Shelby Shoup, a Gillum intern, arrested for assaulting FSU College Republicans

[Derec]

Annnndddd...this thread has been officially Godwinned. Only took 4 pages this time.

Too late. The whole incident started because Shelby went full Godwin IRL.

 

[Derec]

Tell that to the militias racing to the border to protect us from a caravan of people seeking asylum.

The "seeking asylum" canard. The open-borders left-wing radicals are using it to bamboozle well-intentioned Americans. Not sure if you are former or latter, but look at this.

The Mexican government has offered caravan participants temporary work visas, health benefits and the opportunity to enroll their children in school. Many caravan participants declined the offer, saying their ultimate destination is the United States and the opportunity to earn dollars.

Those caravaners who insist on entering the US want in to make more money, not because of any legitimate grounds for asylum.
US is becoming like Europe where mass migrants are all claiming asylum no matter where they are from or why they are migrating.
Btw, they have already reached Mexico City.

 

[Jarhyn]

She is not being charged with "massive assault" but with simple battery, which is a misdemeanor. I think the police acted appropriately.

- - - Updated - - -


I did not say it was a false flag. I said it might have been, before the guy was caught.

and then starting a thread about chocolate milk. Chocolate milk...

Just because there are felonies, does not mean misdemeanor crimes should not be prosecuted. This chick committed battery, and should face appropriate consequences.
Do you think she should get a pass because of her political leanings? Or because of her gender?

If he had never been caught, you would STILL be talking about "false flag" bullshit and you know it, and I know it, and we ALL fucking know it. And because assholes talk about "false flag" before any evidence for such turns up, we get every low-information motherfucker who doesn't care about the truth subscribing to that bollocks even now that he is caught. So yeah, your "might have been" bullshit is destructive and irresponsible. And we all know it.

 

[Derec]

Wait, you’re afraid of a strong eyebrow and pubic hair????Lololol

 

[Derec]

If he had never been caught, you would STILL be talking about "false flag" bullshit and you know it, and I know it, and we ALL fucking know it.

Wrong, as always. I haven't claimed it was false flag, I offered that as one among several possibilities.

And because assholes talk about "false flag" before any evidence for such turns up, we get every low-information motherfucker who doesn't care about the truth subscribing to that bollocks even now that he is caught. So yeah, your "might have been" bullshit is destructive and irresponsible. And we all know it.

No, you do not know shit.

 

[Derec]

That's some fine ass respectin' the flag right there. She gots it on her titties, and Old Glory's even concealing that sweet ass and her love taco too!

Nothing says "America fuck yeah" than some T&As. But when did so-called 'liberals' become such prudes?

Not like some libtard commie who wants to disrespect George Washington and G.I. Joe by burning our greatest symbol.

Or even worse, put it on a hijab.

 

[Jarhyn]

If he had never been caught, you would STILL be talking about "false flag" bullshit and you know it, and I know it, and we ALL fucking know it.

Wrong, as always. I haven't claimed it was false flag, I offered that as one among several possibilities.

And because assholes talk about "false flag" before any evidence for such turns up, we get every low-information motherfucker who doesn't care about the truth subscribing to that bollocks even now that he is caught. So yeah, your "might have been" bullshit is destructive and irresponsible. And we all know it.

No, you do not know shit.

Yeah I do. It seems you can't honestly parse the difference between "talking about" 'false flag' and CLAIMING it. I don't think you are even dishonest enough to insist it was a false flag. You just talk about it and let others buy the positive. But we all know what you are DOING when you "just talk about it": associating "false flag" with the attacker to push a narrative, and one you blatantly now admit was completely false.

 

[Derec]

Yeah I do. It seems you can't honestly parse the difference between "talking about" 'false flag' and CLAIMING it. I don't think you are even dishonest enough to insist it was a false flag. You just talk about it and let others buy the positive. But we all know what you are DOING when you "just talk about it": associating "false flag" with the attacker to push a narrative, and one you blatantly now admit was completely false.

I didn't "push a narrative". I said that it was either false flag or an incompetent bomber. Both have been live possibilities, but I never advocated one over the other. If you think I have, show me where, or shut up.

 

[Tom Sawyer]

You started a thread over spilled milk, chicken little.

I started a thread about battery with a political motive. But a person working for a gubernatorial campaign. A person who should never have been hired by Gillum's campaign because she is a self-described communist.

Dude, you started a thread about someone who threw a glass of milk at a guy.

You can do that or you can have people take you seriously. You can’t have both.

 

[Derec]

Dude, you started a thread about someone who threw a glass of milk at a guy.

You can do that or you can have people take you seriously. You can’t have both.

Not just somebody but somebody working for the Gillum campaign. By the way, has the campaign even fired her?

And by the way, there have been threads started over less. Like disputes over pools in neighborhoods or grilling at city parks. I do not recall you ridiculing these threads.

 

[none]

are we gonna getta background report on the milkee?

