• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

The Cosmic-Bogeyman Theory of Religion

lpetrich

Contributor
Joined
Jul 27, 2000
Messages
26,852
Location
Eugene, OR
Gender
Male
Basic Beliefs
Atheist
The cosmic-bogeyman theory of religion is the theory that it is necessary to get people to fear the displeasure of some cosmic bogeypeople to get them to behave. This is a version of the "royal lie" or "noble lie" theory of religion. Plato devoted much of his dialogue Republic (~ 360 BCE) to discussing what he considered an ideal society. His society's religion was to be banned from his Republic as being full of bad examples, like heroes lamenting and gods laughing. Drama was to be banned because male actors in it have to portray villains and women. Music was only to be in cheerful and assertive styles, and not in sorrowful or lazy styles. And the official religion was to be a "noble lie" that was carefully designed to demonstrate the legitimacy of that Republic's rulers and the place of everybody in that Republic.

Plato's Republic, trans. Benjamin Jowett
(copied from here; public domain)
Book III
Socrates conversing with Glaucon
How then may we devise one of those needful falsehoods of which we lately spoke--just one royal lie which may deceive the rulers, if that be possible, and at any rate the rest of the city?

What sort of lie? he said.

Nothing new, I replied; only an old Phoenician tale of what has often occurred before now in other places (as the poets say, and have made the world believe), though not in our time, and I do not know whether such an event could ever happen again, or could now even be made probable, if it did.

How your words seem to hesitate on your lips!

You will not wonder, I replied, at my hesitation when you have heard.

Speak, he said, and fear not.

Well, then, I will speak, although I really know not how to look you in the face, or in what words to utter the audacious fiction, which I propose to communicate gradually, first to the rulers, then to the soldiers, and lastly to the people. They are to be told that their youth was a dream, and the education and training which they received from us, an appearance only; in reality during all that time they were being formed and fed in the womb of the earth, where they themselves and their arms and appurtenances were manufactured; when they were completed, the earth, their mother, sent them up; and so, their country being their mother and also their nurse, they are bound to advise for her good, and to defend her against attacks, and her citizens they are to regard as children of the earth and their own brothers.

You had good reason, he said, to be ashamed of the lie which you were going to tell.

True, I replied, but there is more coming; I have only told you half. Citizens, we shall say to them in our tale, you are brothers, yet God has framed you differently. Some of you have the power of command, and in the composition of these he has mingled gold, wherefore also they have the greatest honor; others he has made of silver, to be auxiliaries; others again who are to be husbandmen and craftsmen he has composed of brass and iron; and the species will generally be preserved in the children. But as all are of the same original stock, a golden parent will sometimes have a silver son, or a silver parent a golden son. And God proclaims as a first principle to the rulers, and above all else, that there is nothing which they should so anxiously guard, or of which they are to be such good guardians, as of the purity of the race. They should observe what elements mingle in their offspring; for if the son of a golden or silver parent has an admixture of brass and iron, then nature orders a transposition of ranks, and the eye of the ruler must not be pitiful toward the child because he has to descend in the scale and become a husbandman or artisan, just as there may be sons of artisans who having an admixture of gold or silver in them are raised to honor, and become guardians or auxiliaries. For an oracle says that when a man of brass or iron guards the State, it will be destroyed. Such is the tale; is there any possibility of making our citizens believe in it?

Not in the present generation, he replied; there is no way of accomplishing this; but their sons may be made to believe in the tale, and their sons' sons, and posterity after them.

I see the difficulty, I replied; yet the fostering of such a belief will make them care more for the city and for one another.
Plato in Book V also argued that the leaders of his Republic were to arrange marriages using eugenics principles, as breeders of domestic animals do, while maintaining a pretense of marrying everybody at random.
 
Here are some other believers in inventing cosmic bogeypeople to make people behave themselves:

Polybius (~200 - 118 BCE):
Histories, 6.56
online here
... but as every multitude is fickle, full of lawless desires, unreasoned passion, and violent anger, the multitude must be held in by invisible terrors and suchlike pageantry. For this reason I think, not that the ancients acted rashly and at haphazard in introducing among the people notions concerning the gods and beliefs in the terrors of hell, ...

