• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Should white local people be encouraged to work as domestic servants in order to curb immigration?

Bar-Jesus

Banned
Banned
Joined
Nov 20, 2015
Messages
308
Location
Asia
Basic Beliefs
Alternative
This is one of the main causes of mass immigration - ie: local whites would prefer not to work as domestic servants, cleaners, nannies etc..so we just get in immigrants instead. This problem is further exacerbated by the availability of welfare which, in UK at least, pays the same as min wage

So surely the answer lies in this mix somewhere?
 
In the USA farm labor has been a paradox.No one here would consider picking crops.But,when I was young crops were pick by kids in the summer.There were migrant workers too,Mexican and poor whites.If you want cheap produce and your pool cleaned,than you must have a work visa system.
 
This is one of the main causes of mass immigration - ie: local whites would prefer not to work as domestic servants, cleaners, nannies etc..so we just get in immigrants instead. This problem is further exacerbated by the availability of welfare which, in UK at least, pays the same as min wage

So surely the answer lies in this mix somewhere?

Hong Kong imports several domestic workers on contract without a right of citizenship afterwards. The minimum they are paid is stipulated in law. Other workers who come to Hong Kong are paid a minimum wage so as not to undercut local workers. It works. Indian labourers on the HK Airport project earned five years money in six months. Hong Kong benefitted so did the workers.

Before immigration the UK had a lot of domestic servants, cooks and nannies. If we had no imported labour then some jobs of course would be paid to local people at a reasonable wage. Of course there would be less, but there would be people on hire. The money they earned would be spent in the economy and not for foreign housing projects abroad, thus robbing us of more jobs. We do need immigrant labour in moderation, but I believe they should be paid as much as a local person so as not to undercut our own workforce.
 
No. Families of immigrants back home receive money from those family members working abroad. These family members back home are living in poverty, real poverty. Not some western idea of poverty that forces one to eat mostly junk food, but real poverty. Poverty where the difference between eating or starving is largely dependent upon whether or not your crops survive. Having a family member working overseas fills the gap for when there is no food. It keeps people alive and helps decrease the need for humanitarian aid. And that's one less thing for greedy, money-centered people to complain about.
 
In the USA farm labor has been a paradox.No one here would consider picking crops.But,when I was young crops were pick by kids in the summer.There were migrant workers too,Mexican and poor whites.If you want cheap produce and your pool cleaned,than you must have a work visa system.

Ok, but surely we can get unemployment down to virtually zero if we encourage locals to do the work? That must be the way forward - and how about in US where welfare is not so easy to get (as in EU) , will the unemployed do this work?
 
Before immigration the UK had a lot of domestic servants, cooks and nannies. If we had no imported labour then some jobs of course would be paid to local people at a reasonable wage. Of course there would be less, but there would be people on hire. The money they earned would be spent in the economy and not for foreign housing projects abroad, thus robbing us of more jobs.
What are you on about here - what foreign housing projects? What jobs being robbed?
 
No. Families of immigrants back home receive money from those family members working abroad. These family members back home are living in poverty, real poverty. Not some western idea of poverty that forces one to eat mostly junk food, but real poverty. It keeps people alive and helps decrease the need for humanitarian aid. And that's one less thing for greedy, money-centered people to complain about.

Oh, pleeeeeeeeease, spare us all your leftie bleeding hearts drivel!:sad-smiley-021: I couldnae give a fuck about the peasants abroad, I just want to get local people working instead of relying on immigrant labor -
 
What you appear to be missing is that the white people don't WANT to work those jobs. I've volunteered picking crops and actually hope to some day be able to quit my well-paying desk job to farm full time. It is hard, back-breaking work for little money. You are out in the elements for 16 hour+ days, 7 days a week. Sounds like a dream to me, but most people don't like to work hard in harsh environments. I married an Italian women though, so I'm used to such a lifestyle. Okay, that last part was a joke, but seriously...most people don't want to work that hard because they feel they are entitled to something better/easier. It is the people that come from lifestyles of do or die that understand that a hard job is something to be thankful for, not avoided. Unfortunately, the immigrants are far more likely to have that attitude than us white folk. I was educated by travel thanks to my parents luckily, so I think that is where I get it from.
 
