

- - - Updated - - -

Evidence? Well I was there, unlike you. So unless you want to call me a liar that is all the evidence I'm going to give you. And you are like a child picking sides. Grow up. Life is not a Tom Clancy novel.

Oh, were you an occupation tourist too?

No I used to work as a photojournalist covering both sides.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

No I used to work as a photojournalist covering both sides.

Most of the "photojournalists" covering the Palestinians are in cahoots with the terrorists.

 

[laughing dog]

It's relevant because they were supposedly protecting the Palestinians against the same thing the Palestinians routinely do to the Israelis.

Unless you can show that this particular woman was throwing stones, this is completely irrelevant. Add in you have not shown that ISM members were throwing stones, and we have yet another handwaved derail from you.

- - - Updated - - -

No I used to work as a photojournalist covering both sides.

Most of the "photojournalists" covering the Palestinians are in cahoots with the terrorists.

Please just stop with your unsupported and unsupportable derailing generalizations. They simply make reinforce the OP claim.

 

[Frikki]

No I used to work as a photojournalist covering both sides.

Most of the "photojournalists" covering the Palestinians are in cahoots with the terrorists.

Are you saying I'm in cahoots with terrorists? Strange for a man in cahoots with terrorists to cover the rocket attacks against Isrealites in Sderott.

I understand why you would make such an accusation against me. It is because I can do two things you seem to be unable to do.

1 I can see both sides of an issue, meaning I don't cheer for one side and condemn the other like a teenager girl that either loves Justin Bieber or One Direction.
2 I was willing to go into harms way to see and show others what is going on there, unlike you who prefferably stays at home.

I am not a coward.

 

[Nexus]

Are you saying I'm in cahoots with terrorists? Strange for a man in cahoots with terrorists to cover the rocket attacks against Isrealites in Sderott.

That's exactly the sort of thing a photo terrorist would do to deflect attention away from their evil.

 

[Frikki]

Are you saying I'm in cahoots with terrorists? Strange for a man in cahoots with terrorists to cover the rocket attacks against Isrealites in Sderott.

That's exactly the sort of thing a photo terrorist would do to deflect attention away from their evil.

When I'm with the extreme pro Palastine d bags I'm a Zionist and when I talk to the Zionist Chickenhawks I'm a Hamas sympathizer.

What I really am is an adult.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

No I used to work as a photojournalist covering both sides.

Most of the "photojournalists" covering the Palestinians are in cahoots with the terrorists.

You sound like Limbaugh with that line. Enjoy your company.

 

[fromderinside]

Most of the "photojournalists" covering the Palestinians are in cahoots with the terrorists.

You sound like Limbaugh with that line. Enjoy your company.

Patty cake patty cake dodger man. Run from responsibility as fact as you can.

 

[TSwizzle]

Gap year student from privileged background goes on adventure, come a cropper. Tragic but that's what these types do.

 

[Nice Squirrel]

That's exactly the sort of thing a photo terrorist would do to deflect attention away from their evil.

When I'm with the extreme pro Palastine d bags I'm a Zionist and when I talk to the Zionist Chickenhawks I'm a Hamas sympathizer.

What I really am is an adult.

I think this underscores my (and many people's position) who are simply sick of these discussions. Nobody can see clearly because they are so quick to judge. I'd say give it all back to the Ottomans if I thought it would help.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Most of the "photojournalists" covering the Palestinians are in cahoots with the terrorists.

Are you saying I'm in cahoots with terrorists? Strange for a man in cahoots with terrorists to cover the rocket attacks against Isrealites in Sderott.

I understand why you would make such an accusation against me. It is because I can do two things you seem to be unable to do.

1 I can see both sides of an issue, meaning I don't cheer for one side and condemn the other like a teenager girl that either loves Justin Bieber or One Direction.
2 I was willing to go into harms way to see and show others what is going on there, unlike you who prefferably stays at home.

I am not a coward.

I'm saying it's a very suspicious credential, not that all photojournalists were in cahoots with the terrorists.

 

[Frikki]

Are you saying I'm in cahoots with terrorists? Strange for a man in cahoots with terrorists to cover the rocket attacks against Isrealites in Sderott.

I understand why you would make such an accusation against me. It is because I can do two things you seem to be unable to do.

1 I can see both sides of an issue, meaning I don't cheer for one side and condemn the other like a teenager girl that either loves Justin Bieber or One Direction.
2 I was willing to go into harms way to see and show others what is going on there, unlike you who prefferably stays at home.

I am not a coward.

I'm saying it's a very suspicious credential, not that all photojournalists were in cahoots with the terrorists.

Loren the anti terror expert.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Are you saying I'm in cahoots with terrorists? Strange for a man in cahoots with terrorists to cover the rocket attacks against Isrealites in Sderott.

I understand why you would make such an accusation against me. It is because I can do two things you seem to be unable to do.

1 I can see both sides of an issue, meaning I don't cheer for one side and condemn the other like a teenager girl that either loves Justin Bieber or One Direction.
2 I was willing to go into harms way to see and show others what is going on there, unlike you who prefferably stays at home.

I am not a coward.

I'm saying it's a very suspicious credential, not that all photojournalists were in cahoots with the terrorists.

Man... what does it say when I knew this post, almost exactly as stated, was going to be following his slanderous prior claim?