Livy (Titus Livius, 59 BCE - 17 CE)
The History of Rome, 1.19
online here
(Numa Pompilius) ... The removal of all danger from without would induce his subjects to luxuriate in idleness, as they would be no longer restrained by the fear of an enemy or by military discipline. To prevent this, he strove to inculcate in their minds the fear of the gods, regarding this as the most powerful influence which could act upon an uncivilised and, in those ages, a barbarous people. But, as this would fail to make a deep impression without some claim to supernatural wisdom, he pretended that he had nocturnal interviews with the nymph Egeria: that it was on her advice that he was instituting the ritual most acceptable to the gods and appointing for each deity his own special priests. ...

Strabo (first century CE)
Geography, 1.2.8
online here
... but they are deterred from evil courses when, either through descriptions or through typical representations of objects unseen, they learn of divine punishments, terrors, and threats — or even when they merely believe that men have met with such experiences. For in dealing with a crowd of women, at least, or with any promiscuous mob, a philosopher cannot influence them by reason or exhort them to reverence, piety and faith; nay, there is need of religious fear also, and this cannot be aroused without myths and marvels. For thuderbolt, aegis, trident, torches, snakes, thyrsus-lances,— arms of the gods — are myths, and so is the entire ancient theology. But the founders of states gave their sanction to these things as bugbears wherewith to scare the simple-minded. ...

Strabo
Geography, 15.1.59
online here
(about India) ... And (the Brachmanes / Brahmans) also weave in myths, like Plato, about the immortality of the soul and the judgments in Hades and other things of this kind. ...
 
Advancing some 1500 years, this theory had another eminent advocate: Niccolò Machiavelli (1469 - 1527). From his Discourses on the First Ten Books of Livy, Book 1, Chapter 14:
The Romans interpreted the auspices according to necessity, and very wisely made show of observing religion, even when they were obliged in reality to disregard it; and if any one recklessly disparaged it, he was punished.
Auspices were official divinations of the will of their gods, like observing some sacred chickens. If they pecked the ground, that was a good omen, while if they refused to, that was a bad omen.

NM himself was not "Machiavellian". That comes from his book The Prince, in which he described how to win in the politics of his society, and he was remarkably honest about the crooked means that many people used. Even some popes. Bertrand Russell says, writing during WWII,
Perhaps our age, again, can better appreciate Machiavelli, for some of the most notable successes of our time have been achieved by methods as base as any employed in Renaissance Italy. He would have applauded, as an artistic connoisseur in statecraft, Hitler's Reichstag fire, his purge of the party in 1934, and his breach of faith after Munich.
BR also noted that NM stated that a leader should seem to be religious.
 
Plato's Republic, trans. Benjamin Jowett
(copied from here; public domain)
Book III
Socrates conversing with Glaucon
How then may we devise one of those needful falsehoods of which we lately spoke--just one royal lie which may deceive the rulers, if that be possible, and at any rate the rest of the city?

CNN
 
Plato's Republic, trans. Benjamin Jowett
(copied from here; public domain)
Book III
Socrates conversing with Glaucon
How then may we devise one of those needful falsehoods of which we lately spoke--just one royal lie which may deceive the rulers, if that be possible, and at any rate the rest of the city?
CNN
What do you mean?
 
Christians and Bible-humpers in general shouldn't kick at this theory. Doesn't god use murder and lakes of fire to shoe-horn his people into the right way o' thinking?
 
I've often said that we unbelievers have neither the carrot of heaven, nor the stick of hell, to encourage us to organize and act as an effective unit within our societies.

But any society, organization, or nation which preaches some noble lie in order to maintain itself, is still based upon a lie, no matter how noble. And I think that will always work to the ill of any such group.
 
How is CNN the answer? I have no idea of what you have in mind with that answer.
 
I've often said that we unbelievers have neither the carrot of heaven, nor the stick of hell, to encourage us to organize and act as an effective unit within our societies.

But any society, organization, or nation which preaches some noble lie in order to maintain itself, is still based upon a lie, no matter how noble. And I think that will always work to the ill of any such group.


Atheist dictatorships routinely lie to the masses about God.
Why? Because they don't want competition.
 
Back
Top Bottom