Paying people a living wage? We had a big go-around in Canada about Temporary Foreign Workers being used to fill fast food joint jobs. Can you imagine? Billion dollar corporations like Mc Donalds and Tim Hortons not wanting to pay people a proper wage. Like we need a fast food joint on every corner anyways...
 
Paying people a living wage? We had a big go-around in Canada about Temporary Foreign Workers being used to fill fast food joint jobs. Can you imagine? Billion dollar corporations like Mc Donalds and Tim Hortons not wanting to pay people a proper wage. Like we need a fast food joint on every corner anyways...

How would paying a "living wage" curb immigration? If anything, it would explode immigration.
 
This is one of the main causes of mass immigration - ie: local whites would prefer not to work as domestic servants, cleaners, nannies etc..so we just get in immigrants instead. This problem is further exacerbated by the availability of welfare which, in UK at least, pays the same as min wage

So surely the answer lies in this mix somewhere?
Mass immigration is caused by people living in abject poverty with corrupt governments. They leave in order to provide a better life for the families.
 
How dare you suggest that a white person should work as a domestic servant! Shame on you, sir.
 
This is one of the main causes of mass immigration - ie: local whites would prefer not to work as domestic servants, cleaners, nannies etc..so we just get in immigrants instead. This problem is further exacerbated by the availability of welfare which, in UK at least, pays the same as min wage

So surely the answer lies in this mix somewhere?
Surely the answer lies in not hiring domestic servants. Why would anyone want one? Kiss your privacy goodbye. And if you don't personally want the experience of raising a kid, you know who works cheaper than Guatemalans? Trojans.
 
This is one of the main causes of mass immigration - ie: local whites would prefer not to work as domestic servants, cleaners, nannies etc..so we just get in immigrants instead. This problem is further exacerbated by the availability of welfare which, in UK at least, pays the same as min wage

So surely the answer lies in this mix somewhere?
Not enough supply of legal workers compared to the demand? hmmm, what should normally happen when there's not enough supply to meet demand?
 
This is one of the main causes of mass immigration - ie: local whites would prefer not to work as domestic servants, cleaners, nannies etc..so we just get in immigrants instead. This problem is further exacerbated by the availability of welfare which, in UK at least, pays the same as min wage

So surely the answer lies in this mix somewhere?
Not enough supply of legal workers compared to the demand? hmmm, what should normally happen when there's not enough supply to meet demand?

The supply roughly matches the demand - he wants to artificially limit the supply because he wants to maintain the purity and essence of his natural fluids.

Why a Brit in Asia, though, is so concerned about immigration in the UK I'll never know.
 
Not enough supply of legal workers compared to the demand? hmmm, what should normally happen when there's not enough supply to meet demand?

The supply roughly matches the demand - he wants to artificially limit the supply because he wants to maintain the purity and essence of his natural fluids.

Why a Brit in Asia, though, is so concerned about immigration in the UK I'll never know.
Frustration of the unbearable whiteness of being... in Asia.
 
I couldnae give a fuck about the peasants abroad,-
But that's actualy where your problem lies.
immigration will always be a problem as long as living THERE is not as attractive as cleaning toilets HERE.

Putting locals to work won't make HERE any less attractive to someone who can't get food or clean water or a vote THERE.
 
What you appear to be missing is that the white people don't WANT to work those jobs.

That may be true, but no one really 'wants' these jobs. But surely better to push our own people into this kind of work than have them sit on benefits whilst the immigrants do it - I mean long term this must be better for the economy, surely? And they don't need to be 16hrs a day, can be a normal length shift.
 
The key is legislation to keep the furriners out.

Of course those jobs will go unfilled, but you won't have any dirty wogs to stink up the joint.

They are not always wogs though, in fact many immigrants are white, esp in Europe
 
Back
Top Bottom