 

[Jarhyn]

Yeah I do. It seems you can't honestly parse the difference between "talking about" 'false flag' and CLAIMING it. I don't think you are even dishonest enough to insist it was a false flag. You just talk about it and let others buy the positive. But we all know what you are DOING when you "just talk about it": associating "false flag" with the attacker to push a narrative, and one you blatantly now admit was completely false.

I didn't "push a narrative". I said that it was either false flag or an incompetent bomber. Both have been live possibilities, but I never advocated one over the other. If you think I have, show me where, or shut up.

Dude, are you fucking kidding me? You advocated false flag BY talking about false flag when false flag is a rank conspiracy theory when there has not yet been an investigation. False flag is hard. And False Flag always comes out. People know that about false flags, and so they are exceedingly rare, and exceedingly obviously stupid for the players involved, clueless fucking old white people. Hillary was INCOMPETANT with security (but trump so much more so). Washington LEAKS. So no. We all know that it wasn't a false flag, and we knew it before you even said it. I CANNOT and WILL NOT believe you are foolish enough to entertain that, for the reasons I already outlined. But... did you not understand that Washington leaks and Washington knows it?

The only answer from the start was Whackadoodle, and you shit on that with "false flag" narrative. And you PUSHED it by not dropping it when all this was brought to you in the whole day you talked about it before they caught him. And even that psychotic Bernie boy who attacked republicans actually attacked republicans. When you go that far off the whackadoodle train, people go after those they hate, not the home team. You might as well talk about vote fraud and all those non-citizens that (don't actually) vote because (maybe George Soros something or other? Is that what's popular these days?). Or how they MIGHT be. Because suggesting what are obviously biased 'theories' about shit is an attack on the truth.

 

[laughing dog]

A person who should never have been hired by Gillum's campaign because she is a self-described communist.....
The "seeking asylum" canard ..... left-wing radicals ..... US is becoming like Europe where mass migrants ...

Do you realize how hysterically silly your posts have become?

 

[Derec]

Do you realize how hysterically silly your posts have become?

Not at all. It is you who is ridiculous. You are so myopic, you can't even see as far as your own nose.

 

[laughing dog]

Do you realize how hysterically silly your posts have become?

Not at all. It is you who is ridiculous. You are so myopic, you can't even see as far as your own nose.

I may be ridiculous, but I am not making a fool of myself by railing about communists or left wing radicals or people either seeking asylum or a better life. Nor am I advocating a double standard by which I came to the US to seek a better life and now seek to deny others that opportunity. Nor am I making the stupid comparison between the US possibly dealing with a couple of thousands immigrants and Europe.

Honestly, your hysterical rhetoric destroys any chance your arguments might have in convincing anyone of their validity.

If you want anyone to take you seriously, take a chill pill in order to stop the lunatic rhetoric.

IMO, the US has more to fear from people who espouse your bigotry and bile than anyone in that caravan.

Finally, with all the real violence and real issues in the world and elections coming up, an upset person throws chocolate milk at someone merits a thread? Someone needs to get a fucking grip and it is not me.

 

[Derec]

Laughing, it is not bigotry to be opposed to unrestricted mass migration. Even if I am an immigrant myself. I am for sensible immigration policies. That's all I am going to say now, because this thread is supposed to be about that angry commie chick with weird eyebrows. You know, Ned Isakoff in the streets, Uncle Leo in the sheets.

 

[laughing dog]

Laughing, it is not bigotry to be opposed to unrestricted mass migration.

It is bigotry to conflate any migration with unrestricted migration.

L
Even if I am an immigrant myself. I am for sensible immigration policies.

Coming from am immigrant who has written we have enough legal economic migrants, that is unconvincing to say the least.

 

[Jarhyn]

Laughing, it is not bigotry to be opposed to unrestricted mass migration.

It is bigotry to conflate any migration with unrestricted migration.

L
Even if I am an immigrant myself. I am for sensible immigration policies.

Coming from am immigrant who has written we have enough legal economic migrants, that is unconvincing to say the least.

one thing I've noticed is that anything anyone* has an opportunity to seek advantages from, after they attain those advantages, they attempt to close the door behind them. It is common behavior, in fact, for most every Darwinian individual ever, since reproductive success within a species is a zero-sum game. So really, it comes down to being blind to the social damage a pursuit of social Darwinism causes.

*well, not ANYONE, but I would certainly say a majority

 

[WAB]

Yeah, I have a standing policy that if someone tells me they aren't vaccinating their kids, I'll punch them in the face. I don't think this is an unreasonable response.

Would you try to reason with them about it first? Or just resort to your fists?

You can change minds with reason. You can't change minds with your fists.

A punch in the face can stop an argument, but it can't win one.

 

[Max Rockatansky]

Yeah, I have a standing policy that if someone tells me they aren't vaccinating their kids, I'll punch them in the face. I don't think this is an unreasonable response.

Would you try to reason with them about it first? Or just resort to your fists?

You can change minds with reason. You can't change minds with your fists.

A punch in the face can stop an argument, but it can't win one.

Agreed, but I'm curious how much time he's spent in jail for assault and how many lawsuits he's had placed against him.