steve_bank
Diabetic retinopathy and poor eyesight. Typos ...
In the 90s Christians tried to get Inteligent Design included in public school science classes. In multiple court cases it was ruled a back door attempt to get religion, ie creationism, into public education.
The DI was a leader in the ID as science push.
The Discovery Institute here in Seattle has a slick science looking web site.
ID and creationism seem like a means to sel books and make money.
Haven't looked at it in a while, they are evolving and adapting to changing science. Now its god over multiverses.
Now they call themselves a 'think tank'.
The DI was a leader in the ID as science push.
The Discovery Institute here in Seattle has a slick science looking web site.
ID and creationism seem like a means to sel books and make money.
Discovery Institute
A public policy think tank advancing a culture of purpose, creativity, and innovation.
www.discovery.org
Haven't looked at it in a while, they are evolving and adapting to changing science. Now its god over multiverses.
Now they call themselves a 'think tank'.
Darwinist: Learning to Live with Panpsychism? | Evolution News
Jerry Coyne is having a hard time understanding why anyone would even consider taking panpsychism seriously.
evolutionnews.org
Jerry Coyne, a traditional Darwinian evolutionary biologist and author of Why Evolution Is True, is having a hard time understanding why anyone would even consider taking panpsychism seriously. His bafflement over the growing acceptance of the idea that every living thing (or everything) is conscious to some extent may shed light on some new features of the changing science landscape.
His jumping off point is a recent three-way debate/discussion, sponsored by MindChat, between panpsychist philosopher Philip Goff, naturalist theoretical physicist Sean Carroll, and physicalist philosopher Keith Frankish, who views the mind as an illusion created by the brain — or, as Coyne puts it, “a trick of the biological mind.”